WarDemon666
Platinum Member
- Nov 28, 2000
- 2,224
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: warcrow
Hrm, didnt realize the 10,000 mile refule point. But, what about the extra carbons that get cute lose into the air during the hydrogen creation process? I'm being serious, not a smarta$$.
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: warcrow
A friend and I are having a debate on Hydrogen and cars. Let me get this straight?
Hydrogen can be acquired by two means:
- You extract it via hydrocarbons resulting in a lot carbons expelled into the air.
- The second way, you split H2O which requires a lot of electricity, only resulting in more work for coal-burning plants which completely removes all the benefits of the "clean" fuel.
- Hydrogen leaks a lot and turns steel brittle.
So riddle me this, Batman. Why in the hell does anyone think this is a GOOD idea for cars? There has to be some company lined up to benefit huge from this, right? Anyone else knowledgeable about this?
BMW thinks it's good.
Therefore it must be good.
Originally posted by: warcrow
true true....but this all takes time for effect, right?
Originally posted by: crazeinc
Hydrogen cars are extremely inefficient at this point in the game. Hopefully somebody will figure it out sooner than later so we don't have to invade any more countries in the middle east
Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
Originally posted by: Mo0o
it's not a good idea right now, hydrogen is extremely combustible so if there was a car accident it would well.. suck.
except that the second hydrogen hit the air it would become so "diluted" that there would be VERY little possibility.
and gas isnt combustible???
isnt it being combustible the whole point of using it in an internal COMBUSTION engine?
MIKE
Originally posted by: glugglug
Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
[
http://www.h2cars.biz/artman/publish/article_255.shtml there is one liquid hydrogen car in that list. but it happens to be a fuel cell and not an ICE
http://www.h2cars.biz/artman/publish/article_391.shtml more info on how liquid h2 will be used.
http://www.h2cars.biz/artman/publish/article_534.shtml bmw is banking on liquid h2.
And if you read through those completely you'll see they are talking about "a liquid fuel containing hydrogen" (i.e. propane or other hydrocarbons) and not pure hydrogen liquid.
To liquify hydrogen at room temperature takes 150,000 psi. I worked out this is the same as below 64 miles of water -- does it even get that deep anywhere? What kind of container would you suggest to withstand this pressure, without the container itself liquifying or reacting with the concentrated hydrogen?
Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
Originally posted by: Mo0o
it's not a good idea right now, hydrogen is extremely combustible so if there was a car accident it would well.. suck.
except that the second hydrogen hit the air it would become so "diluted" that there would be VERY little possibility.
and gas isnt combustible???
isnt it being combustible the whole point of using it in an internal COMBUSTION engine?
MIKE
Originally posted by: phonemonkey
Originally posted by: warcrow
Hrm, didnt realize the 10,000 mile refule point. But, what about the extra carbons that get cute lose into the air during the hydrogen creation process? I'm being serious, not a smarta$$.
If an alternative energy source is used (ie: small solar stations providing the electricity to break down the water) there wouldn't be any additional pollution released. I think the general concensus is that even if natural gas or oil is used to help split the water, it's still better for the environment than all of the cars and trucks on the road.
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
I think the next major fuel is going to be alcohol. It's possible to get alcohol from fermenting and distilling various plant matter, which means it's renewable. We know how to make an engine run on alcohol (and we're damned good at it). It's concievably possible to make most vehicles run on alcohol with only minor modifications. (about what was required for the R12 -> R134a conversions)
Sure, we're still creating CO2, but then again, we'd also be making alot of things that suck up CO2, like plants. Last I checked, plants dig lots of CO2.
Originally posted by: K1052
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
I think the next major fuel is going to be alcohol. It's possible to get alcohol from fermenting and distilling various plant matter, which means it's renewable. We know how to make an engine run on alcohol (and we're damned good at it). It's concievably possible to make most vehicles run on alcohol with only minor modifications. (about what was required for the R12 -> R134a conversions)
Sure, we're still creating CO2, but then again, we'd also be making alot of things that suck up CO2, like plants. Last I checked, plants dig lots of CO2.
A crop failure due to weather could put a little crimp in that plan.
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
Originally posted by: K1052
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
I think the next major fuel is going to be alcohol. It's possible to get alcohol from fermenting and distilling various plant matter, which means it's renewable. We know how to make an engine run on alcohol (and we're damned good at it). It's concievably possible to make most vehicles run on alcohol with only minor modifications. (about what was required for the R12 -> R134a conversions)
Sure, we're still creating CO2, but then again, we'd also be making alot of things that suck up CO2, like plants. Last I checked, plants dig lots of CO2.
A crop failure due to weather could put a little crimp in that plan.
You do realize, that there's more than one person who grows stuff.
Originally posted by: FFactory0x
Um. Didnt the Hidenburg blow up cause of hydrogen
Originally posted by: FFactory0x
Um. Didnt the Hidenburg blow up cause of hydrogen
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
I think the next major fuel is going to be alcohol. It's possible to get alcohol from fermenting and distilling various plant matter, which means it's renewable. We know how to make an engine run on alcohol (and we're damned good at it). It's concievably possible to make most vehicles run on alcohol with only minor modifications. (about what was required for the R12 -> R134a conversions)
Sure, we're still creating CO2, but then again, we'd also be making alot of things that suck up CO2, like plants. Last I checked, plants dig lots of CO2.