I am not proud of America, alright?

[SlingXShot]

(CNN)?Barack Obama blamed the 'conservative press' Wednesday for negative attacks on his wife Michelle.

?What happened was that the conservative press?Fox News and the National Review and columnists of every ilk?went fairly deliberately at her in a pretty systematic way,? Obama told Glamour Magazine.

http://politicalticker.blogs.c...r-attacks-on-michelle/

I am not proud of America at all... because of how its been past 8 years, a total disaster. Those who attack Michelle Obama are idiots about that we need to be patriotic, how can we be patriotic and love out country if the leaders treat it and us like crap....

Those people who only care about them selves and only try to make money for them selves are patriotic? (this is according to McCain supporters) This is such non sense, discrace.

If McCain gets elected, we will be in the same spot as before. You know a lot of McCain supporters know that, they just don't care because they are scared of Obama...

Why has McCain changed so much since 2000, because the corrupted Republican party. Everytime I watch McCain speak, he keeps going on with lies and lies and you know what I think, it is not him but his republican friends and those who wrote the speeches for him. They are totally controlling him, if he wasn't, he would not have changed from 2000. I won't admit Democrats are perfect, but far much better than the Republicans and safer.

(He keeps going on that middle class would have increased taxes (lie), he says obama gainst nuclear energy (lie), he says obama against inovation and electric cars (super lie) - obama wants to invest 150 billion dollars.)


It is just so sad, beyond sad what has happened to this country.

 

[Craig234]

Originally posted by: SlingXShot

(CNN)?Barack Obama blamed the 'conservative press' Wednesday for negative attacks on his wife Michelle.

?What happened was that the conservative press?Fox News and the National Review and columnists of every ilk?went fairly deliberately at her in a pretty systematic way,? Obama told Glamour Magazine.

http://politicalticker.blogs.c...r-attacks-on-michelle/

I am not proud of America at all... because of how its been past 8 years, a total disaster. Those who attack Michelle Obama are idiots about that we need to be patriotic, how can we be patriotic and love out country if the leaders treat it and us like crap....

Those people who only care about them selves and only try to make money for them selves are patriotic? (this is according to McCain supporters) This is such non sense, discrace.

If McCain gets elected, we will be in the same spot as before. You know a lot of McCain supporters know that, they just don't care because they are scared of Obama...

Why has McCain changed so much since 2000, because the corrupted Republican party. Everytime I watch McCain speak, he keeps going on with lies and lies and you know what I think, it is not him but his republican friends and those who wrote the speeches for him. They are totally controlling him, if he wasn't, he would not have changed from 2000. I won't admit Democrats are perfect, but far much better than the Republicans and safer.

(He keeps going on that middle class would have increased taxes (lie), he says obama gainst nuclear energy (lie), he says obama against inovation and electric cars (super lie) - obama wants to invest 150 billion dollars.)


It is just so sad, beyond sad what has happened to this country.

What's worse is how much better McCain is than any of the other major Republican candidates. Or more accurately, how much worse they were than McCain.

If we'd elected Rudy, I'm pretty sure all our money would have some logo mentioning 9/11 on it.

 

[jpeyton]

Originally posted by: Craig234
If we'd elected Rudy, I'm pretty sure all our money would have some logo mentioning 9/11 on it.

Rudy would have relocated his campaign HQ to ground zero and picked the Freedom Tower as his running mate.

 

[Robor]

Originally posted by: jpeyton

Originally posted by: Craig234
If we'd elected Rudy, I'm pretty sure all our money would have some logo mentioning 9/11 on it.

Rudy would have relocated his campaign HQ to ground zero and picked the Freedom Tower as his running mate.

Remember the Rudy & 9/11 jokes on The Jon Stewart show?

 

[SlingXShot]

Originally posted by: jpeyton

Originally posted by: Craig234
If we'd elected Rudy, I'm pretty sure all our money would have some logo mentioning 9/11 on it.

Rudy would have relocated his campaign HQ to ground zero and picked the Freedom Tower as his running mate.

I liked the guy in the beggining but later I realized I can't stand him...

 

[cubeless]

well of course it's that evil press, god forbid it would be what she said that's the problem...

?She?s the most honest person I know, she?s smart, she?s funny,? The Illinois senator said... well of course she is: everybody else he knows is a lying politician... and of course he thinks the truth is funny, he's a politician...

?I don?t have a thick skin when it comes to criticism of my wife,? Obama admitted. ?The problem is that rarely do these folks have the guts to say it to your face.? well of course they can't, he picks and chooses very carefully whom he'll let get close enuf to him to say anything...

 

[cubeless]

Originally posted by: SlingXShot

Originally posted by: jpeyton

Originally posted by: Craig234
If we'd elected Rudy, I'm pretty sure all our money would have some logo mentioning 9/11 on it.

Rudy would have relocated his campaign HQ to ground zero and picked the Freedom Tower as his running mate.

I liked the guy in the beggining but later I realized I can't stand him...

oohh, hope... maybe the same will happen with obama???

 

[SlingXShot]

Originally posted by: cubeless

Originally posted by: SlingXShot

Originally posted by: jpeyton

Originally posted by: Craig234
If we'd elected Rudy, I'm pretty sure all our money would have some logo mentioning 9/11 on it.

Rudy would have relocated his campaign HQ to ground zero and picked the Freedom Tower as his running mate.

I liked the guy in the beggining but later I realized I can't stand him...

oohh, hope... maybe the same will happen with obama???

It is the other way around buddy... I hate McCain more and more

 

[cubeless]

ever think that u might be a overly optimistic, easily disappointed, basically unhappy kind of guy? these are politicians we are talking about, after all... ;p

 

[SlingXShot]

Originally posted by: cubeless
ever think that u might be a overly optimistic, easily disappointed, basically unhappy kind of guy? these are politicians we are talking about, after all... ;p

I was happy in the 90's... they were great times.. under clinton administration, he didn't go to useless wars. We need a democratic president that won't attack a country just because he feels like....

 

[dmcowen674]

I was pleased to hear Obama personally go after Sean Hannity today.

Sean is not only NOT "a great American" as he calls himself but IMO a Traitor and should be treated as such.

He IMO creates material that is not protected under free speech but used to be considered slander and libel. It is no different than yelling fire in a theater and he should be in prison.

 

[Dari]

Sean Hannity is pure shit.

 

[nick1985]

Originally posted by: SlingXShot

Originally posted by: cubeless
ever think that u might be a overly optimistic, easily disappointed, basically unhappy kind of guy? these are politicians we are talking about, after all... ;p

I was happy in the 90's... they were great times.. under clinton administration, he didn't go to useless wars. We need a democratic president that won't attack a country just because he feels like....

Black Hawk Down?

 

[nageov3t]

Originally posted by: jpeyton

Originally posted by: Craig234
If we'd elected Rudy, I'm pretty sure all our money would have some logo mentioning 9/11 on it.

Rudy would have relocated his campaign HQ to ground zero and picked the Freedom Tower as his running mate.

:laugh:

that's one way to get the damn thing built.

 

[heyheybooboo]

Originally posted by: nick1985

Originally posted by: SlingXShot

Originally posted by: cubeless
ever think that u might be a overly optimistic, easily disappointed, basically unhappy kind of guy? these are politicians we are talking about, after all... ;p

I was happy in the 90's... they were great times.. under clinton administration, he didn't go to useless wars. We need a democratic president that won't attack a country just because he feels like....

Black Hawk Down?

Do you mean when President George H. W. Bush responded with Operation Restore Hope in December, 1992, when the vast majority of total personnel strength in Somalia was provided by the United States (some 25,000 out of a total of 37,000 personnel) ???

The Battle of Mogadishu was in early October, 1993.

This is the type of revisionist history we may expect from the Bush-iters on everthing from 9-11 to the illegal occupation of Iraq to illegal domestic wiretapping to torture and extraordinary rendition to .....

 

[fallout man]

Originally posted by: heyheybooboo

Originally posted by: nick1985

Originally posted by: SlingXShot

Originally posted by: cubeless
ever think that u might be a overly optimistic, easily disappointed, basically unhappy kind of guy? these are politicians we are talking about, after all... ;p

I was happy in the 90's... they were great times.. under clinton administration, he didn't go to useless wars. We need a democratic president that won't attack a country just because he feels like....

Black Hawk Down?

Do you mean when President George H. W. Bush responded with Operation Restore Hope in December, 1992, when the vast majority of total personnel strength in Somalia was provided by the United States (some 25,000 out of a total of 37,000 personnel) ???

The Battle of Mogadishu was in early October, 1993.

This is the type of revisionist history we may expect from the Bush-iters on everthing from 9-11 to the illegal occupation of Iraq to illegal domestic wiretapping to torture and extraordinary rendition to .....

You mean to say that Clinton didn't do it? :laugh:

 

[nick1985]

Originally posted by: heyheybooboo

Originally posted by: nick1985

Originally posted by: SlingXShot

Originally posted by: cubeless
ever think that u might be a overly optimistic, easily disappointed, basically unhappy kind of guy? these are politicians we are talking about, after all... ;p

I was happy in the 90's... they were great times.. under clinton administration, he didn't go to useless wars. We need a democratic president that won't attack a country just because he feels like....

Black Hawk Down?

Do you mean when President George H. W. Bush responded with Operation Restore Hope in December, 1992, when the vast majority of total personnel strength in Somalia was provided by the United States (some 25,000 out of a total of 37,000 personnel) ???

The Battle of Mogadishu was in early October, 1993.

This is the type of revisionist history we may expect from the Bush-iters on everthing from 9-11 to the illegal occupation of Iraq to illegal domestic wiretapping to torture and extraordinary rendition to .....

Bill Clinton was president in 1993, and if you read anything about the the battle of mog you would know that clinton played a role in the disaster that took place.

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: nick1985

Originally posted by: SlingXShot

Originally posted by: cubeless
ever think that u might be a overly optimistic, easily disappointed, basically unhappy kind of guy? these are politicians we are talking about, after all... ;p

I was happy in the 90's... they were great times.. under clinton administration, he didn't go to useless wars. We need a democratic president that won't attack a country just because he feels like....

Black Hawk Down?

That was the real Bushes war that Clinton inherited.

 

[JEDIYoda]

No it`s not allright!! America -- Love her or leave her!!

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
No it`s not allright!! America -- Love her or leave her!!

Love America, hate the fucks like Bush and those who support him in leading her astray.

 

[JD50]

Originally posted by: heyheybooboo

Originally posted by: nick1985

Originally posted by: SlingXShot

Originally posted by: cubeless
ever think that u might be a overly optimistic, easily disappointed, basically unhappy kind of guy? these are politicians we are talking about, after all... ;p

I was happy in the 90's... they were great times.. under clinton administration, he didn't go to useless wars. We need a democratic president that won't attack a country just because he feels like....

Black Hawk Down?

Do you mean when President George H. W. Bush responded with Operation Restore Hope in December, 1992, when the vast majority of total personnel strength in Somalia was provided by the United States (some 25,000 out of a total of 37,000 personnel) ???

The Battle of Mogadishu was in early October, 1993.

This is the type of revisionist history we may expect from the Bush-iters on everthing from 9-11 to the illegal occupation of Iraq to illegal domestic wiretapping to torture and extraordinary rendition to .....

Wow, that sounds kind of like how the Dems blame Bush for 9-11, even though he inherited all of that crap from Slick Willy.

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: JD50

Originally posted by: heyheybooboo

Originally posted by: nick1985

Originally posted by: SlingXShot

Originally posted by: cubeless
ever think that u might be a overly optimistic, easily disappointed, basically unhappy kind of guy? these are politicians we are talking about, after all... ;p

I was happy in the 90's... they were great times.. under clinton administration, he didn't go to useless wars. We need a democratic president that won't attack a country just because he feels like....

Black Hawk Down?

Do you mean when President George H. W. Bush responded with Operation Restore Hope in December, 1992, when the vast majority of total personnel strength in Somalia was provided by the United States (some 25,000 out of a total of 37,000 personnel) ???

The Battle of Mogadishu was in early October, 1993.

This is the type of revisionist history we may expect from the Bush-iters on everthing from 9-11 to the illegal occupation of Iraq to illegal domestic wiretapping to torture and extraordinary rendition to .....

Wow, that sounds kind of like how the Dems blame Bush for 9-11, even though he inherited all of that crap from Slick Willy.

Yeah it was Clinton's fault that Bush ignored those who warned him of the possibility of an attack of the magnitude of 9-11.

 

[QuantumPion]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: JD50

Originally posted by: heyheybooboo

Originally posted by: nick1985

Originally posted by: SlingXShot

Originally posted by: cubeless
ever think that u might be a overly optimistic, easily disappointed, basically unhappy kind of guy? these are politicians we are talking about, after all... ;p

I was happy in the 90's... they were great times.. under clinton administration, he didn't go to useless wars. We need a democratic president that won't attack a country just because he feels like....

Black Hawk Down?

Do you mean when President George H. W. Bush responded with Operation Restore Hope in December, 1992, when the vast majority of total personnel strength in Somalia was provided by the United States (some 25,000 out of a total of 37,000 personnel) ???

The Battle of Mogadishu was in early October, 1993.

This is the type of revisionist history we may expect from the Bush-iters on everthing from 9-11 to the illegal occupation of Iraq to illegal domestic wiretapping to torture and extraordinary rendition to .....

Wow, that sounds kind of like how the Dems blame Bush for 9-11, even though he inherited all of that crap from Slick Willy.

Yeah it was Clinton's fault that Bush ignored those who warned him of the possibility of an attack of the magnitude of 9-11.

Bush was only in office for 9 months on September 2001, and 3 of those months were spent cleaning up the mess the Clinton's left behind (e.g. vandalism at the white house, uncooperative bureaucrats, fallout from the election controversy, etc). 6 months was not enough time to undo the damage Clinton did to our intelligence gathering ability put in place to hide his own corrupt dealings.

 

[GTKeeper]

Originally posted by: QuantumPion

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: JD50

Originally posted by: heyheybooboo

Originally posted by: nick1985

Originally posted by: SlingXShot

Originally posted by: cubeless
ever think that u might be a overly optimistic, easily disappointed, basically unhappy kind of guy? these are politicians we are talking about, after all... ;p

I was happy in the 90's... they were great times.. under clinton administration, he didn't go to useless wars. We need a democratic president that won't attack a country just because he feels like....

Black Hawk Down?

Do you mean when President George H. W. Bush responded with Operation Restore Hope in December, 1992, when the vast majority of total personnel strength in Somalia was provided by the United States (some 25,000 out of a total of 37,000 personnel) ???

The Battle of Mogadishu was in early October, 1993.

This is the type of revisionist history we may expect from the Bush-iters on everthing from 9-11 to the illegal occupation of Iraq to illegal domestic wiretapping to torture and extraordinary rendition to .....

Wow, that sounds kind of like how the Dems blame Bush for 9-11, even though he inherited all of that crap from Slick Willy.

Yeah it was Clinton's fault that Bush ignored those who warned him of the possibility of an attack of the magnitude of 9-11.

Bush was only in office for 9 months on September 2001, and 3 of those months were spent cleaning up the mess the Clinton's left behind (e.g. vandalism at the white house, uncooperative bureaucrats, fallout from the election controversy, etc). 6 months was not enough time to undo the damage Clinton did to our intelligence gathering ability put in place to hide his own corrupt dealings.

Hey Quantum. Its hard to do work when you are on Vacation. Bush was on vacation in Texas from August 6th to August 25th of 2001. Really busy there for almost 3 weeks. REALLY BUSY. After he returned at the end of August that was his 54th day at his Ranch in Texas that year.

Give me a break.

 

[StageLeft]

Originally posted by: QuantumPion
Bush was only in office for 9 months on September 2001, and 3 of those months were spent cleaning up the mess the Clinton's left behind (e.g. vandalism at the white house, uncooperative bureaucrats, fallout from the election controversy, etc). 6 months was not enough time to undo the damage Clinton did to our intelligence gathering ability put in place to hide his own corrupt dealings.

Really? It took only 1/3rd of that to move troops into Afghanistan. Unfortunately, you seem to not be addressing the points Red clearly understands which is that the Bush administration at its highest levels received PLENTY of warning before 911 that something major was coming down. A key figurehead who had a particular disinterest in addressing the concerns that were being brought to her was Condi Rice.