Folks please be aware that high FSB will, in most cases regardless of straps, stress NB a lot. And on Intel platform NB = memory controller (plus your video card). It's fun and all to have sky high FSB, but if you want to keep your board for longer period time without quirks, keep FSB within reason. Many weird board behaviors (disk problem, USB problem, video problem, etc.) stem from the instable chipset/memory configuration, and the fierce competition among board manufacturers to catch enthusiasts' attention totally ruined the image of 'stable' Intel platform. When overclocking Opterons, I knew it was my fault if something went wrong. But ever since I started fiddle with C2D boards, there hasn't been a board that gives me such confidence(?). And to be honest Intel overclocking is, IMHO, much simpler than AMD overclocking at least where it matters - i.e. things that users have the control over. (It'd be a different story if board manufacturers open more BIOS settings and Intel gave us more choices of multiplier without charging a fortune) My main rig with which I get most of my business work done is still the DFI LanParty for that reason (stability).
If I had to say the very gist of overclocking C2D (or Intel in general):
- Raise the FSB as high as possible under the strap as low as possible.
So for instance if you're lucky enough to own a multiplier-free C2D, something like 350FSB under 800 strap with 1T memory would be a pinnacle of performance.