You do realize you're arguing with a fascist supporter who claims that there aren't any fascists? Like, you're totally wasting your time here. There's nothing to be learned, no minds to change, no reason to share with someone. Apologies will be issued, goalposts will be moved, and regardless of the outcome, new apologies will be made for the next fascist.I mean if it was Billy Bob from Alaska saying it it would be that.
It's the President of the United States of America with the whole weight of the 3 branches of government supporting him saying it.
And end running around the constitution by reinterpreting it is totally off the table?And it still ain't going to happen without changing the constitution. That's not an easy thing to do.
Yeah. I like talking to people I don't agree with.You do realize you're arguing with a fascist supporter who claims that there aren't any fascists? Like, you're totally wasting your time here. There's nothing to be learned, no minds to change, no reason to share with someone. Apologies will be issued, goalposts will be moved, and regardless of the outcome, new apologies will be made for the next fascist.
They don't disagree with you, they want you to die and don't have the integrity to say it for numerous reasons.Yeah. I like talking to people I don't agree with.
Yeah but they are going to want that if I talk to them or not!They don't disagree with you, they want you to die and don't have the integrity to say it for numerous reasons.
Have at 'em.
You aren't speaking with someone who has 278 posts and is here to have an honest conversation. You can see their account creation date and post count, right?Yeah but they are going to want that if I talk to them or not!
If you talk to people you can get them to articulate their position. This can sometimes be more enlightening for them if they haven't really thought about it before.
Because...Harris was black, Indian, and female.I’d love to hear why a DA, an AG, a senator, and a vice president were worse than a career grifter who inherited his wealth, was a failure in most of his business ventures (casino, airline, football team), who’s charities had to be disbanded because of fraud, who colluded with the Russians for election/misinformation help, who has many sexual assault allegations against them, and who slept with a porn star after his wife had a baby.
I look forward to this unique perspective.
And I wanna fuck Angie Dickinson. Let's see who gets lucky first.Hey all I ask for is *if* four years from now he refuses to leave office our usual republican members can say “no he has to leave office”
That’s all I want. Please reply if you agree.
He can just run for Prime Minster and win with 97% of the voteAnd doesn't get to stand for election again!
Well...she's 93 years old...so she probably can't fight back very well...And I wanna fuck Angie Dickinson. Let's see who gets lucky first.
He never has to run again...remember?He can just run for Prime Minster and win with 97% of the vote
Hence why I'm so furious at the establishment Democrats who forced Kamala on us and lost us the republic. The Dear Leader is above the law and anyone who thinks he isn't using that power is nuts.He never has to run again...remember?
User Clip: Trump: "In four years, You don't have to vote again. We'll have it fixed so good. You're not going to have to vote."
Trump: "In four years, You don't have to vote again. We'll have it fixed so good. You're not going to have to vote."www.c-span.org
And end running around the constitution by reinterpreting it is totally off the table?
I mean the guy in charge has publicly said he's up for this and he's loaded the only branch of government that can stop him with his cronies. You don't think that's at least something that he's thinking about?!
The rule is pretty clear "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice". There isn't any wiggle room in that sentence. It's a simple declarative statement. That leaves only one avenue for reelection, change the constitution. He'd have to be an extremely successful president for that to happen, I don't think he'll make that grade.And end running around the constitution by reinterpreting it is totally off the table?
I mean the guy in charge has publicly said he's up for this and he's loaded the only branch of government that can stop him with his cronies. You don't think that's at least something that he's thinking about?!
The 14th is pretty clear about birthright citizens but he's started the ball rolling on that!The rule is pretty clear "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice". There isn't any wiggle room in that sentence. It's a simple declarative statement. That leaves only one avenue for reelection, change the constitution. He'd have to be an extremely successful president for that to happen, I don't think he'll make that grade.
With the fascist majority on the Supreme Court willing to lie about everything, the amendment is what the fascists want it to be. The emolument clause of the Constitution is every bit as clear as the text above and the Supremes ruled that it doesn't say what it clearly says.The rule is pretty clear "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice". There isn't any wiggle room in that sentence. It's a simple declarative statement. That leaves only one avenue for reelection, change the constitution. He'd have to be an extremely successful president for that to happen, I don't think he'll make that grade.
Point for this discussion is @Greenman and @pcgeek11 have said he shall not serve another term.With the fascist majority on the Supreme Court willing to lie about everything, the amendment is what the fascists want it to be. The emolument clause of the Constitution is every bit as clear as the text above and the Supremes ruled that it doesn't say what it clearly says.
Of course he could simply have anyone who argued he couldn't become president again killed and that would be 100% legal. (or at least he would be immune from any sanction for doing it)The rule is pretty clear "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice". There isn't any wiggle room in that sentence. It's a simple declarative statement. That leaves only one avenue for reelection, change the constitution. He'd have to be an extremely successful president for that to happen, I don't think he'll make that grade.
Not here to kink shame but you do realize people age in real life right and don't stay looking like their movies from the 50s and 60s right?And I wanna fuck Angie Dickinson. Let's see who gets lucky first.
It's a line from the Sopranos and Junior means it as a compliment to her.Not here to kink shame but you do realize people age in real life right and don't stay looking like their movies from the 50s and 60s right?
Indeed.The 14th is pretty clear about birthright citizens but he's started the ball rolling on that!
And if it does happen, he'll shrug and say "I don't agree with that, he shouldn't have done it", and that will be about the extent of his protestations.And end running around the constitution by reinterpreting it is totally off the table?
I mean the guy in charge has publicly said he's up for this and he's loaded the only branch of government that can stop him with his cronies. You don't think that's at least something that he's thinking about?!
I was going to say, shit you must be older than me, I got over that thing a decade ago.Well...she's 93 years old...so she probably can't fight back very well...
The courts decision in that case was to wipe away the lower courts ruling without any further action. That was done without comment or dissent. None of the justices chose to say anything about it.With the fascist majority on the Supreme Court willing to lie about everything, the amendment is what the fascists want it to be. The emolument clause of the Constitution is every bit as clear as the text above and the Supremes ruled that it doesn't say what it clearly says.
We agree that the plain meaning of the emoluments clause clearly prohibited Trump taking personal gifts from other countries and he did it anyway. Does it really matter if they did nothing about it?The courts decision in that case was to wipe away the lower courts ruling without any further action. That was done without comment or dissent. None of the justices chose to say anything about it.