zinfamous
No Lifer
- Jul 12, 2006
- 110,821
- 29,576
- 146
Actually, I can see this saving money in the long run. I saw a recipe the other day for beef brisket. So, instead of buying porterhouse steaks, t-bones, and ribeyes, I can get a cheaper, tougher cut like a brisket, and slow cook it for 2 days, then quickly sear it, resulting in a much cheaper dinner. I don't have the time to cook a brisket otherwise.
I haven't run mine for more than 3 hours at a time, and only ~3 gallons of water at that.
A full-size brisket probably requires a tank that can hold around 7 gallons, maybe (Just estimating; I have the same unit and while it isn't with me right now, I think it is rated at 6.5 gallons)
Anyway, I wonder what the electricity cost is of pushing that amount of water at ~150 F for 2 days...or can you even break down tissue and collagen at 150? Do you need to push it to at least 170 F to get some "Real BBQ"? You might be able to cut the time down with that, but you also deal with more water loss that needs to be replaced (though a simple lid minimizes evaporation loss)