Because justly, anyone with a functional brain would realize that if you believe there will be pci-e, ddr2 and other developing features supported on 754 there is no reason to pay attention at all to the debates over the upgradability of either socket. The debate exists based upon the possibility that 754 will not see all the features that will become standards soon enough. I don't have much of an opinion either way in fact, but when questions of the relevance of the arguement come up, you can only argue its relevance by assuming it is founded. As to your suggestion that I label my posts with "IMO", you might try reading what you quoted, since I said that 754's future support of developing features was uncertain. Which is about the only thing that can be said that isn't an opinion. I'm not sure why you have some vendetta against compairing the futures of 939 and 754. But you should pay better attention to what has been said, rather then your apparent fervent belief that I'm cutting 754 a raw deal, when I am only mentioning the discussion that's been going on over it for the past several months.
Gamingphreak, yes that is a Sis board.
Gamingphreak, yes that is a Sis board.