HTC Sensation Reviews

sciwizam

Golden Member
Oct 22, 2004
1,953
0
0
Engadget

The HTC Sensation is an extremely accomplished device, but there's no getting around the feeling that it underwhelms. While it is indeed a dual-core speed demon like the Samsung Galaxy S II, HTC's latest doesn't exhibit quite the same level of UI responsiveness and is furthermore saddled with a signed bootloader that prevents users from improving things themselves. Our biggest issue is with Sense, whose fancy new graphics and improved lockscreen utility can't hide the fact that the core UX hasn't materially changed from the days of the Hero.

In terms of design language, HTC is a monoglot and proud of it. The Sensation doesn't break with the company's established styling, yet its subtle physical refinements add up to make it a veritable pleasure to hold and to operate. Combining these excellent ergonomics with the phone's superior battery efficiency and generous qHD display resolution makes the Sensation a formidable foe for Samsung's celebrated new flagship. Given the choice between the two, we'd opt for the Galaxy S II for its brilliant display and snappier performance, but that's just a matter of preference. Ultimately, you'll have to decide what it is you value most in your Android superphone and pick the one that fits those needs best.
Pocketlint

For the most part the HTC Sensation runs very smoothly indeed. We did find that Wi-Fi went to sleep overnight and on a couple of occasions we had to prompt the Sensation into reconnecting, but it’s not alone in this. We found that the HTC Sense experience is more refined than ever, it doesn’t stutter or hiccup as you move around the place and the animations make it more visually engaging than before, even though it sticks very closely to the original Sense design.


It’s certainly a worthy adversary to the Samsung Galaxy S II, its closest rival, and we can see that both will be extremely popular. While the SGSII feels more powerful at times, the complete package that HTC offers in the Sensation will appeal to many and it comes highly recommended.
Slashgear

With strong devices, of course, come difficult decisions, and choosing between the Sensation and Samsung’s Galaxy S II is perhaps the most difficult to-date. Both have their hardware strengths: the Sensation’s qHD display lends itself well to browsing and ebook reading, while the lower-resolution Super AMOLED Plus of the GSII is better suited to multimedia. Samsung offers more RAM and internal storage, but the Sensation never felt at a loss aside from in the benchmarking apps themselves. Meanwhile, HTC Sense feels more thought-out and complete than TouchWiz, and the out-of-the-box experience with the Sensation is more polished than that of the GSII.


Neither is a bad device nor a bad choice; our gut reaction is to think of the Sensation as the consumer’s phone and the Galaxy S II as the Android fan’s phone. Broad brushstrokes do neither any great favors, though. HTC’s attitude to mods may dissuade the Android faithful, but those looking for a solid, well-designed smartphone with a premium feel and refined combination of hardware, software and services will be served excellently by the HTC Sensation.
 
Last edited:

you2

Diamond Member
Apr 2, 2002
5,987
1,140
126
Seems some what negative compared to galalxy s 2; one thing they did not cover which is important to me is antennae for both wifi and 3g/4g relative to the galaxy s2. I.e, how good is reception.

There has been some rumour that for the galaxy s2 wifi antennae is a bit weak.
 

s44

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 2006
9,427
16
81
The two phones may compete in Europe, but not here: the Sensation has 900/1700/2100 3G, so it's useless on AT&T's 850&1900 network, while the SGS2 has 850/900/1900/2100, making it useless on T-Mo's AWS (combined 1700/2100) network.
 

Monster_Munch

Senior member
Oct 19, 2010
873
1
0
Obviously I'm a bit biased since I already got the SGS2, but the things that put me off the Sensation are the battery life and the limited internal storage. I would prefer the sense UI and a QHD screen though. Plus Samsung are notoriously slack when it comes to software updates.
 

you2

Diamond Member
Apr 2, 2002
5,987
1,140
126
Obviously there will be USA versions of the phones. In fact we(usa) have an advantage of seeing issues with the phones before released.

I wonder how good the antennae are on the Galaxy s2/Sensation. Vaguely I think I've heard folks have wifi issues with the s2.

The two phones may compete in Europe, but not here: the Sensation has 900/1700/2100 3G, so it's useless on AT&T's 850&1900 network, while the SGS2 has 850/900/1900/2100, making it useless on T-Mo's AWS (combined 1700/2100) network.
 

s44

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 2006
9,427
16
81
Obviously there will be USA versions of the phones.
Right, but on different carriers.

Wouldn't be surprised if the SGS2 wifi glitch isn't a software thing. There have been many that modders have found/created/eliminated on various SGS firmwares.
 

zerocool84

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
36,041
472
126
Right, but on different carriers.

Wouldn't be surprised if the SGS2 wifi glitch isn't a software thing. There have been many that modders have found/created/eliminated on various SGS firmwares.

What is the problem with the Wifi?
 

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Samsung screen is so good, it makes everything else pretty much irrelevant. The specs being better is nice gravy, but the screen is enough.
 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
Samsung screen is so good, it makes everything else pretty much irrelevant. The specs being better is nice gravy, but the screen is enough.

To each their own. If the G1 has a SAMOLED+ screen, would you still be hanging on to it? Screen is important, but other specs matter a great deal.
 
Feb 19, 2001
20,155
23
81
I'd like to say that Quadrant is totally overrated. You see Quadrant scores vary so much yet Linpack which is a raw CPU power measure shows the Sensation ahead slightly. They're both 1.2ghz processors. Quadrant's almost like 3D Mark in the 2000 - 2003 days (I haven't kept up much with it anymore) where NV or ATI made a huge difference. Even though the Radeon and GeForce 2 stacked up pretty well in games, 3D Mark totally favored the GeForce 2. Driver versions made a huge difference too. I think this is what you're seeing. Raw performance and real world testing should be close to even, but Quadrant will favor certain kernels, drivers, and CPUs.

If you look at the original SGS1 phone, it got shitass quadrant scores. Put Froyo with JIT on it and you double it. Put a custom kernel and you're over 1500. Put a ext4 mod on it and you're over 2200 at stock speeds. Overclock and you're at like 2500+.

People think that quadrant scores have increased over the year even though today's phones like the Incredible S is still a 1ghz phone. Truth is, the newer kernels that HTC has updated along with I/O fixes make the phone faster. Furthermore, the Adreno 205 GPU gives the IS a boost, but really the CPU is neck and neck with the Nexus One still.

The thing with the Sensation is maybe HTC hasn't gotten their dual core kernel down well enough. I bet if devs ever unlock it, it should be able to run neck and neck with the SGS2. After all it's just the same Cortex A9 based CPU. The GPUs are very comparable too. So unless devs unlock this device, you will need XTC to flex your Quadrant e-Peen. Seeing ext4 give a solid 700 pt boost on my Nexus S, I'm confident just by going ext4, you can see a huge gain in the Sensation.

Otherwise, I'm pretty sure this phone is solid.

Also 768mb vs 1gb is overrated. 512mb on my Nexus S feels just fine, and I don't see my friend's Atrix really benefitting from that much more RAM. I think most of the gains will be seen with dual core. If you tweak minfree well enough, 768mb vs 1gb is unnoticeable. Heck 512 vs 1gb is barely noticeable.
 
Last edited:

ponyo

Lifer
Feb 14, 2002
19,688
2,810
126
HTC needs to stop cutting corners on flash memory. 1GB app storage was acceptable in 2010 but competitors have all up their game. Phone industrial design looks dated. People want thinner and lighter devices.
 

Anneka

Senior member
Jan 28, 2011
394
0
0
yeap i agree. and if i think a little 1Gb was a little to "short" even in 2010
 

ImDonly1

Platinum Member
Dec 17, 2004
2,357
0
76
I think they do give you a 8gb micro sd card with the phone. So technically you are getting 1gb + 8gb.

I think the phone is good, but not too sure about the locked bootloader. Also is has hspa 14mbps, why not 21? Samsung will be giving phones the 42mbps hspa by the end of the year like in the hercules (rumored).

I am thinking about getting this phone if we don't hear any announcements of the galaxy s2 for tmobile.
 

SunnyD

Belgian Waffler
Jan 2, 2001
32,674
146
106
www.neftastic.com
HTC needs to stop cutting corners on flash memory. 1GB app storage was acceptable in 2010 but competitors have all up their game. Phone industrial design looks dated. People want thinner and lighter devices.

Really? It has a SD card slot... who cares with 90% of the apps supporting App2SD. Personally, if it shaves $150 off the price of the phone, I'll take 1gb and stick my own SD card in there.
 

Raduque

Lifer
Aug 22, 2004
13,140
138
106
I think they do give you a 8gb micro sd card with the phone. So technically you are getting 1gb + 8gb.

It's 1gb for app storage. There's no data storage (pics, music, videos, whatever) without the SD card. It's not "1gb + 8gb of storage", it's 1gb for installing apps to, and 8gb of general storage.

Edit: My SGS Vibrant has 2gb for apps - I've got 1.45gb free. I don't have a problem with 1gb for apps.
 

ImDonly1

Platinum Member
Dec 17, 2004
2,357
0
76
It's 1gb for app storage. There's no data storage (pics, music, videos, whatever) without the SD card. It's not "1gb + 8gb of storage", it's 1gb for installing apps to, and 8gb of general storage.

Edit: My SGS Vibrant has 2gb for apps - I've got 1.45gb free. I don't have a problem with 1gb for apps.

You can't install apps on the sd card at all?
 
Feb 19, 2001
20,155
23
81
You can't install apps on the sd card at all?

you can. i'd like more than 1gb though. people said 256mb on my milestone was fine now that apps2sd was introduced, but you easily use it all up because system apps like google maps take up a lot of space. it took creating a 1gb partition on my SD card in ext4 to resolve things.

with that said the 1gb i have on my Nexus S is still plenty. but the fact that i need to concern myself when i plug my phone in that my app data goes missing when mounting the sd card for file transfer is annoying...
 

MrX8503

Diamond Member
Oct 23, 2005
4,529
0
0
Everytime I consider an android device with each new release I'm re reminded of the inconvenience of it's app storage. I'm not sure how people live with 1gb.
 

Ns1

No Lifer
Jun 17, 2001
55,418
1,599
126
HTC needs to stop cutting corners on flash memory. 1GB app storage was acceptable in 2010 but competitors have all up their game. Phone industrial design looks dated. People want thinner and lighter devices.

the plastickyness of the SG2 is a huge downer for me.
 

Ns1

No Lifer
Jun 17, 2001
55,418
1,599
126
There are some glaring flaws, however. Where the GSII pairs its 1.2GHz dual-core with 1GB of RAM, the Sensation makes do with 768MB. Similarly, while Samsung have packed 16GB of memory into their flagship, HTC leaves users with just 1GB baked inside; instead you get a preloaded 8GB microSD card. Unfortunately, there’s just no way that even a fast microSDHC card can be as quick as NANDFlash connected directly to the logic board, and that leaves the Sensation at a speed disadvantage.

ugh, DOA
 

s44

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 2006
9,427
16
81
Agreed, but that is how we get thinner and lighter phones. There's always a trade off.
And more durable, as well.

Plastic backs don't break -- glass hitting the ground breaks. Particularly as the phone's mass goes up.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |