Isnt that as fair as mentioning someone might be of color it may also be semiphrasing a quote he read from one of those links, while I can question its validity it isnt really out of the norm is it? You might argue that a gay person would consider stepping forward twice given the rights hostile environment towards the lgbtq community and thus it took extra courage to do so. Shrugs.I really have no horse in this race, but I have to ask, what does gay have anything to do with anything?
Why were you compelled to mention that detail?
You don't know much about the pysche of the Russian people apparently. I'd be extremely suprised if he is ever held accountable. When you talk about messed up in the head, there are a lot of Russians that are just that unfortunately. There are a vast number of them that are going to think Putin can do no wrong until it gets much, much worse than it has. I had a pen pal I talked to regularly there a long time ago. She was intelligent and very western in most of her ideas. But when it came to Putin there was no way to talk any sense into her at all. There's a sense of respect there for power. Much more than even what you'd think the average Trumper thinks of Trump. It doesn't matter if it's corrupt power in the least bit. It was frustrating to explain and I eventually gave up on the subject. Otherwise you'd have had trouble knowing she was any different than an average girl here in the US.That's because all of that is fabricated (or compromised to the extent that fabrication cannot be discounted), and because the suffering of the Russians will end when Putin is brought before the World Court and held accountable for his crimes against humanity.
Yeah because it’s a big nothingburger of planted details and been discussed ad nauseam long before you decided to add your 2 cents. Not our fault you’re falling for the shiny object.and haven't bothered to mention anything about the laptop or the transcripts of the Whistleblowers.
You still haven't answered the following so I'll try for the 3rd time...The problem is the FBI verified it was his and then no one bothered to tell everyone else of that fact. In fact certain people decided to put out information that the entire thing was a Hoax when many of them knew that it wasn't. That doesn't sound suspicious either.
My stupid EC? I'll get right back to changing the constitution I wrote.
Alcohol remains unlawful under the age of 21 across the nation.. yet you can purchase a firearm. DUI's are illegal across the nations, why don't they ask about driving under the influence, or if you are addicted to alcohol, or an alcoholic? Why do they ask about other controlled substances, but not alcohol as the use of Alcohol, or being under the influence can be illegal as well, and just as dangerous, if not more dangerous as any other controlled substance? The point, is that question shouldn't be on the questionnaire at all.No.
Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance?Warning: The use or possession of marijuana remains unlawful under Federal law regardless of whether it has been legalized or decriminalized for medicinal or recreational purposes in the state where you reside.
You won’t get answers. I asked the same questions. 🤣You still haven't answered the following so I'll try for the 3rd time...
Since Rudy had the laptop at one time if there was anything on it that incriminated Joe why didn't Rudy just release it?
Gym Jordan had his let's get Biden committee why didn't he put the whistleblowers under oath in a public forum and subject to cross? Happens everyday in trials. Lt Col Vindman was a whistleblower at Trump's impeachment and that's what they did to get to the truth.
Lastly let me clarify something for you...
Definition of HOAX
to trick into believing or accepting as genuine something false and often preposterous… See the full definitionwww.merriam-webster.com
The laptop being Russian disinformation was not a hoax. Intel people had reason to believe it didn't exist turns out that was just wrong.
Trump colluding with the Russians was not a hoax. Don Jr took a meeting with the Russians to get dirt on Hillary. Also, his public statement "Russia if you are listening" and then within hours Democratic stolen documents were leaked. Unfortunately, Mueller didn't have enough to prove collusion in court.
Want examples of a hoax? Obama was born in Kenya or Democrats were grooming kids in gay pizza shops. No evidence whatsoever yet Pubs just made shit up and ran with it.
You read thru about half of them, getting a woody, because you believe what they say are factual. all while ignoring the many warning signs that they are not, many examples already presented to you, that you keep making up excuses for, or refuse to acknowledge the discrepancies that indicate they are not factual. You could go to the fiction section of any library, grab any book off the shelf, and most likely, you would find more factual information in that fictional book, than what you will find in those transcripts. Hence, why you have been accused of believing conspiracy theory propaganda, which is exactly what those transcripts are.Well he either did have authority to or didn't. Since he came back repeatedly telling the, no the DoJ this the DoJ that it would seem logical for them to assume that he wasn't in charge and or didn't have the authority.
I've read through about half of it and skimmed the rest. Good talk. Keep on keeping your head in the sand too. If nothing other than your viewpoint is possible It's not going to be worth the effort.
No.Isnt that as fair as mentioning someone might be of color it may also be semiphrasing a quote he read from one of those links, while I can question its validity it isnt really out of the norm is it? You might argue that a gay person would consider stepping forward twice given the rights hostile environment towards the lgbtq community and thus it took extra courage to do so. Shrugs.
Ok cool, but he is not posting a screenshot of him self in full KKK gear and we were sort of getting into the Hunter side of things again *without* this becoming a 20 vs 1 shouting match on a side track. Some times we *are* an echo chamber.No.
We move forward every time we don't see color or sexual preference or orientation as a difference worth mentioning. It does not add to the narrative unless somebody provides all that context, and that is the problem. Leave out those details or selectively include them to suit your goals, and that is what bigotry looks like.
I'll relate a story from my childhood. I told my mom about a new friend, James at school.
One day she was picking my up and I turned around and pointed " James is over there in the blue coat"
He was the only black child in a sea of anglo kids. I was literally oblivious to his color, and it was one of the proudest stories that my mom could tell about me. I was 6 and had not learned about racism yet.
I can't say that I have kept that innocent perspective as I became an adult. I can look back on it as a lesson.
Well, no. Not to you and me.But is it an echo chamber when it’s the truth?
I didn't write the laws. I just repeated what it asks. If you think it shouldn't be that's fine. I probably would agree. Maybe you should do something about changing it?Alcohol remains unlawful under the age of 21 across the nation.. yet you can purchase a firearm. DUI's are illegal across the nations, why don't they ask about driving under the influence, or if you are addicted to alcohol, or an alcoholic? Why do they ask about other controlled substances, but not alcohol as the use of Alcohol, or being under the influence can be illegal as well, and just as dangerous, if not more dangerous as any other controlled substance? The point, is that question shouldn't be on the questionnaire at all.
Have you bothered to read any of them at all yet? Or just the blanket it's not something I want to hear so I'll stick my head in the sand and I assume it's BS. It goes both ways.You read thru about half of them, getting a woody, because you believe what they say are factual. all while ignoring the many warning signs that they are not, many examples already presented to you, that you keep making up excuses for, or refuse to acknowledge the discrepancies that indicate they are not factual. You could go to the fiction section of any library, grab any book off the shelf, and most likely, you would find more factual information in that fictional book, than what you will find in those transcripts. Hence, why you have been accused of believing conspiracy theory propaganda, which is exactly what those transcripts are.
Well to be fair I got bombarded with about 100 posts calling me racists and basically KKK at the end. And I was a lot more interested in the Wagner Russia thing that had started and I didn't notice.You won’t get answers. I asked the same questions. 🤣
That's a good way to guarantee to you'll expand your horizon's. But if only listening to stuff you want to hear works for you go at it. I frequent other forums that some conservative posters act the same way too. They all believe it's the truth too.But is it an echo chamber when it’s the truth?
He was legally blind, not the same as a blind repairman. I'm legally blind without glasses these days. Months later that's not completely suprising that he couldn't1) Abandoned at the shop of a blind repairman by someone he could not identify.
2) He then gave copies of the contents to Rudy Giuliani, one of the least credible people on the planet.
3) Giuliani then attempted to shop it to news organizations
4) When news organizations requested access to the materials so they could verify they were genuine Giuliani refused.
It's kind of hard to respond the 20 different people at the same time. Especially when half are insulting you by the end. And like I mentioned elsewhere the Wagner/ Russia thing started and I spent most of the time there once I realized it.You still haven't answered the following so I'll try for the 3rd time...
One, they're not on trial. I mentioned in a previous post that I did agree after going to the House they should go back through the Senate and have a public forum.Gym Jordan had his let's get Biden committee why didn't he put the whistleblowers under oath in a public forum and subject to cross? Happens everyday in trials. Lt Col Vindman was a whistleblower at Trump's impeachment and that's what they did to get to the truth.
You have proof of this? Since you're demanding it I will as well.Lastly let me clarify something for you...
Definition of HOAX
to trick into believing or accepting as genuine something false and often preposterous… See the full definitionwww.merriam-webster.com
The laptop being Russian disinformation was not a hoax. Intel people had reason to believe it didn't exist turns out that was just wrong.
Lol, when they write a letter inferring it's disinformation in an attempt to swing an election but they have no actual proof that's not a conspiracy?Of course former intelligence officers wanted Biden to win. They knew Trump was a treasonous shitbag and a danger to our republic. This wasn’t a conspiracy.
No, this is what a real conspiracy looks like.Lol, when they write a letter inferring it's disinformation in an attempt to swing an election but they have no actual proof that's not a conspiracy?
So we're going to change the conspiracy because it's just not big enough of one? And muddle it with another issue? Whataboutism?No, this is what a real conspiracy looks like.
Do you think George Soros SuperPACs should be allowed to anonymously fund Republican primary candidates or Independents in order to tank Republicans? Because if this kinda thing is kosher (SCOTUS seems to think so) then that’s where we’re headed.
Several of the questions that have been shoved in my face are the complete opposite scenario and the response is just the same. So don't act like I'm alone there.Guys! There is totally something fishy going on here! Why wouldn’t democrats want to have hearings about a private citizen about concerns raised from an obvious political hit job designed to weaken Biden? Surely you guys think that such a hearing is important to get out in front of the American people!! History certainly doesn’t repeat itself, right? We all remember the super legit Benghazi hearings and investigations, all nine of them, remember all the important info that came from those? There is absolutely no way those were political hit jobs as well, it’s not like we have actual republicans saying as much!
Signed,
Both sides idiot who believes every conspiracy republicans put forth.
No, it's not a conspiracy. There was nothing hidden here. Writing a letter in attempt to swing an election is a completely legitimate activity. Were you unhappy with the outcome, that the treasonous shitbag lost?Lol, when they write a letter inferring it's disinformation in an attempt to swing an election but they have no actual proof that's not a conspiracy?
Just because you personally are happy with the outcome doesn't change what it is.