Are you still here, i got an infaction for intentional trolling and you have intentionally trolled every single thread you've ever been in...
You've had to have gotten about 900 of those by now?
You have a vacation or something? You seem really calm lately and its making me nervous. I'm afraid you might just snap and kill everyone.
Are you still here, i got an infaction for intentional trolling and you have intentionally trolled every single thread you've ever been in...
You've had to have gotten about 900 of those by now?
34% efficiency is incredible. I think that's much higher than photosynthesis
I meant an ACTUAL vacation.. like to Disneyland.. But I just checked your other threads and realize you are the same as you have always have been.
Hypothetically speaking, if this was workable on a large scale and CO2 could be removed from the atmosphere to return the level to pre-industrial levels within 10 years, would that be the demise of the global warming religion, or would the true believers once again rename it and come up with a different angle?
No, because it is not a Religion. Yes, it would certainly lower the concern around CO2. Of course if this Technology works as theorized, it likely is going to Cost many $Billions and would have to be spread around the Globe.
Don't worry, not only will China loan us the money for them they will even take that money back and build them for us.
No shit Shurlock...
And why wouldn't we want this to happen. Do you think we want to continue watching man fuck up the planet? Sheesh...... some people... just can't add 2 and 2 together. Figure it out... Green people aren't against the planet we are FOR anything to HELP it.. ANYTHING...Yest, ANYTHING even planting more trees.... Reducing emissions etc...etc...etc...... You know plant more trees so we can print out millions or billions of toilet paper I mean useless books called your crappy ass religion wasting tree's on a fictional book... Sigh.... Further on the mind virus ...let's cut down some more trees!
Thats funny. Most 'green' people I know do very little to reduce actual usage of things like oil, fuel, electricity. They still live in the 2000 sqft house with the AC set at 72, they drive the same car as everyone else, they go out on the boat getting 2 mpg on the weekend, they go out to eat 3-4 times a week enjoying their steaks, they own a laptop, ipod, ipad, 50" flatscreen TV, cell phones, PS3, riding mower, etc...
But they recycle their plastic, put a couple CFL lights in, and complain about Boooooosh. I guess that makes them 'green' then!
Thats funny. Most 'green' people I know do very little to reduce actual usage of things like oil, fuel, electricity. They still live in the 2000 sqft house with the AC set at 72, they drive the same car as everyone else, they go out on the boat getting 2 mpg on the weekend, they go out to eat 3-4 times a week enjoying their steaks, they own a laptop, ipod, ipad, 50" flatscreen TV, cell phones, PS3, riding mower, etc...
But they recycle their plastic, put a couple CFL lights in, and complain about Boooooosh. I guess that makes them 'green' then!
Well, i'm different then, i use AAA marked goods only at home, that is the highest rating, i use led lights and i shut off everything completely by a switch, i use proper heating from a company that only supplies green power (i pay almost half a pound extra a month for that) and i have a groundwater heat exchanger.
If there was a better option for my cars, i'd probably pick one as my daily driver, as it is, an A3 Diesel is good enough.
No one touches my Hayabusa though, nor my Harley, i don't drive them much but they are awesome when i do.
Here, let me help you shove that bible up your ass a little further... Your not doing it right...
I think your holding it wrong... Yeah, I wonder who's buying solar cells, who's buying hybrids, who's pushing for wind power... Can't be the green people... must be the red ones...
And then you go out to the desert and spray lead and depleted uranium everywhere. :awe: I will give you one thing, you are reducing the carbon footprint of Afghanistan.. one terrorist at a time.
We actually use mainly steel bullets covered in copper.
You really don't have a clue, do you?
let me see if I understand correctly....Fear - non-green people actually are pushing the tech that the pro-green people are asking for, but the pro-green people are actually not really pro-green.......so the non-green people should really get the credit?
Your head is so far up your arse on this issue, it's funny stuff - keep up the posting
Wille says, "Fossil fuels do not lock it up, because these fuels will be used again."
Wrong again, its man and man alone who is the decider, in terms of digging up or drilling up this locked away carbon or not. Its why we call it Man Made Global Warming,
And not part of the Earth's natural cycle.
But no doubt about it, man decided to dig up and burn all that locked up carbon in incredibly short period of time, and now we have things we have never seen before. Do you have a better explanation of why the charges we see are equally rapid?
If not, call a spade a spade, and call it man made.
Its sorta like being someone trapped in a Skinner's box, I push this button and get a nasty electric shock, I may be clueless on the precise mechanism that results in the shock, but its not hard to learn not to keep pressing the button.
This technology can't be put into wide-scale use, because it doesn't require massive cap & tax type government expansion so it doesn't fit into the MMGW movement.
Photosynthesis is 3 to 6 %34% efficiency is incredible. I think that's much higher than photosynthesis
snip
Plant 6 to 12 trees?
Interesting.
Sure thing. All we need to do is cover the entire surface area of the planet in trees for a few decades, and we'll be all set :awe: