WelshBloke
Lifer
- Jan 12, 2005
- 30,989
- 8,701
- 136
Two humans that are naked and kissing would be considered a NSFW image. A link with a NSFW warning next to it would be fine, but not inline man.
It didn't show any dangly bits.
Two humans that are naked and kissing would be considered a NSFW image. A link with a NSFW warning next to it would be fine, but not inline man.
It didn't show any dangly bits.
dangly bits would be porn and not allowed at all. What you had was a NSFW image which isn't at the level of porn. Although porn is also NSFW, but NSFW encompasses more than that. There is a difference man.
Still not seeing why it was NSFW.
Was it the gun, the kiss or the guys with no tops on?
Be careful. Humble is a law expert in 32 states and 14 countries.
On a serious note: what do the gun grabbers propose someone do if an armed person comes up to said person in a parking lot and tries to rob them?
I'm not a gun grabber at all, but if someones got a gun pointed at you in a parking lot its probably best to just give them your wallet.
Ok
I prefer to keep my blood on the inside of me.
I'm just assuming that if a guy that has a gun pointed at me wants me to bleed I'm going to end up bleeding, if he just wants my wallet maybe I wont end up bleeding.
On a serious note: what do the gun grabbers propose someone do if an armed person comes up to said person in a parking lot and tries to rob them?
If they've already got a gun trained on you and the act of giving them your wallet is going to cause them to shoot you, what chance do you honestly give yourself to draw, aim and fire your own gun without being shot? FWIW, I agree with the principle that guns should be legal for self-defense, but in this scenario you've concocted, whether or not you're armed isn't going to make much of a difference.
hundreds of millions of guns are in private hands.
I think the best number has it at about 270 M, although this may be a couple of years old and sales have been gangbusters in the past few years, but there are probably right around 1 gun per person.I think it's actually over 1 billion.
While your way of thinking is foreign to me, I understand there are a lot of people that share your views.
Besides the basic fact that guns are a great hobby, they do also protect us from the government. One of the main reasons for the 2nd Amendment was and still is, to protect us from tyranny. I hope it never comes to that, but having a bunch of armed, pissed off civilians is always a great way to keep the government in check.
And my point is, if the government ever decided to disarm the citizens, it would be done. It would be bloody, it would most likely be swift and it would be done.
The idea that you could even have a minute's worth of fight is laughable.
And in some hands a gun makes a coward foolish and dangerous.
Congress, it seems, passed the version the OP included in his opening post but the version ratified by the States is a tad bit different... Fewer commas.
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
I looked in one of my old law texts and what I found is the wording as written by the OP... But, the notes I made in the margin indicate what I've shown above as being authenticated by Jefferson who was Sec. State at the time.
I then looked in the wiki place and there I find both listed....
So... dang, which IS the one the SCOTUS uses? It may not seem to be much of a difference, and it isn't, but I could make the case that the first bit above defines why and the second bit is the action or prohibition... which then might be a limiter of sorts.
I don't know what country you live in, but it would most definitely not. You think if the government was killing innocent civilians en mass the rebellion that would rise up to reset our republic would be contained?
There are a lot more people than there are soldiers or police. State and local governments would refuse to carry out the order, military divisions as well. Depending on how strong the tyrants power structure would be there could be civil war, or the swift capture and trial for treason, or a new constitutional convention.
I have no doubt that the people would be triumphant though.
or if ya know, the international media ignores it, like they are in Venezuela right now, it could be 'easier'
but I doubt it would go down easy here. at all.