Originally posted by: IntelUser2000
Obviously we now know 2 things.
1. YOu are like 9 years old
2. YOu are not old enough to remember the beginnings of Intel (ie P1 P2 P3)
Also stability is not based on CPU, if any other part of your hardware is a POS thenyour system is, Processors have a suprisingly low impact on stability.
Oh yes I am old enough to remember the beginnings of Intel. Have you seen anybody that is 9 year old that comes here and argues about Intel vs. AMD? I haven't.
Pentium 1 got quickly surpassed by K6 which was cheaper
Pentium 2 also got surpassed by K6-2's which were also cheaper
Pentium 3 ALSO got surpassed by K6-3's which were cheaper and got owned when Athlons came out.
Okay, so they were RELATIVELY good CPU's. However that does not solve one thing. The past doesn't matter now. AMD and Athlon64's are so good now that you can forget all history of Intel's successes.
Is there any more I need to say?