No changes.
Some of the topics could be changed, but I don't see why they should be (celibacy for priests, women clergy), others, if they were to change, go against everything the church is to stand for (abortion/euthanasia).
It's not a damn democracy, people can either believe and follow the teachings, or leave if they don't believe human life is special, IMO.
Some of the articles are ridiculous, how the Pope (and by extension the church) are "responsible" for the spread of AIDs in Africa/the gay community because of the stance against condoms...where it is left out that the stance is for faithful marriages and celibacy outside of marriage. No, tons of promiscous sex would be responsible for that. Of course accountability for one's actions is such a quaint idea nowadays.
Not too mention, there aren't a whole lot of Catholics in Africa right now anyway nor is there much access to TV/radio.
Personally I hope a for strong pope, who even if he doesn't come up with any deep insightful commentaries, can simply crack down on enforcing and educating regarding the church's views; i.e., if you want to be Catholic, you are against abortion. End of story. I was pissed that our illustrious governor Jennifer Granholm came out with her BS sympathies for the pope as a Catholic (she's like Kerry, claims to be Catholic, yet doesn't understand some of the basic concepts and doctrines, like life=sacred, Pope=always right).
Err....so, that's my answer, I guess. No changes other than a better job perhaps of hammering home core beliefs AND why they are core (and unchangeable) beliefs.
Hopefully it's positive.