I voted for McCain

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

alien42

Lifer
Nov 28, 2004
12,723
3,132
136
Originally posted by: tealk
My heart was broken this morning. Not because Obama was elected president, but of the way ?Christians? are reacting to the news. God?s word calls us to lift up our leaders ? regardless of their political race.
I was praying on the way to work this morning ? praying for our new president-to-be and America. When I was done, I turned on the radio to a local Christian radio station and just listened to what was being said. The radio hosts ? bless their hearts - were doing their best to remind us as Christians what we are called to. We are called to simply trust in the Lord. I began to sob in the car and I really don?t even know why. I?ve never been this emotional about politics before. But I truly believe the Lord was breaking my heart. The radio hosts were talking about how some of their closest ?Christian? friends are being so terribly bitter and angry toward the results of the election. My heart broke! A woman called into the show and expressed that she had voted for McCain and how terribly sad she was that America had lost sight of what really matters on issues such as human life, marriage, and stem cell research.
I don?t think I really grasped what America has come to until this morning. Aaron and I were talking a couple weeks ago about how it seems that American?s ? especially the younger generation ? think ?it?s cool? to be liberal and forget about everything this country was founded on.
Again, I am not upset that Obama was elected president. I vow, as a Christian, to pray for him as I would any president. The thing that saddens me is how ?Christians? are reacting, and how Americans just don?t seem to care about moral issues. I think that?s why I was sobbing on the way to work today. I truly believe the Lord was breaking my heart and reminding me more than ever, that in today?s world, it?s time to be BOLD and to stand for what is right!
The radio host said something that I want to send out to all of you. He said, ?America may have a new president, and he may not stand for the issues we as Christians stand for, but we still have a King! And He is seated at the right hand of God!? Amen!
Please join me in lifting up in prayer our country, and our new president, Barack Obama, remembering the Lord is still in control!
if your morals are those reflected by GWB then please keep them to yourself. as a non-christian my moral standards seem to quite a bit higher then those passed as such over the past decade. your God would love for you to learn from those mistakes. instead of praying for Obama, get out and do something productive to be a part of the new vision.
 

Eeezee

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2005
9,922
0
0
Originally posted by: eleison
Originally posted by: tealk
My heart was broken this morning. Not because Obama was elected president, but of the way ?Christians? are reacting to the news. God?s word calls us to lift up our leaders ? regardless of their political race.
I was praying on the way to work this morning ? praying for our new president-to-be and America. When I was done, I turned on the radio to a local Christian radio station and just listened to what was being said. The radio hosts ? bless their hearts - were doing their best to remind us as Christians what we are called to. We are called to simply trust in the Lord. I began to sob in the car and I really don?t even know why. I?ve never been this emotional about politics before. But I truly believe the Lord was breaking my heart. The radio hosts were talking about how some of their closest ?Christian? friends are being so terribly bitter and angry toward the results of the election. My heart broke! A woman called into the show and expressed that she had voted for McCain and how terribly sad she was that America had lost sight of what really matters on issues such as human life, marriage, and stem cell research.
I don?t think I really grasped what America has come to until this morning. Aaron and I were talking a couple weeks ago about how it seems that American?s ? especially the younger generation ? think ?it?s cool? to be liberal and forget about everything this country was founded on.
Again, I am not upset that Obama was elected president. I vow, as a Christian, to pray for him as I would any president. The thing that saddens me is how ?Christians? are reacting, and how Americans just don?t seem to care about moral issues. I think that?s why I was sobbing on the way to work today. I truly believe the Lord was breaking my heart and reminding me more than ever, that in today?s world, it?s time to be BOLD and to stand for what is right!
The radio host said something that I want to send out to all of you. He said, ?America may have a new president, and he may not stand for the issues we as Christians stand for, but we still have a King! And He is seated at the right hand of God!? Amen!
Please join me in lifting up in prayer our country, and our new president, Barack Obama, remembering the Lord is still in control!


Interesting perspective -- I thought Obama was the Messiah...

I've only ever heard Republicans making that claim, in sarcasm of course. I've never actually heard anyone literally believe it. I think it's humorous.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: tealk
My heart was broken this morning. Not because Obama was elected president, but of the way ?Christians? are reacting to the news. God?s word calls us to lift up our leaders ? regardless of their political race.
I was praying on the way to work this morning ? praying for our new president-to-be and America. When I was done, I turned on the radio to a local Christian radio station and just listened to what was being said. The radio hosts ? bless their hearts - were doing their best to remind us as Christians what we are called to. We are called to simply trust in the Lord. I began to sob in the car and I really don?t even know why. I?ve never been this emotional about politics before. But I truly believe the Lord was breaking my heart. The radio hosts were talking about how some of their closest ?Christian? friends are being so terribly bitter and angry toward the results of the election. My heart broke! A woman called into the show and expressed that she had voted for McCain and how terribly sad she was that America had lost sight of what really matters on issues such as human life, marriage, and stem cell research.
I don?t think I really grasped what America has come to until this morning. Aaron and I were talking a couple weeks ago about how it seems that American?s ? especially the younger generation ? think ?it?s cool? to be liberal and forget about everything this country was founded on.
Again, I am not upset that Obama was elected president. I vow, as a Christian, to pray for him as I would any president. The thing that saddens me is how ?Christians? are reacting, and how Americans just don?t seem to care about moral issues. I think that?s why I was sobbing on the way to work today. I truly believe the Lord was breaking my heart and reminding me more than ever, that in today?s world, it?s time to be BOLD and to stand for what is right!
The radio host said something that I want to send out to all of you. He said, ?America may have a new president, and he may not stand for the issues we as Christians stand for, but we still have a King! And He is seated at the right hand of God!? Amen!
Please join me in lifting up in prayer our country, and our new president, Barack Obama, remembering the Lord is still in control!
:roll: Glad I'm an Atheist so I don't have to deal with this irrational nonsense.
 

PotatoMAN

Member
Apr 27, 2002
29
0
0
I really wish there wasn't so much hatred on this forum. I think the problem is that people tend to get blinded with the tasks and occurrences at hand and fail to take a step back and look at the situation. Christians/non-christians all have a part in this failure.

The problem is America has a tainted democracy that is running on a two party system. I feel this needs to be reworked, that the current voting practices are dated, and people are generally more educated or have more access to information than ever before. We need to embrace this power in the people and we need a government that does right by it.

Tealk is simply a product of the two party system. As is are most of us. The Christians tend to get clumped under the Republican umbrella because it is a huge demographic. And, unfortunately, because they tend to be followers and less of questioners. This doesn't have to be this way, tealk, and I beg you to always ask questions. You can shift them into your understanding of the world through your beliefs, but if you stop searching for the truth you will never find it. A wonderful guy I saw on the Colbert Report (I suck, I get my news from here) is Peter Gomes - a Harvard theologian that is one of the few guests I felt could keep up with Colbert. He is smart, Christian (sorry if I get my denominations all grouped up under "Christian" - I also suck with this knowledge; I tend to assume all followers of Christ are Christian), and witty.

Those of us who attack tealk for supporting his beliefs in a major party platform because of unrelated policy measures are also wrong. I have a hard time drawing the connection from followers of Christ and the Bible to our current Republican party's agenda of propagating capitalism at all costs. Then again, I am not Christian nor have I read the whole Bible, so maybe those connections are there and I missed them. I just think it is an emergent characteristic of a two party platform that doesn't work very well.

I didn't vote for McCain, or Obama. In fact, I didn't vote (shoot me please, I forgot to re-register where I live). Anyway, I am happy and confident that America did choose a new, smart, brave, and awesome new leader for her. If I did vote, I probably would have voted for Ron Paul, but I really think we can do better.
 

zoiks

Lifer
Jan 13, 2000
11,787
3
81
I voted for Obama since we need a new foriegn policy and someone who can work with countries rather than bully them in a corner.
 

Xavier434

Lifer
Oct 14, 2002
10,373
1
0
Originally posted by: PotatoMAN
I really wish there wasn't so much hatred on this forum. I think the problem is that people tend to get blinded with the tasks and occurrences at hand and fail to take a step back and look at the situation. Christians/non-christians all have a part in this failure.

The problem is America has a tainted democracy that is running on a two party system. I feel this needs to be reworked, that the current voting practices are dated, and people are generally more educated or have more access to information than ever before. We need to embrace this power in the people and we need a government that does right by it.

Tealk is simply a product of the two party system. As is are most of us. The Christians tend to get clumped under the Republican umbrella because it is a huge demographic. And, unfortunately, because they tend to be followers and less of questioners. This doesn't have to be this way, tealk, and I beg you to always ask questions. You can shift them into your understanding of the world through your beliefs, but if you stop searching for the truth you will never find it. A wonderful guy I saw on the Colbert Report (I suck, I get my news from here) is Peter Gomes - a Harvard theologian that is one of the few guests I felt could keep up with Colbert. He is smart, Christian (sorry if I get my denominations all grouped up under "Christian" - I also suck with this knowledge; I tend to assume all followers of Christ are Christian), and witty.

Those of us who attack tealk for supporting his beliefs in a major party platform because of unrelated policy measures are also wrong. I have a hard time drawing the connection from followers of Christ and the Bible to our current Republican party's agenda of propagating capitalism at all costs. Then again, I am not Christian nor have I read the whole Bible, so maybe those connections are there and I missed them. I just think it is an emergent characteristic of a two party platform that doesn't work very well.

I didn't vote for McCain, or Obama. In fact, I didn't vote (shoot me please, I forgot to re-register where I live). Anyway, I am happy and confident that America did choose a new, smart, brave, and awesome new leader for her. If I did vote, I probably would have voted for Ron Paul, but I really think we can do better.

This has nothing to do with a 2 party system. This has everything to do with evangelicals being permitted to bring their religion into government where it should never have been in the first place. That's the real problem. A 10 party system will not change how all of these people feel about their religion and its influence on government.
 

Aikouka

Lifer
Nov 27, 2001
30,383
912
126
Originally posted by: Xavier434
The child is the responsibility of his family. I am the head of his family. Therefore, I am in charge of him and am very much responsible for him. His mother is obviously more responsible according to the law, but not according to my family. His mother cannot afford to provide him with health insurance let alone insurance for herself without my help.

Hey! But that's ok right? It's not like I have to worry because now I can just take him to the emergency room which costs the people of America a shit ton more than it would if they continue to allow me to insure him through my employer or through something like Obama's future healthcare plan.

Woah there, el tigre. I commented on and asked about semantics being used and about some proposition that I have no idea about (as I may be an east coaster, but I am quite far away from Florida).

I'm looking at some information online about Domestic Partnerships in Florida ( http://www.pbcountyclerk.com/c...il/domesticpartner.htm ) and wow... this sounds rather odd. It literally sounds like it's not much more than a glorified roommate based on the criteria to establish one.

To be honest, after reading those simplistic criteria, I'm really not so sure it's a good idea either.... My initial reaction has nothing to do with homosexuals at all, but rather possible exploitation to get easy insurance from someone. I'll have to think about it.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: PotatoMAN
Tealk is simply a product of the two party system.
Actually I think he's a product of fanatical Religious Fundamentalism.

 

Xavier434

Lifer
Oct 14, 2002
10,373
1
0
Originally posted by: Aikouka
Originally posted by: Xavier434
The child is the responsibility of his family. I am the head of his family. Therefore, I am in charge of him and am very much responsible for him. His mother is obviously more responsible according to the law, but not according to my family. His mother cannot afford to provide him with health insurance let alone insurance for herself without my help.

Hey! But that's ok right? It's not like I have to worry because now I can just take him to the emergency room which costs the people of America a shit ton more than it would if they continue to allow me to insure him through my employer or through something like Obama's future healthcare plan.

Woah there, el tigre. I commented on and asked about semantics being used and about some proposition that I have no idea about (as I may be an east coaster, but I am quite far away from Florida).

I'm looking at some information online about Domestic Partnerships in Florida ( http://www.pbcountyclerk.com/c...il/domesticpartner.htm ) and wow... this sounds rather odd. It literally sounds like it's not much more than a glorified roommate based on the criteria to establish one.

To be honest, after reading those simplistic criteria, I'm really not so sure it's a good idea either.... My initial reaction has nothing to do with homosexuals at all, but rather possible exploitation to get easy insurance from someone. I'll have to think about it.

I'm sorry. I am just incredibly pissed off that so many people in my state and a few on these forums think that they have the right to do this to me and my family when the outcome makes zero real difference in their lives other than knowing that gays will not be recognized by the state as married.

You need to remember the purpose of giving these privileges to those who are married in the first place. The purpose is to promote family unity. Why would anyone support giving married couples these privileges and not support giving other family units the same privileges just because their union is not legally recognized by the state?

Keep in mind that you cannot just walk up to the county office and say, "Hello! I want you make us Domestic Partners please. Ok, thanks! See you later." and expect it to happen. You have to provide documented proof that the two of you are fiscally responsible for each other and have been for while. You have to prove that you do in fact live together. You have to provide lots of things like that. I know the language on that site says that you must "agree" to many things, but the reality is that you need to "prove" a ton of stuff.
 

Chunkee

Lifer
Jul 28, 2002
10,391
1
81
Originally posted by: ThePresence
And I would again, if he were running against an unknown such as Obama.
However, I must say I have never seen such emotion, such an outpouring of fervor for a man. I missed JFK, so I have never seen a man able to move so many so much with his words. He has an inborn power to move people, even if he were white. It's not his color, it's his skill and talent. I am fearful of what he will do but I hope he does well. All Americans should hope for that, regardless of party and color.

How very nice for you. blog.idiot.com is the other way
 

ThePresence

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
27,727
16
81
Originally posted by: Chunkee
Originally posted by: ThePresence
And I would again, if he were running against an unknown such as Obama.
However, I must say I have never seen such emotion, such an outpouring of fervor for a man. I missed JFK, so I have never seen a man able to move so many so much with his words. He has an inborn power to move people, even if he were white. It's not his color, it's his skill and talent. I am fearful of what he will do but I hope he does well. All Americans should hope for that, regardless of party and color.

How very nice for you. blog.idiot.com is the other way

Thank you for your insight.
 

ScottMac

Moderator<br>Networking<br>Elite member
Mar 19, 2001
5,471
2
0
Originally posted by: brencat
Originally posted by: bozack
Voted against Obama and for McCain, would have preferred Romney
+1

Or at the very minimum, Romney as VP to give economic-issue credibility. Because when the sh!t hit the fan 2 months ago, McCain was caught with his pants down.

Yeah, for me it was more a vote against BHO then for McCain. I grew up in Michigan, so the Romney name is familiar. His Old Man was a pretty decent governor. That would've been jus' fine with me too.


 

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
Originally posted by: Chunkee
How very nice for you. blog.idiot.com is the other way

advertising your personal blog on here is against forum rules
 

Pneumothorax

Golden Member
Nov 4, 2002
1,181
23
81
Voted for McCain AND
I also voted no on 8, as it doesn't affect me. I don't believe in enforcing my beliefs on someone else. Also, the "But the children?!" argument doesn't work for me as kids are exposed to Homosexuality constantly in the media and in real life here in california. I really can't believe that proposition passed in the most liberal state of the Union.
It's also ironic that Obama factor may have been a big factor for passage for No. 8 as most AA's are socially conservative.
Finally, Xavier why don't you just marry your GF then?
 

Xavier434

Lifer
Oct 14, 2002
10,373
1
0
Originally posted by: Pneumothorax
Finally, Xavier why don't you just marry your GF then?

Several reasons.

1. She would lose all of her financial aid for college.
2. We would lose an additional $3000-$4000 in taxes.
3. There is other insurance that my family has which we would not qualify for if we got married.


There are a few others too, but they are not as important. Believe me. It is not because I don't want to do it and some day I will hopefully be able to without making major sacrifices.

That kind of money is going towards my stepson's college and other well being.
 

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
Originally posted by: Xavier434
Originally posted by: Pneumothorax
Finally, Xavier why don't you just marry your GF then?

Several reasons.

1. She would lose all of her financial aid for college.
2. We would lose an additional $3000-$4000 in taxes.
3. There is other insurance that my family has which we would not qualify for if we got married.


There are a few others too, but they are not as important. Believe me. It is not because I don't want to do it and some day I will be able to without making major sacrifices hopefully.

Well then you are living in sin and deserve what you get. (from the perspective of the anti-gay marriage people anyway)
 

Svnla

Lifer
Nov 10, 2003
17,986
1,388
126
As an independent, I voted for MC not because I have anything personal against BO but I don't want higher taxes on my dividends/capital gains/savings/investment gains/etc. and my potential of much higher income down the road.

Successfull immigrants like myself prefer the government leave its greedy hands out of our hard earned money and not reward the lazy.

Edit: Honestly, I hope BO and Dem control congress won't screw the US up, for our sake. If they will do what they say they are planning to do per their campaign, then they will have my vote next time. I will wait and see.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
173
106
Originally posted by: Xavier434
-snip-
bigot evangelical pieces of shit
-snip-
The child is the responsibility of his family. I am the head of his family. Therefore, I am in charge of him and am very much responsible for him. His mother is obviously more responsible according to the law, but not according to my family. His mother cannot afford to provide him with health insurance let alone insurance for herself without my help.

Hey! But that's ok right? It's not like I have to worry because now I can just take him to the emergency room which costs the people of America a shit ton more than it would if they continue to allow me to insure him through my employer or through something like Obama's future healthcare plan.

Wow, that's one heck of a rant.

So your girlfriend can't afford health insurance for her and it's whose fault again?

I don't consider myself an evangelical or whatever, but I sure as heck don't see why your employer should have to pay for that kids health insurance simply because you *like* the mother and/or it would be nice to have someone else pay for your personal life decisions.

You're in charge of the kid? Umm, no you're not. "Your family's" rules are just that, your family's - you sure seem to think you have the ability to make up *rules* and have everybody else abide by them.

If the mother is a low income earner, Medicaid is available. FL also has an SCHIP program.

IMO, you should stop hating on other people, evangelicals or whomever, for the kid's lack of health insurance. Man-up and get the kid on Medicaid, SCHIP or just buy a policy (health insurance for kids is typically very inexpensive. I googled for my area and the quote was $80 a month).

Oh, and for Chrit's sake, you don't need to go the dang emergency room if that is your complaint - there are plenty of walk-in clinics all over the freakin country. I know, I'm self-employed and self-insured and my family (kid included) use them. There's no need to use the emergency room unless there's a bona-fide emergency.

Fern
 

Aikouka

Lifer
Nov 27, 2001
30,383
912
126
Originally posted by: Xavier434
Several reasons.

1. She would lose all of her financial aid for college.
2. We would lose an additional $3000-$4000 in taxes.
3. There is other insurance that my family has which we would not qualify for if we got married.


There are a few others too, but they are not as important. Believe me. It is not because I don't want to do it and some day I will hopefully be able to without making major sacrifices.

That kind of money is going towards my stepson's college and other well being.

So, in other words, "I want some of the benefits (i.e. medical benefits) of marriage without the downsides." Not tryin' to be an ass, but that's really all I see with those points you mentioned....

EDIT: Fumbled up a word or two like Obama and a teleprompter .
 

ericlp

Diamond Member
Dec 24, 2000
6,134
223
106
damn dude...

Interesting read... and that is HEAVY .... Thanks for sharing, but you should consider changing religions or getting some sort of professional help to curb your addiction.

 

Xavier434

Lifer
Oct 14, 2002
10,373
1
0
Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: Xavier434
-snip-
bigot evangelical pieces of shit
-snip-
The child is the responsibility of his family. I am the head of his family. Therefore, I am in charge of him and am very much responsible for him. His mother is obviously more responsible according to the law, but not according to my family. His mother cannot afford to provide him with health insurance let alone insurance for herself without my help.

Hey! But that's ok right? It's not like I have to worry because now I can just take him to the emergency room which costs the people of America a shit ton more than it would if they continue to allow me to insure him through my employer or through something like Obama's future healthcare plan.

Wow, that's one heck of a rant.

So your girlfriend can't afford health insurance for her and it's whose fault again?

I don't consider myself an evangelical or whatever, but I sure as heck don't see why your employer should have to pay for that kids health insurance simply because you *like* the mother and/or it would be nice to have someone else pay for your personal life decisions.

You're in charge of the kid? Umm, no you're not. "Your family's" rules are just that, your family's - you sure seem to think you have the ability to make up *rules* and have everybody else abide by them.

If the mother is a low income earner, Medicaid is available. FL also has an SCHIP program.

IMO, you should stop hating on other people, evangelicals or whomever, for the kid's lack of health insurance. Man-up and get the kid on Medicaid, SCHIP or just buy a policy (health insurance for kids is typically very inexpensive. I googled for my area and the quote was $80 a month).

Oh, and for Chrit's sake, you don't need to go the dang emergency room if that is your complaint - there are plenty of walk-in clinics all over the freakin country. I know, I'm self-employed and self-insured and my family (kid included) use them. There's no need to use the emergency room unless there's a bona-fide emergency.

Fern

Her and I don't just "like" each other. We are Domestic Partners according to law in my county and the state of FL. Big difference.

Do you believe that married couples should be offered these kinds of benefits through their employers as a type of payment for working for them? If you do not then we have nothing further to discuss. However, if you believe that, then why do you believe that domestic partners and their dependents shouldn't? Keep in mind that domestic partners still work and pay for that insurance just like married couples do. It's not like we are getting it for free. I pay for part of it and my employer pays for the rest just like any other working married couple's situation.

Lastly, there is no private health insurance for kids that is both affordable for me and even remotely worth paying for as opposed to just banking the cash so scratch that one. I have no clue where this $80/month comes from. Hell, there were even some insurances that I researched whose prices were at least close to being reasonable except pretty much no one accepted it in my area even though I live in a high population density area.


Originally posted by: Aikouka
Originally posted by: Xavier434
Several reasons.

1. She would lose all of her financial aid for college.
2. We would lose an additional $3000-$4000 in taxes.
3. There is other insurance that my family has which we would not qualify for if we got married.


There are a few others too, but they are not as important. Believe me. It is not because I don't want to do it and some day I will hopefully be able to without making major sacrifices.

That kind of money is going towards my stepson's college and other well being.

So, in other words, "I want some of the benefits (i.e. medical benefits) of marriage without the downsides." Not tryin' to be an ass, but that's really all I see with those points you mentioned....

EDIT: Fumbled up a word or two like Obama and a teleprompter .

Benefits? There is no financial benefit to get married after you crunch the numbers anymore for most people. The extra taxes that I would have to pay alone make it not worth it not to mention the other points I listed. The problem is that the marriage laws are draconian and need to be revised. They were originally put into place in order to give the American people incentive to get married which in turn was to give incentive and promote family unity. Things have changed so much since then that what was once an incentive is now a penalty. What's the point?

This is not the same thing as a hand out. All I am asking for is to be able to work at my job to get my paycheck and benefits just like married couples are able to do as long as I maintain my legal domestic partnership. Why is that a problem? Why should the state get in the way of that based on someone else's religious beliefs concerning homosexuals? Name one good reason why what I want harms anyone?
 

ericlp

Diamond Member
Dec 24, 2000
6,134
223
106
Originally posted by: Possessed Freak
3 for 3 voted for losers. I wonder if this is the start of a trend for me. Will I ever pick the winner? Maybe I need to start voting for the worst option so that I hex it and the best is elected in...

So let me get this straight....

You voted for Gore, Kerry.... Then you switched parties at their lowest point in history and voted for a man that votes the same way bush votes????????

How the hell does that work...? I'd like to hear why you switched and didn't vote for Obama, what was the reason?

 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |