You forgot the first paragraph in the section titled "Prevalence of Control of Reproductive or Sexual Health by an Intimate Partner", not reproductive coercion/birth control sabotage.
The discussion was on the father, and going through the few pages, nobody mentioned reproductive coercion/birth control sabotage, although mindless did say "entrap", which some laughed at. It's strange that there is sympathy for the women but not for the men.
Now consider what roles men and women play in procreation, and why this comparison makes a difference.
Women can easily terminate the pregnancy and still have options if they refuse that. The financial burden doesn't necessarily hurt them in the same way as with men either e.g. getting put on the fast track for a Section 8 voucher.
Yeah you only post the women's side because you are a misogynist pig.
Many women have been victim to men who take off condoms during sex, especially when they get behind them or at other times. Or men who say they're going to pull out and don't. Anybody does that no matter what sex they should be held accountable
lol A great example of white knighting. See above.
That's not as true as it once was. If enough people make the same bad decision they want government to pay for it. Student loans come to mind.
It's funny that one of the argument angles here has been that it should be an effort of pooling resources between the parents, but I guarantee they would be all for Democrats teaming up with Romney and Rubio to give partial basic income for people with kids.