Hunter Biden's Laptop

Page 11 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

brandonbull

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
6,330
1,203
126
fuck you're dumb.

you've swallowed the NY Post article as worthy of publication, simply because they published it, and without any evidence. Yet, now you claim that because the accusation is made, it is now incumbent upon...anyone else to provide the evidence, otherwise it remains a legitimate accusation.

It is the accuser's job to provide support for the accusation.

Do you not honestly see how fucking wrong you are here? This is 3rd grade horseshit, and you've swallowed it completely uncritically.
Maybe you should have had this position for the dossier and all the other faked evidence for "Trump-Russia collusion" or the Covington High School kids. You seem fluid as to when you decide between "guilty until proven innocent" or "innocent until proven guilty".
 
Reactions: Pohemi

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
14,668
7,165
136
Ya, get the scoop from the World's most popular man!

Must have skipped another Intel report.

The purported smartest guy in every room he enters refuses to try to prove it because he thinks those idiots in the room with him might catch a hint that he really isn't the genius he says he is. So, best to avoid these briefings than take a chance of exposing what a moron he really is. This is all going on in Trump's head while the guys in the room are already totally clued in to the useful idiot's ass being owned by Putin.
 
Reactions: Pohemi

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
36,277
28,135
136
Maybe you should have had this position for the dossier and all the other faked evidence for "Trump-Russia collusion" or the Covington High School kids. You seem fluid as to when you decide between "guilty until proven innocent" or "innocent until proven guilty".
That dossier was raw intel which by definition may or may not be 100% accurate.

It wasn't bullshit made up out of nothing and publicly promoted by Republicans and their media lackeys like Obama's Kenyan birth certificate.
 

brandonbull

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
6,330
1,203
126
That dossier was raw intel which by definition may or may not be 100% accurate.

It wasn't bullshit made up out of nothing and publicly promoted by Republicans and their media lackeys like Obama's Kenyan birth certificate.
Funny that you should mention the "birther" stuff. Just like the fake Dossier, the birther movement had it's origins with Clinton's campaign. The Dossier was bullshit made up out of nothing brought to you by Clinton.
 
Reactions: Pohemi

NWRMidnight

Platinum Member
Jun 18, 2001
2,967
2,574
136
Funny that you should mention the "birther" stuff. Just like the fake Dossier, the birther movement had it's origins with Clinton's campaign. The Dossier was bullshit made up out of nothing brought to you by Clinton.
Is the claim th dossier being fake the reason why Muller refused to declare Trump innocent under oath? If the information in the dossier was proven false, and Trump was indeed innocent, wouldn't have Muller declared so under oath?
 
Reactions: Pohemi

brandonbull

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
6,330
1,203
126
Is the claim th dossier being fake the reason why Muller refused to declare Trump innocent under oath? If the information in the dossier was proven false, and Trump was indeed innocent, wouldn't have Muller declared so under oath?

You do understand that innocent is the default position? It's not guilty then Mueller has to prove innocent. Don't forget that more investigators were punished for improprieties related to the "Trump-Russian" collusion investigation than were people found guilty of Russian collusion.
 
Reactions: Pohemi

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
36,277
28,135
136
Funny that you should mention the "birther" stuff. Just like the fake Dossier, the birther movement had it's origins with Clinton's campaign. The Dossier was bullshit made up out of nothing brought to you by Clinton.
The Clinton campaign had the info they didn't invent it. Decided it was bullshit and did not discuss it, did not promote it. Hillary, her campaign or ANY surrogate gave any interview about it. In fact a staffer was fired that circulated it among themselves. Link to ANY interview with someone associated with Hillary talking birtherism during that time

There are YEARS of Trump and Fox News promoting birtherism.

That dossier was the work of Christopher Steele who was initially hired by the Free Beacon, a right wing publication. Again it was raw intel and was never characterized as anything else. Democrats picked up the tab to further the investigation.

If you are going to engage in act of blowhardness at least get your facts straight.

Seems I always have to do the work for your lazy ass
Raw intelligence | The IT Law Wiki | Fandom
 

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,573
5,095
136
The Clinton campaign had the info they didn't invent it. Decided it was bullshit and did not discuss it, did not promote it. Hillary, her campaign or ANY surrogate gave any interview about it. In fact a staffer was fired that circulated it among themselves. Link to ANY interview with someone associated with Hillary talking birtherism during that time

There are YEARS of Trump and Fox News promoting birtherism.

That dossier was the work of Christopher Steele who was initially hired by the Free Beacon, a right wing publication. Again it was raw intel and was never characterized as anything else. Democrats picked up the tab to further the investigation.

If you are going to engage in act of blowhardness at least get your facts straight.

Seems I always have to do the work for your lazy ass
Raw intelligence | The IT Law Wiki | Fandom
And brandonbullshitartist will just ignore. Kinda like a kid sticking his fingers in his ears and chanting “la-la-la-la….”

And he’ll continue to vomit his verbal diarrhea as if you were mute.
 
Reactions: Pohemi

NWRMidnight

Platinum Member
Jun 18, 2001
2,967
2,574
136
You do understand that innocent is the default position? It's not guilty then Mueller has to prove innocent. Don't forget that more investigators were punished for improprieties related to the "Trump-Russian" collusion investigation than were people found guilty of Russian collusion.
What? You do realize the reason Trump wasn't charged because of Barr, right? You know the very man who lied to the nation about the Muller report.

The very fact that you believe Trump is innocent because he has not been tried is laughable and shows just how stupid you are.

Also, obviously, you are confusing inappropriate actions with criminal actions. Just because some investigators you claim (please show proof about your claim) to have acted inappropriately, does not remove Trump's criminal acts, his destruction of evidence and multiple acts of obstruction. Why would an innocent man have the need to destroy evidence and obstruct justice on multiple occasions? Please answer that, rather than skip over it and ignore the question.

Edit: do you even realize that the Dunham investigation has lasted 22 months (longer than the Muller investigation), and only 3 people have been charged, mainly for lying? Compared to 27 people charged with over 100 crimes from the Muller investigation, and that is with all of Trump's obstruction and evidence shredding...

Yet, some how, you believe your claim that some investigators have been punished for in appropriate actions means something in comparison... In reality, all you have done is shown that you don't have an ounce of integrity and are one dishonest person.
 
Last edited:

eelw

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 1999
9,338
4,589
136
What? You do realize the reason Trump wasn't charged because of Barr, right? You know the very man who lied to the nation about the Muller report.
Not giving a pass to toady Barr since he twisted the narrative prior to the release of the Mueller report. But it was the failure of congress to act on the gift wrapped present Mueller prepared for them. Like sure Pelosi knew impeachment wouldn’t proceed to removal by the senate. But she still failed to proceed because she knew American public too stupid to understand what was in the report.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,708
49,291
136
You do understand that innocent is the default position? It's not guilty then Mueller has to prove innocent. Don't forget that more investigators were punished for improprieties related to the "Trump-Russian" collusion investigation than were people found guilty of Russian collusion.
As Mueller expressly stated, collusion is not a crime under US law so how could anyone be found guilty if it?

That doesn’t change the fact that Trump’s own son publicly confessed to colluding with the Russian government.
 
Reactions: Perknose and Pohemi

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,708
49,291
136
Not giving a pass to toady Barr since he twisted the narrative prior to the release of the Mueller report. But it was the failure of congress to act on the gift wrapped present Mueller prepared for them. Like sure Pelosi knew impeachment wouldn’t proceed to removal by the senate. But she still failed to proceed because she knew American public too stupid to understand what was in the report.
Yes, Trump’s impeachment in January 2022 should have been at least his third.
 
Reactions: hal2kilo and Pohemi

NWRMidnight

Platinum Member
Jun 18, 2001
2,967
2,574
136
Not giving a pass to toady Barr since he twisted the narrative prior to the release of the Mueller report. But it was the failure of congress to act on the gift wrapped present Mueller prepared for them. Like sure Pelosi knew impeachment wouldn’t proceed to removal by the senate. But she still failed to proceed because she knew American public too stupid to understand what was in the report.
What? Do you not understand that Congress has yet to see the whole Muller report? They saw the same version we saw, which was heavily redacted, and if memory serves, they are still fighting in court to see the full report.

But honestly, it sounds like you are trying to blame Pelosi for the Republican controlled Senates failures, as they are the ones who failed to remove Trump. However Impeachment is really nothing but a formality and really does not have any teeth other than removing him from office and barring him from holding any other office. Criminal charges and a criminal conviction is where the teeth and actual legitimate punishment comes from.. not from Congress impeaching him... Which btw, they did twice, it was again the GOP controlled Senates that let Trump off . So please put the blame where it belongs.

Edit:. I may have taken what you said wrong, if so, sorry.

I will add, that the reason the public doesn't understand what is in the Muller report is because of the Republican manipulation and straight up lies they told about it. That is why both Impeachments where directly related to charges that where either seen by the nation on TV, or heard by the release of actual recordings. Something that was more difficult for the Republican's to manipulate, which they of course tried and did everything to downplay the seriousness of such charges.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: Meghan54

eelw

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 1999
9,338
4,589
136
What? Do you not understand that Congress has yet to see the whole Muller report? They saw the same version we saw, which was heavily redacted, and if memory serves, they are still fighting in court to see the full report.

But honestly, it sounds like you are trying to blame Pelosi for the Republican controlled Senates failures, as they are the ones who failed to remove Trump. However Impeachment is really nothing but a formality and really does not have any teeth other than removing him from office and barring him from holding any other office. Criminal charges and a criminal conviction is where the teeth and actual legitimate punishment comes from.. not from Congress impeaching him... Which btw, they did twice, it was again the GOP controlled Senates that let Trump off . So please put the blame where it belongs.
Yes it’s the senate’s failure for not proceeding to removal. But under Garland or Sessions or Barr, criminal charges will never be brought against a sitting or former president. Mueller tailored the report as impeachment plain and simple.
 

NWRMidnight

Platinum Member
Jun 18, 2001
2,967
2,574
136
Yes it’s the senate’s failure for not proceeding to removal. But under Garland or Sessions or Barr, criminal charges will never be brought against a sitting or former president. Mueller tailored the report as impeachment plain and simple.
Which in itself is wrong. By not ever formally charging a sitting President, or a former President, they automatically put them above the law, which nobody should ever be. Everyone should be held accountable under the law. I don't give a damn who they are.
 

interchange

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,022
2,872
136
The only people I see mentioning the dossier in years are Republicans trying to use it as an example of Democrat hypocrisy. It's been given the amount of credence it deserved, and there have since been much more thorough and productive explorations into the problematic links between Trump and Russia.
 
Reactions: hal2kilo and Pohemi

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
16,840
13,765
146
You do understand that innocent is the default position? It's not guilty then Mueller has to prove innocent. Don't forget that more investigators were punished for improprieties related to the "Trump-Russian" collusion investigation than were people found guilty of Russian collusion.
But Clinton is guilty? Interesting. It’s like your position on being innocent until proven guilty or guilty until proven innocent is fluid.

At any rate the Steele dossier was obviously more true than false. The Trump organization was beholden to Russia for money back in 2014, they continued to ask for help from Russia through out his admin and just yesterday Trump directly asked Putin for more help.

As a republican it is your job to get in line excuse me under the boot of your benevolent Russian overlords. All these posts where you seem to have a problem with Russia and Trump colluding is going to make you look like a RINO to your tribe. You need to get with that program or they’ll toss you out.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |