zinfamous
No Lifer
- Jul 12, 2006
- 111,095
- 30,037
- 146
That could be a very short amount of floor time then as apparently they are also considering a requirement that the speech be germane to the topic under consideration.
Regardless, while eliminating the filibuster entirely would be best this is a vast improvement as it requires:
1) large personal sacrifices by the individual legislators
2) the creation of an endless news cycle of bad press as they must vocally stand in opposition to overwhelmingly popular bills.
As things stand now most people don’t even know the filibusters are happening so they are costless.
I would use this rule in coming years to filibuster a republican bill by spending my time lecturing Congress and the people on the history of the GOP in the 19th through 20th century and their pivot towards segregationist wish fulfilment to shift their voter base, in order to erase the horrors of the Civil Rights moment from those that were most offended, such that the real corporate power of the GOP can continue stealing the wealth of the easily-duped.
It would be germane to any republican bill, of course, because that is all of their bills.