Honestly, considering how a medium to long duration jury trial DOES inconvenience people as far as money goes, I wouldn't want to be on trial. While I know it's my civic duty, if it was anything more than a few days long trial, I don't think ANYONE other than someone who is on salary with a company and it's the company's policy to pay employee's full salary while on jury duty would NOT be thinking about all the bills that they have to pay and how much this is inconveniencing them. I know I would. And yes, I would answer honestly and if that led to me surving on a jury, so be it. But I can tell you that fact would distract me atleast part of the time if not most of the time for the trial. I know that's not good for the person on trial, but hey, I'm as human as the next guy. That is what is wrong with our jury system IMO. If there was some way to properly compensate someone for their lost wages so they wouldn't have any problems with serving on a trial, I think it would dramatically help out the system. And yes, that would cost alot of $$$ but I'm sure there's someway to try and implement something like this. Maybe make it a law that company's have to reimburse their employees for jury duty?? I don't know, just a suggestion.