Hunter Biden fathered a child while dating his bros widow

Page 16 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,982
3,318
126
This thread exists because the son of a Presidential candidate has made enough bad decisions that he has become a political liability to his father.
Another FOX talking point, designed to make it appear so, when the truth it Hunter is not a political liability......so sorry that you believe everything FOX says!!
 
Reactions: DarthKyrie

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
Another FOX talking point, designed to make it appear so, when the truth it Hunter is not a political liability......so sorry that you believe everything FOX says!!
It was actually a very well written New Yorker article that informed my opinion on this topic. I would post it, but its not like you would read it.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
33,592
7,653
136
The same reason Trump brought Bill Clinton’s victims to the debate...it blunts the attacks against him.
  • Clinton being being accused of sexually assaulting women....
  • Joe Biden's son happens to be a father... 100% consensual...
For some reason the math doesn't add up. Clinton had a legit moral problem. Biden does not.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,820
29,571
146
It was actually a very well written New Yorker article that informed my opinion on this topic. I would post it, but its not like you would read it.

I already posted it for people...in this thread, I think?

It's publication predates public knowledge of Trump trying to bribe Zelensky, and actually details the real timeline of everything relating to Ukraine and Trump's attempt to bribe them. It was published before GOP brainfuckers started working towards inventing a new timeline, with entirely new characters so that their rubes could swallow it up as defense of a completely invented non-scandal involving Biden.

It's a good article, because it time stamps exactly how cancerous the GOP is to the United States. The metastasis of every single wretched GOP supporter that blindly eats obvious lies and propagates this nonsense. The people that need to read it are unread GOP assholes that refuse to accept that truth is truth. It plainly reveals the shameless lies that their GOP bitch children in Congress were fuming about over the last two weeks. GOP voters need to actually be exposed to the only truth that exists, if they ever hope to be relevant participants in democracy again.

So, please post it again. People need to read it, but not the people that you think.

No one is saying that Hunter didn't do anything stupid--but the fact is that the GOP perspective on this is a plainly invented lie, and it's imminently provable that they are doing this because they think their voters are fucking morons. So post the article again. I wonder why you wouldn't just do it?
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
I already posted it for people...in this thread, I think?

It's publication predates public knowledge of Trump trying to bribe Zelensky, and actually details the real timeline of everything relating to Ukraine and Trump's attempt to bribe them. It was published before GOP brainfuckers started working towards inventing a new timeline, with entirely new characters so that their rubes could swallow it up as defense of a completely invented non-scandal involving Biden.

It's a good article, because it time stamps exactly how cancerous the GOP is to the United States. The metastasis of every single wretched GOP supporter that blindly eats obvious lies and propagates this nonsense. The people that need to read it are unread GOP assholes that refuse to accept that truth is truth. It plainly reveals the shameless lies that their GOP bitch children in Congress were fuming about over the last two weeks. GOP voters need to actually be exposed to the only truth that exists, if they ever hope to be relevant participants in democracy again.
Please make note of the fact that we are approaching this topic from the same article.

So, please post it again. People need to read it, but not the people that you think.
The people knee jerking to my posts need to read it most

No one is saying that Hunter didn't do anything stupid-
Then why all the pearl clutching when I take the next logical step that his stupid actions present a clear conflict of interest and political liability for his father.

but the fact is that the GOP perspective on this is a plainly invented lie, and it's imminently provable that they are doing this because they think their voters are fucking morons. So post the article again. I wonder why you wouldn't just do it?
Because the person I was responding to won’t bother to read it
 

zzyzxroad

Diamond Member
Jan 29, 2017
3,249
2,264
136
It was actually a very well written New Yorker article that informed my opinion on this topic. I would post it, but its not like you would read it.
It is a good article. Actually gives you some insight into who Hunter is and the struggles he has faced.

 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,820
29,571
146
Please make note of the fact that we are approaching this topic from the same article.

The people knee jerking to my posts need to read it most

Then why all the pearl clutching when I take the next logical step that his stupid actions present a clear conflict of interest and political liability for his father.

Because the person I was responding to won’t bother to read it

Again--you are trying to justify the investigation based on the invented timeline that the GOP creatures are trying to mash into the brains of their supporters. This article provides the actual timeline of "corruption," that it precedes what Trump is trying to claim, that it precedes Hunter's involvement, and that taking out Shokin was a universal move that was aimed at taking out the person that was not investigating Burisma--Biden's actions effectively hurt his son. It isn't the base lie that the GOP are trying to shove down the throats of the unread. Hunter was hired as part of an "open attempt to combat corruption," even though, yes, it still seems fishy in its own way, even though it isn't that abnormal with politicians being politicians. Biden's people in the admin actually looked into it, I think the Congressional oversight committee took a stab at it as well, and said that there isn't really any conflict or concern with Hunter being in that chair.

The only controversy here is the one invented from whole cloth by Trump and his goons to explain away their thoroughly documented attempts at bribery, and covered under a long-debunked conspiracy that only lunatic nutters believe about some Ukrainian server trying to help Hillary (this was shown to be invented by Russians, as part of their universal efforts to sew chaos in the US elections, to explicitly aid Trump's campaign).

The GOP is repeatedly repeating Russian conspiracy nonsense. That is all this is.

That article is rather hard-hitting and pretty much everything you can expose about Hunter, is exposed there, under his own request. This is LONG before any of this recent nonsense was made public, or known by the wailing masses of Trump land. There is no defense of the GOP attempting to honestly investigate a preposterous invention of Russian agents, about corruption that never happened.

To defend the idea that "something is fishy" is to accept Russian propaganda and information warfare. It is to do their work, and it isn't any other way.

TLDR: the GOP is fucking lying. They are doing the work of Russian propaganda, and any adult of voting age should be fucking ashamed of themselves for willfully accepting such easily disproven lies. There is no way that a functioning adult can willfully accept the base lies coming from the GOP about this, because they are fully capable of learning about this topic, well before it was tied to a bribery attempt that Trump and his defenders are desperate to hide.

Biden and his son are completely irrelevant to this issue, in terms of being the subjects of investigation. They are the invention. They are the lie. Stop being duped. It's fucking embarrassing.
 

zzyzxroad

Diamond Member
Jan 29, 2017
3,249
2,264
136
Please make note of the fact that we are approaching this topic from the same article.

The people knee jerking to my posts need to read it most

Then why all the pearl clutching when I take the next logical step that his stupid actions present a clear conflict of interest and political liability for his father.

Because the person I was responding to won’t bother to read it

What specifically was Burisma being investigated for and which individuals were suspects? Was Hunter ever connected to anything relating to those investigations?
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
What specifically was Burisma being investigated for and which individuals were suspects? Was Hunter ever connected to anything relating to those investigations?
Most reasonable people, to include those directly involved and some of who testified in the impeachment inquiry, acknowledge the obvious conflict of interest. I am not saying Joe Biden did anything illegal or unethical. I am saying that his son benefitted from his father’s name and position of power, and that error in judgment, which he even acknowledges, is now a political liability for his father. Too bad so sad.
 

zzyzxroad

Diamond Member
Jan 29, 2017
3,249
2,264
136
Most reasonable people, to include those directly involved and some of who testified in the impeachment inquiry, acknowledge the obvious conflict of interest. I am not saying Joe Biden did anything illegal or unethical. I am saying that his son benefitted from his father’s name and position of power, and that error in judgment, which he even acknowledges, is now a political liability for his father. Too bad so sad.

Fair enough and isn't that typical of most family members of the rich and famous(see Jeb and George W)? Who ever said life was fair? Just look at Trump's kids. I'm not even sure Eric knows how to tie a shoe.

Just to be clear, you don't have any reason to believe Hunter was part of the corruption within Burisma right? And the wacko trump cult members are exploiting a baseless narrative for political gain?
 
Last edited:
Reactions: DarthKyrie

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Most reasonable people, to include those directly involved and some of who testified in the impeachment inquiry, acknowledge the obvious conflict of interest. I am not saying Joe Biden did anything illegal or unethical. I am saying that his son benefitted from his father’s name and position of power, and that error in judgment, which he even acknowledges, is now a political liability for his father. Too bad so sad.

That's a variation on "some people are saying", right?

Perhaps you'd care to address #338, above. Or just keep reinforcing the Big Lie all this sprang from.
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
That's a variation on "some people are saying", right?

Perhaps you'd care to address #338, above. Or just keep reinforcing the Big Lie all this sprang from.
Because I don’t believe the GOP narrative. You do realize it is possible to dismiss the GOP version of reality and still perceive Hunter Biden as a political liability?

This guy gets it:
 

zzyzxroad

Diamond Member
Jan 29, 2017
3,249
2,264
136
Because I don’t believe the GOP narrative. You do realize it is possible to dismiss the GOP version of reality and still perceive Hunter Biden as a political liability?

This guy gets it:
Many other do and without any facts to back up their opinion. The sheer number of sheep falling for conspiracy theories spun by team trump is dangerous. Do you not see that?

You don't have any reason to believe Hunter was part of the corruption within Burisma right? And the wacko trump cult members are exploring a baseless narrative for political gain?
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Because I don’t believe the GOP narrative. You do realize it is possible to dismiss the GOP version of reality and still perceive Hunter Biden as a political liability?

This guy gets it:

Then why do you keep promoting it? Their false portrayal of Shokin as righteous is the basis of the contrivance that either Biden was corrupt. Your own link shows that Shokin perpetrated it himself in order to claim victimhood.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |