I would warn abortion rights people, personal responsibility is going to be the answer, at the core of our problem as a nation is the complete lack of vision. The freedom of choice occurs when you are so irresponsible that you can't even use birth control, much less discretion.
And I would warn stupid people about being stupid but you and I both know that's not going to change anything so why don't you keep your stupidity to yourself and not get abortions and the pro choice people will keep their decisions to have abortions to themselves.
I resent the fact that minors are allowed to get abortions without parents consent. I know its allowed in Detroit area. I'm a provincial.
That's a totally separate issue.
Are the people ever going to be allowed to vote again on the subject of abortion? I don't see how we can be forever banned from voting on something this way. When was the last time any of you have had a chance to vote on this?
All rights are up for grabs, get enough people around your cause and anything is possible.
If your issue is with minors and parental consent then I suggest you focus on that. Many states have laws that restrict minors access to abirtions but at the same time allow for exceptions.
The foundations of society depend on a basic respect for human life and liberty. It requires an understanding and respect for personal responsibility, the traditional family and an expectation that people will pull their weight.
Republicans are rallying behind a bare-knuckle strategy to strip Planned Parenthood’s government support via a must-pass fall spending bill, a momentum shift that dramatically increases the chances of a government shutdown fight this fall.
The foundations of society depend on a basic respect for human life and liberty. It requires an understanding and respect for personal responsibility, the traditional family and an expectation that people will pull their weight.
If a parent catches their minor child smoking pot, should that parent be allowed to force the child to do intravenous drugs? If you answer no, then why should a parent be allowed to force a minor child to carry a pregnancy to term by denying them the right to an abortion?I resent the fact that minors are allowed to get abortions without parents consent. I know its allowed in Detroit area. I'm a provincial.
Are the people ever going to be allowed to vote again on the subject of abortion? I don't see how we can be forever banned from voting on something this way. When was the last time any of you have had a chance to vote on this?
If a parent catches their minor child smoking pot, should that parent be allowed to force the child to do intravenous drugs? If you answer no, then why should a parent be allowed to force a minor child to carry a pregnancy to term by denying them the right to an abortion?
The people are also never going to be allowed to vote on the concept of slavery. Rights are rights, they shouldn't be put to a vote. The tyranny of the majority should NEVER be something anyone is ok with.
Considering the fetus will be injecting hormones into the teen non-stop, I think it is a valid comparison.I'm sorry, are you honestly suggesting that not being allowed to kill a baby is at all similar to forced intravenous drug use?
-GP
I'm sorry, are you honestly suggesting that not being allowed to kill a baby is at all similar to forced intravenous drug use?
-GP
Traditional family? Nope.The foundations of society depend on a basic respect for human life and liberty. It requires an understanding and respect for personal responsibility, the traditional family and an expectation that people will pull their weight.
It's so cute when they call abortion "killing babies".
Are the people ever going to be allowed to vote again on the subject of abortion? I don't see how we can be forever banned from voting on something this way. When was the last time any of you have had a chance to vote on this?
Because it isn't up for a vote. Nor should it be. It isn't your business.
I'm sorry, if it isn't a human child (aka baby) then what organs are they harvesting?
CitizenKain said:Because it isn't up for a vote. Nor should it be. It isn't your business.
No need to apologize, it's called a "fetus". The organs are called "fetal organs".
Actually, the USA is a Constitutional Representative Republic, so I get to vote on matters and elect other people to vote on matters on my behalf with respect to the policy that the USA attends to. Given that my tax dollars are going to support this act, I actually do have a say just like any other person. That said, it shouldn't be up for a vote because purposefully killing another person should never be an option to begin with.
With respect to whether or not this matter is an individual's business, I'll have to respectfully disagree there as well. Regardless of what the courts ruled, if there is something that comes in direct contest with morality, it is the duty of good people to weigh in on the matter ("The Only Thing Necessary for the Triumph of Evil is that Good Men Do Nothing"). Add that to the above point and it, categorically, is my business.
-"a human being or animal in the later stages of development before it is born" Link
Actually, the USA is a Constitutional Representative Republic, so I get to vote on matters and elect other people to vote on matters on my behalf with respect to the policy that the USA attends to. Given that my tax dollars are going to support this act, I actually do have a say just like any other person. That said, it shouldn't be up for a vote because purposefully killing another person should never be an option to begin with.
With respect to whether or not this matter is an individual's business, I'll have to respectfully disagree there as well. Regardless of what the courts ruled, if there is something that comes in direct contest with morality, it is the duty of good people to weigh in on the matter ("The Only Thing Necessary for the Triumph of Evil is that Good Men Do Nothing"). Add that to the above point and it, categorically, is my business.
Fetus would be the stage in development that the person is at. The stage of development does not negate the species. With that in mind, let's get more specific - what type of fetus is this? Is it a dog fetus, human fetus, or bear fetus? (Hint: if you fast forward to what the fetus would grow into, you will find your answer)
-GP
Edit: Just in case you didn't believe my definition of fetus, here is the link to Merriam Webster and the copy and pasted definition from their site:
-"a human being or animal in the later stages of development before it is born" Link
With respect to whether or not this matter is an individual's business, I'll have to respectfully disagree there as well. Regardless of what the courts ruled, if there is something that comes in direct contest with morality, it is the duty of good people to weigh in on the matter ("The Only Thing Necessary for the Triumph of Evil is that Good Men Do Nothing"). Add that to the above point and it, categorically, is my business.