Jesus fucking Christ: you really are a worthless piece of sadistic filth. Prokaryotes deserve more respect than you. I fucking hope you haven't procreated, you monstrous little slime.
Gotta start somewhere.
You didn't even know what the asylum law said so what makes you think this claim is any more valid? Maybe you should try looking up actual laws before you opine on them.
MEISSNER: Well, so here is the situation. What - the reference that they're making is to a court settlement called the Flores decision, which took place in 1997. I'm very familiar with it because I signed it. And it was a settlement of a long-standing piece of litigation that said that children would be detained in the least restrictive setting possible and for the shortest period of time in order to be placed with either a family member or another care situation.
That law - that - and that's not a law. It's a court settlement, but it has the force of law. And it has been expanded by another court judgment just a few years ago to apply both to children and to families with children. So it is valid to say that it has the force of law. It is not actually a law. It would have - to change it would require legislation, which is what the Congress is talking about.
However, it is a judgment on the part of the administration how to implement that court decision. And this implementation of the court decision that says children need to be separated from their parents because their parent is being prosecuted - that has never happened before in the past from the time that this settlement took place through other administrations - both Democratic and Republican administrations.
Everybody has recognized that this issue is a balancing act - that we, of course, have a responsibility to enforce the laws at the border. But to those who are especially vulnerable - young people and families - there are other measures that can be taken that, of course, enforce the law but are not so excessively harsh as to violate a principle so fundamental as young children being in detention for long periods of time.
I don’t know. He seems like a massively gigantic piece of shit to me.Stop lying, you monstrous little shit.
Can anyone more well versed on the subject of asylum tell me why for example, a Guatemalan seeking asylum did not achieve it when they crossed the border into Mexico?
Damn, hadn't heard of toxic stress before but it makes sense. As bad as I feel for the kids, I can't even imagine what it's like to be tasked with taking care of these kids. Hats off to those workers who are doing their job to the best of their ability given a horrible situation.wapo is reporting the children cant be touched. So you have a bunch of infants and toddlers with no human contact. This is very bad for brain development as the famous baby monkey study showed us about eastern European children shelters.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-for-migrant-children/?utm_term=.7d3546c1bdda
wapo is reporting the children cant be touched. So you have a bunch of infants and toddlers with no human contact. This is very bad for brain development as the famous baby monkey study showed us about eastern European children shelters.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-for-migrant-children/?utm_term=.7d3546c1bdda
One woman tried to give her toys and books to calm her down, but even that shelter worker seemed frustrated, Kraft told The Washington Post, because as much as she wanted to console the little girl, she couldn’t touch, hold or pick her up to let her know everything would be all right. That was the rule, Kraft said she was told: They’re not allowed to touch the children.
Yup. Kraft is the president of the Amareican academy of Pediatrics and they have said that this is going to cause extreme and long lasting psychological damage to these kids.wapo is reporting the children cant be touched. So you have a bunch of infants and toddlers with no human contact. This is very bad for brain development as the famous baby monkey study showed us about eastern European children shelters.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-for-migrant-children/?utm_term=.7d3546c1bdda
The difference here is the Trump admin is charging everyone with a crime. A misdemeanour no less. How many people kid their kids seized for a misdemeanour? No other admin has ever done that. Then they want to blame the democrats. It’s all them. It’s all on them. They can’t even keep their own arguments straight and just keep moving the goal posts as each justification collapses when defending this.Do criminals get a free pass just because they drag their children into their crimes?
There is no right to illegal entry into the US.
It is the same for American citizens. If your children have no other known family and you are arrested, they go in the "system". You don't go to prison together and they are not left home alone. The problem for illegal immigrants is that they number in the millions. They overwhelm our systems by an order of magnitude. Even if we wanted to deport them back to their home country we either don't know who they are, or don't have the manpower assigned to get it done before another ten thousand show up.
The volume creates a backlog which necessitatesstorage"housing". Even assuming we were doing the right thing.
It's a bad situation that legislation can solve by allocating several more $billions to the task.
The word you are looking for is "misdemeanor".. Anyway, you could throw the men in gitmo and let the children be with their mothers and that would be a preferable solution than to this.Do criminals get a free pass just because they drag their children into their crimes?
There is no right to illegal entry into the US.
It is the same for American citizens. If your children have no other known family and you are arrested, they go in the "system". You don't go to prison together and they are not left home alone. The problem for illegal immigrants is that they number in the millions. They overwhelm our systems by an order of magnitude. Even if we wanted to deport them back to their home country we either don't know who they are, or don't have the manpower assigned to get it done before another ten thousand show up.
The volume creates a backlog which necessitatesstorage"housing". Even assuming we were doing the right thing.
It's a bad situation that legislation can solve by allocating several more $billions to the task.
The difference here is the Trump admin is charging everyone with a crime. A misdemeanour no less. How many people kid their kids seized for a misdemeanour?
And the difference is one needs to arrest and detain illegal aliens as they cross over. That is how you stop their crime in progress. You prevent the situation they put themselves in by building the wall. By doing everything possible to reduce the intake of people. And by increasing funds to assist those already here.
If you suggest we setup refugee camps and allow first time offenders to 1: stay out of prison and 2: keep families together, then I'd support that. But a solution requires border security. The idea of amnesty and assimilation are for those already living here. Not for the rest of the planet. Kids cannot be a free ticket into the US. We have every right to stop them from crossing. We can relieve the situation by properly addressing it in legislation.
Do criminals get a free pass just because they drag their children into their crimes?
There is no right to illegal entry into the US.
It is the same for American citizens. If your children have no other known family and you are arrested, they go in the "system". You don't go to prison together and they are not left home alone. The problem for illegal immigrants is that they number in the millions. They overwhelm our systems by an order of magnitude. Even if we wanted to deport them back to their home country we either don't know who they are, or don't have the manpower assigned to get it done before another ten thousand show up.
The volume creates a backlog which necessitatesstorage"housing". Even assuming we were doing the right thing.
It's a bad situation that legislation can solve by allocating several more $billions to the task.
Why do we need to give compassion to people who openly break the law by enter the country illegally?America: Where we treat the symptoms of a problem with the cruelest remedies available instead of the actual causes rooted in our policies. Until it affects white people then we suddenly rediscover compassion.
Those damn babies, bunch of crooks, LOCK THEM UP!Why do we need to give compassion to people who openly break the law by enter the country illegally?
Why do we need to give compassion to people who openly break the law by enter the country illegally?