Howard Stern's opinion on how much retaliation is neccessary

[bandXtrb]

I've been listening to Howard Stern this morning, and he says that there are a number of countries in the middle east need to be devastated, and that children in these countries do need to be killed because they will (probably) grow up to be suicide terrorists.

It may sound like pure anger, but don't you think it's probably neccessary? Bush did say that terrorists will not be distinguished from the countries that keep them. I would agree that retaliation needs to be many times stronger than what we experienced.

 

[spaceman]

agreed,a statement needs to be made.

 

[MajesticMoose]

who gives a fsck what he says? after all he's howard stern.

What a fscking dumbass,
m00se

 

[StageLeft]

No that isn't right. Thats like saying that since there is a statistically higher chance of somebody being brought up in a trailer park being a theif/murderer than somebody being brought up in a mansion we should kill trailer park kids.

Its crap. Howard stern has a small brain. Nobody should be punished for something they have yet to do. Give them a chance. Killing kids who have not yet been shaped is heartless and gross.

 

[FJ]

Cmin7 said:
've been listening to Howard Stern this morning, and he says that several countries in the middle east need to be devastated, and that children in these countries do need to be killed because they will (probably) grow up to be suicide terrorists.

It may sound like pure anger, but don't you think it's probably neccessary? Bush did say that terrorists will not be distinguished from the countries that keep them. I would agree that retaliation needs to be many times stronger than what we experienced.

I TOTALLY DISAGREE. The ones who masterminded and carried out this plan should be punished, but THAT'S IT. The children and innocents (yes, there are innocents there) have NOT done anything yet to justify slaughtering them. People should be punished for acts not potential acts. Revenge does not solve anything. Eye for an eye does not work very well as a national policy...

F

 

[Rifter]

like crashing 4 planes isnt heartless and gross?

 

[ChrichtonsGirl]

How does killing their children make us better than them? Do we become terrorists to respond to terrorism?

I agree that something needs to be done, and I have every confidence that it will be. But God help us if we decide the right path is obliteration of a specific race, nationality or religion because of this.

 

[Stark]

Of course, if some arab women would expose their breasts and perform lesbian sex acts, he would change his mind.

Stern is not a voice to turn to for guidance now.

 

[Tauren]

Look at who you are quoting. That alone should give you a hint of just how assinine the idea is.

 

[StageLeft]

How does killing their children make us better than them? Do we become terrorists to respond to terrorism?

Precisely.

like crashing 4 planes isnt heartless and gross?

Of course it is. Will you sleep soundly at night knowing that the US's response was to do the same thing to other innocents? I hope not.

 

[PliotronX]

The vicious cycle has got to stop.

 

[iamwiz82]

Stern is a fool. It is sad that he was not in the WTC when it collapsed. At least these thoughts would not be aired on national radio.

 

[Isla]

<< Of course, if some arab women would expose their breasts and perform lesbian sex acts, he would change his mind. >>




LOL! Truer words were never spoken, hah!~

 

[HowardStern]

<< I've been listening to Howard Stern this morning, and he says that there are a number of countries in the middle east need to be devastated, and that children in these countries do need to be killed because they will (probably) grow up to be suicide terrorists.

It may sound like pure anger, but don't you think it's probably neccessary? Bush did say that terrorists will not be distinguished from the countries that keep them. I would agree that retaliation needs to be many times stronger than what we experienced. >>



Yes, it's necessary to kill EVERYONE in some of those countries. Most of them are good for nothing anyway.

 

[Nitemare]

I like Howard Stern. He says what he thinks while not being politically correct.

A strong retaliation is necessary. I'm not sure about the women and children though, but probably at that age they have already been brainwashed. What needs to happen is to kill all the members of the organization including their families(for supporting them and to prevent a retaliation) Destroy all the capabilitiles and severely punish the countries that harbored them....a military presence in the city, a puppet leader, trade sanctions, and replacing all those who are anti-American.

Then we need to infiltrate the Palestinian terrorist organizations and after we find out who the members are. Kill them all before they can attack us. A good defense is a good offense.
If we could pin the blame on the Palestinians on the West Bank, I would send in a military force to wipe them out and restore it back to Israel. I would supply Israel with enough weapons and firepower as needed to hold onto it and end this thousand old war as who the west bank belongs to.

All the Arab nations might hate Israel, but at least Israel doesn't perform terrorism in other nations.

 

[spidey07]

we can't get all wrapped up in whos going to die or start screaming "save the children".

war is war and no matter how you look at it, it isn't pretty.

War is NOT POLITICALLY CORRECT.

 

[Theslowone]

Everyone has the potential of doing bad, should everyone be punished. I agree the wrath of this country will be felt, but we need to keep focus. People who kill others just to kill, well that would put us at the same level as the people who did this, and I hope that we are not. We need to strike quickly and methodically. We are a great nation who needs to show the world that we are above the people who did this, NO matter who they are.

 

[StageLeft]

Some of you guys have obviously never cracked a text book have you.

Yeah lets kill the children. Lets kill fvcking everybody in these countries. You dumb sonsasbitches.

 

[Nitemare]

A kid or woman can pull the trigger just as easy as a man can.

If they had a gun and knew you were an American believe me they would have no qualms about squeezing that trigger. They have been brought up to hate and despise everything American.

Does noone remember Vietnam and the children soldiers they used?

 

[HowardStern]

<< Some of you guys have obviously never cracked a text book have you.

Yeah lets kill the children. Lets kill fvcking everybody in these countries. You dumb sonsasbitches. >>



It's called "setting an example" and we killed tons of kids before, like in WW2 so why not now. It's OK by me the "thin out the heard" in a major way on some of these countries. I say kill them all then take whatever oil is there.

 

[StageLeft]

It's called "setting an example" and we killed tons of kids before, like in WW2 so why not now. It's OK by me the "thin out the heard" in a major way on some of these countries. I say kill them all then take whatever oil is there.

I say never run for presidency please.

Clearly you are totally unaware of how crappy it is to be the victim of this sort of thing. Killing everybody is just what hitler did. It was only 55 years ago. Already forgotten?

Condoning the mass slaughter of innocents for what they MIGHT be capable of makes you no better than who did this yesterday. NO BETTER.

 

[Rifter]

WAR has no rules, if the women and children are helping the terrorists or hiding them or are members of the same group then they need to be eliminated as well, its that simple.

 

[dman]

Scary how some people never learn. If it's true he said that, then, Stern's statement is very close to Hitler's way of ruling. Some of you probably think that never happened.

I can understand talking out of anger and fear, but, this idea is just rediculous. Let's kill all the potential threats in the world, then we'll be much safer and better for it. WHAT?!!! Kill 'em all and let god sort it out. Are you KIDDING me???


:disgust:

 

[StageLeft]

WAR has no rules, if the women and children are helping the terrorists or hiding them or are members of the same group then they need to be eliminated as well, its that simple.

Wrong. Ever heard of Geneva convention? Apparently not. Go read some history books. You can start with 1939.

 

[ChrichtonsGirl]

<<

It's called "setting an example" and we killed tons of kids before, like in WW2 so why not now. It's OK by me the "thin out the heard" in a major way on some of these countries. I say kill them all then take whatever oil is there. >>



You scare the hell out of me. Whether it was done 1,000 years ago, 100 years ago or yesterday, murdering children because of what they might become is still wrong. I can't argue that the terrorist organization that's responsible for this should be leveled, dismantled and decimated - but children?

You can't possibly be a parent if you advocate in any way, shape or form a government deciding to kill a child because of the actions of adults in the same geographic region.