how to timedemo in Doom3?

[Jeff7181]

Originally posted by: LeGaCi
what's the command to view fps?

com_showfps 1

... but I use FRAPS

 

[mb]

Originally posted by: Jeff7181

Originally posted by: LeGaCi
what's the command to view fps?

com_drawfps 1

... but I use FRAPS

Does that actually work for you? I typed that in a million times, but com_showfps 1 did the trick...

 

[Jeff7181]

Originally posted by: supafly

Originally posted by: Jeff7181

Originally posted by: LeGaCi
what's the command to view fps?

com_drawfps 1

... but I use FRAPS

Does that actually work for you? I typed that in a million times, but com_showfps 1 did the trick...

Sorry, it's SHOW... I was just quoting someone else =)

 

[Excelsior]

Originally posted by: Excelsior
1024x768 - Medium Detail / 8xAF Performance, High Quality in both settings in control panel.

32.7fps , 65.8 seconds

1700+ @ 2.2Ghz
512MB PC32000 (running at DDR400)
Nforce2 chipset
9700Pro Default speed with Spirit Cat 4.7s.

Just wanted to tell you guys with 0xAA and 0xAF, texture and mipmap detail to high quality, Vsync off, I got:

1024x768, medium detail ( I noticed it runs much better the second time around, 4 fps increase, i think this is due to me having only 512MB RAM, either that or the vid card has everything loaded the second time around)

40.0 FPS in 53.7 seconds

 

[GeneralGrievous]

1600x1200 High Quality: 55.9 fps

Edit: 2nd run through 64.1 fps. Odd.

 

[Noid]

Use 'timedemo demo1 1' so pre-caching is used (don't have to run twice)
(like mentioned on previous post)

Anyway... My menus go 'fuzzy' for some reason on 'high and ultra'

1024x768

Med = 46.1 sec at 46.6 fps
High = 49.3 sec at 43.5 fps
Ultra = 84.3 sec at 33.4 fps <------ lots of stuttering

I had a hard time reading the result numbers on my 'fuzzy' menues on high and ultra.

Cat 4.7's / app pref / sliders on performance

click my sig for system details

 

[imported_Onizuka]

A64 2800+ @ 2187
768mb PC2700 2.5 @320
PNY 6800 GT @ 400/1100

1600x1200 High quality - 54.9 fps

My memory is holding me back.

 

[Excelsior]

Thanks a lot Noid.

 

[FluxCap]

1280x1024
High Quality (8AF)
All options on

47.5fps average

 

[Bucksnort]

2400+ 1 gig pc2100
his iceQ 9800p

high, 800x600
40fps
game real smooth

 

[DoobieOnline]

2.8C @ 3.5GHz (FSB 250, 1:1), 1GB Geil PC4000, Asus P4P800, 74GB Raptor, Audigy 2 ZS, BFG 6800 Ultra OC (default 425/1100), 61.76's, XP Pro &amp; SP1, DX 9.0b

High Quality
1280x1024
AA/AF set to application preference

1st run - 50.8
2nd run - 61.8
3rd run - 61.7

Schweet!

doobie

edit: Ok, I saw that many are using "timedemo demo1 1" so I tried that instead of consecutive runs. Scored 71.9 with the same settings listed above.

edit 2: For grins, bumped the Ultra up to 448/1200 and got 74.1. Now that's ridiculous.

 

[xcript]

Just updated nVidia driver to 61.77 (from 61.21) and my score at 10x7/medium went from 31.5 to 44.3. :Q

XP1800+ @2GHz/1GB PC3200/FX 5900XT

 

[cw42]

!! EVERYONE MAKE SURE YOU RUN YOUR BENCHES AT LEAST 2-3 TIMES. FIRST TIME IS ALWAYS SLOWER BECAUSE IT'S CACHING THE GAME !!

ATI 9800pro 256mb flashed to XT
P4 2.4ghz, 512mb ram

Cat 4.8 / High, 800x600 - 48.6
Cat 4.9 / High, 800x600 - 49.3

Cat 4.9 / Medium, 1024x768 - 44.9
Cat 4.9 / High, 1024x768 - 42.3
Cat 4.9 / Ultra, 1024x768 - 38.4

 

[Bullhonkie]

P4-2.8B(533fsb) - 1GB pc2100 RAM - Radeon 9800XT cat4.7, control panel on application preference AA/AF - run using 'timedemo demo1 1' - vsync off, all other advanced options on

640x480
Low - 36.9
Med - 36.9
High - 36.9

800x600
Low - 37.0
Med - 36.8
High - 37.1

1024x768
Low - 35.9
Med - 36.0
High - 35.0

1152x864
Low - 34.4
Med - 34.2
High - 32.5

My results seem kind of low compared to some other people here with comparable hardware. I also seem to be capping at 37fps for some odd reason. Almost as if vsync is on, but it's most definitely off (both in game and control panel). Any ideas why?

 

[SickBeast]

Is it just me or does running at low/med/high have next to no impact at all on recent graphics cards? It seems silly in all honesty. From the looks of it they should have included a low/med/high setting for three generations of graphics cards.

Someone's gotta come out with a serious tweak guide for this game. I'm sure there are *tons* of visual options that you can change by altering a .ini file or with the console.

 

[MegaWorks]

Originally posted by: MegaWorks
AMD Athlon XP T-Bred B DLT3C 1700+ @ 2.3GHZ (1.775v)
Abit NF7-S V.2 (nForce2-U400)
Corsair TwinX XMS 3200LL 512MB @ 2-3-2-6 (2.6v)
Sapphire Radeon 9500 Pro 128MB


1024x768 @ Medium - 27.8 FPS
1024x768 @ High - 25.8 FPS
1024x768 @ Ultra High - 10.9 FPS

man I'm so pissed, my results are so low is it because I need more ram?

Edit: my results were all first tests

Timedemo demo1

I did the test 3 times @ 1024x768 medium and the best result was 30 fps, not bad for a Radeon 9500 Pro

OC results: 9500 Pro 380/600 @ 1024x768 medium 34.7 fps

Cat 4.6

 

[KeithP]

Running Shuttle SN45G
1 GB RAM
2500 Barton, 205 FSB, 410 Mem, 11x
BFG 6800GT (stock speeds)

1024x768 High

4xAA=58
2QxAA=65

-Keith

 

[Don66]

Ultra Quality 1280x1024 35fps
I don't feel too bad about my score, after looking at some of the others.

 

[Noid]

Originally posted by: cw42
!! EVERYONE MAKE SURE YOU RUN YOUR BENCHES AT LEAST 2-3 TIMES. FIRST TIME IS ALWAYS SLOWER BECAUSE IT'S CACHING THE GAME !!

If you read this thread ,,, there is a solution

"timedemo demo1 1" uses pre-caching

 

[Don66]

I went in and turned off antialiasing it was at 4x before.
Reran benchmark using, "timedemo demo1 1"
I got 49.5 fps still using ultra quality @ 1280x1024.

 

[SickBeast]

Originally posted by: Don66
Sorry ATI

I don't feel too bad

 

[VIAN]

AXP - 2365MHz; 11 * 215MHz @2.5-4-4-11
9700 - 370/335

1024x768 Medium

39.9fps

 

[Don66]

Originally posted by: SickBeast

Originally posted by: Don66
Sorry ATI

I don't feel too bad

SickBeast let's see your benchmarks

 

[SickBeast]

Originally posted by: Don66

Originally posted by: SickBeast

Originally posted by: Don66
Sorry ATI

I don't feel too bad

SickBeast let's see your benchmarks

I was more wondering why you don't feel too bad seeing as you're so sorry.

I don't have benchmarks because I don't have Doom3 yet. Needless to say, you would beat me. I have a lowly 9700PRO.

You are the king don at this point.

 

[Don66]

Originally posted by: SickBeast

Originally posted by: Don66

Originally posted by: SickBeast

Originally posted by: Don66
Sorry ATI

I don't feel too bad

SickBeast let's see your benchmarks

I was more wondering why you don't feel too bad seeing as you're so sorry.

I don't have benchmarks because I don't have Doom3 yet. Needless to say, you would beat me. I have a lowly 9700PRO.

You are the king don at this point.

I'd like to know why you think you need to single me out for your wiseass remarks!!
All I did was post my benchmark scores. No need to be a dick!