He's a typical degenerate so it's obvious enough.
Sure, returning stolen goods to the owner is just like stealing all over again. Good job applying conservative logic.
No, you're clearly not smart to understand the most basic of civilized ideas, no more so than any of your degenerate colleagues. Btw, there's no point in lying about your conservative roots.
After all we've talked about...after agreeing on almost everything...you have labeled me a degenerate? Why? We agree that there is a problem. We agree that there needs to be a solution. We agree that your preferred solution is not good. SAME TEAM BRO. Do you think you could stop being an asshole?
I've asked you multiple times and you have refused to answer. I suspect you'll fail to answer again. Prove me wrong. What will you do if you find out your very existence is due to an ancestor of yours murdering people? Are you willing to forfeit your life and the life of your children? Most human beings fall into this category. How far back do we go to determine ancestral guilt? You have utterly failed to answer this critical question. Until we solve this question, we cannot even begin to make things right. We both agree that things are not right and that injustice exists.
This is very frustrating. I reached out in agreement with you in order to solve a problem. Your response was a personal attack and to try and collectivize me into a group of people so that you can attack me for their beliefs that I clearly don't share. I am very disappointed in you.
It does make it so much easier when they refuse to engage with the longer points raised about the philosophical underpinnings of their objections, doesn't it?
Truly. There's an underlying characteristic of western liberalism to assume honesty, which is a pretty poor assumption of those defined by their rejection of western liberalism. It's simple unimpeachable fact that conservatives stack rank objective truth very low, and thus habitually lie whenever convenient, so any pretense of integrity is just a barrier to understanding these situations. I made this careless assumption here, taking Pipeline's "fairness" at face value instead of checking his post history.
I am pretty sure that in this very thread I have said at least 3x that I don't offer the solution. I don't have one. I'd like to discuss and discover solutions collaboratively. I will not entertain solutions that fuck innocent people in order to give shit to people who weren't wronged.
It does make it so much easier when they refuse to engage with the longer points raised about the philosophical underpinnings of their objections, doesn't it?
As if any group is being fucked by AA.
Straight White Males still enjoy systemic privilege. Or is that not the wrong we're trying to right?
Yes, correct. SWMs do enjoy, still to this day, systemic privilege. We need a way to correct this. I think where we disagree philosophically is that I think we need to correct individual privileges. You think we need to correct it collectively in groups. Your way is more efficient. I think my way is more right. Either way, I don't think we're far off.
Truly. There's an underlying characteristic of western liberalism to assume honesty, which is a pretty poor assumption of those defined by their rejection of western liberalism. It's simple unimpeachable fact that conservatives stack rank objective truth very low, and thus habitually lie whenever convenient, so any pretense of integrity is just a barrier to understanding these situations. I made this careless assumption here, taking Pipeline's "fairness" at face value instead of checking his post history.
Honesty? From you? From the lying troll?
Ok, mister honesty, where are the pieces of evidence of your multiple accusations of other posters such as SNC, glrider and such? Go ahead, show the readers how "honest" you really are.
<trying hard not to puke>
Dear the readers, look at how the lying troll will fold and spin away like a weasel. Just like how he was unable to give a straight answer to Pipeline above.
Your way, whatever it might be, has no method of action against the systemic problem. You're asking for something that nobody's been able to find over the last 50 years. Unfortunate as it is, the reasons for AA continue to exist. Imperfect as it is, you offer no real alternative. You just don't like it.
So...you checked my post history and found...conservative??? I think I owe you an apology. I've been assuming all along that you weren't a window licking retard. My bad.
Honesty? From you? From the lying troll?
Ok, mister honesty, where are the pieces of evidence of your multiple accusations of other posters such as SNC, glrider and such? Go ahead, show the readers how "honest" you really are.
<trying hard not to puke>
Dear the readers, look at how the lying troll will fold and spin away like a weasel. Just like how he was unable to give a straight answer to Pipeline above.
Considering how often this particular troll loves calling black people "darkies," it's not surprising that this particular callout would piss him off so much
LOL!After all we've talked about...after agreeing on almost everything...you have labeled me a degenerate? Why? We agree that there is a problem. We agree that there needs to be a solution. We agree that your preferred solution is not good. SAME TEAM BRO. Do you think you could stop being an asshole?
LOL!
Basically you need to step back and realize that if you're on this forum and you HAVEN'T been accused of something stupid by that idiot... that is, you actually ARE on the 'same team' with his ilk...
It' means that you're a complete asshole, a hopeless coward, and probably a pretty nasty bigot as well.
All those that consider themselves on the 'same team' with that turd need some SERIOUS introspection. (pointin' fingers.. YUP! that means you, you and you... to all those who KNOW it applies to them and to whom this could even be one of their sock puppets...)
No great surprise the guy who loves racial slurs and the guy who advocates for brown genocide and so on make for perfect pals.
Yes, correct. SWMs do enjoy, still to this day, systemic privilege. We need a way to correct this.
No we don't. By its very nature a direct "correction" is to target a specific race. It's the definition of racism. That's AA.
A more robust and healthy economic system featuring proper social safety nets is would supersede underlying concerns.
Do you oppose my solution?
And the way you speak you makes it sound like you want to actively participate in tribalism.
No we don't.
By its very nature a direct "correction" is to target a specific race. It's the definition of racism. That's AA.