Dude, its ok if you are gay. Its not a big deal.
Me? I assure you. I guaran-fucking-tee you I am not in any way bisexual. So dont project your own desire to smoke pole onto the rest of us.
Oh boy not another Rainbow..............................
I agree with you. What's really weird is just looking at the physiological factors involved. Makes you wonder why we evolved to have secondary pleasure spots that are easily accessible by both sexes.
You can test your theory without engaging in homosexuality. Have your gf strap on a dildo of average penis size and insert into your ass. Then come back and tell us how easily accessible and natural it felt.
Women tend to be bisexual.
Men, not so much.
Men are equally bisexual, however they are much more sensitive to social disapproval from other men. Hence the extreme reluctance to admit to their own bisexuality.
I would hazard a guess that ALL of the men denying bisexuality in this thread are, in fact, bisexual to some degree.
The more they deny it, the more likely it is to be true, I would have thought.
Just a theory.
If that scale includes 0 and 100% then you are right. If it doesn't then either you have met everyone, and know all about them or you're delusional, and wrong.
So, as a straight male, because I can look at a guy and generally have an idea of whether or not he's "good looking" while having in absolutely no way a sexual attraction I'm not 100% straight? That doesn't even make sense. You're saying you can't appreciate physical characteristics of the other sex without being bisexual?
Women tend to be openly bisexual.
Men, not so much.
That's not how the theory works. The theory is that people who crusade against things are more likely to be what they are crusading against - pedophiles who demand stricter laws against pedophilia, gays who say gays should all be killed, etc. Saying "I'm not gay" is not enough to be suspicious.I would hazard a guess that ALL of the men denying bisexuality in this thread are, in fact, bisexual to some degree.
The more they deny it, the more likely it is to be true, I would have thought.
Just a theory.
I believe humans are bisexual creatures.
Our bodies are even setup to engage in same sex.
I'm 100% sure you're talking out your ass or an idiot...and yes you are bipolar 100% of the time, you may not always be showing the symptoms but it doesn't "come and go", you always have it and always will...or do you consider someone with HIV and no current symptoms to not be 100% infected? And having a general understanding of what is considered "attractive" and being able to make that determination for someone of the same sex in no way whatsoever could make anyone who's straight any less straight, being attracted to someone of the same sex, whether you act on it or not, doesYou're talking in absolutes about human psychology and I'm the one that's wrong?
You can't have a personal sexual preference for the same sex without being in the grey area of sexuality, what you consider attractive in a man is different from what others consider attractive in a man, because you have a personal preference, relative to you, you don't have access to some absolute knowledge about what defines attractive men for everyone, you are making a personal determination.
Some people will have a preference and become aroused by it, some won't. I find women attractive, but I'm not always sexually excited by them when I see them in the street, that doesn't mean I'm not attracted to them. Some people will be aroused by people they are attracted to, some people will act on that excitement, some people won't... It's a grey area, perhaps you are 90% straight, perhaps 95%, but 100%? I doubt it. No one is 100% anything psychologically speaking.
For example, I'm bipolar, am I 100% bipolar? No. I have bipolar symptoms a lot of the time, but sometimes I'm fine, some people have more serious degrees of bipolar disorder symptoms than me, some have less, it's all a spectrum, as is sexual orientation.
..I think homosexuality should be measured on a sliding scale:
...people who crusade against things are more likely to be what they are crusading against...