- Nov 9, 2012
- 32
- 0
- 0
what is better for gaming?? i3-3220 or fx-6100 or a10-5800k?? i need to know it fast D:
Depends on your budget. If you use a discrete graphics card then the FX6300 is the best. If you don't then the 5800K wins hands-down...
The i3 will have lower power consumption then either if that matters. But the integrated GPU is HOPELESS for gaming...
fx-6300 its not on my list its only i3-3220 or fx-6100 or a10-5800k..im using HD7750
Are you planning to overclock?
What's your graphics card?
Power supply?
Gaming resolution?
What games do you play?
yea we know its not on the list but its the best option
but how, there's no stock of fx 6300 on the stores here, so its just i3-3220 or fx-6100 or a10-5800k, thinking that there is no fx 6300 in the world yet
In that case go with the i3, you won't regret it...
If you want a MB-recommendation something B75-based is a good starting point...
In that case go with the i3, you won't regret it...
If you want a MB-recommendation something B75-based is a good starting point...
but how, there's no stock of fx 6300 on the stores here, so its just i3-3220 or fx-6100 or a10-5800k, thinking that there is no fx 6300 in the world yet
Where are you buying from? Don't get a H61 board, that's a last gen chipset and won't support Ivy Bridge without a BIOS update (unless the BIOS is up to date from the factory). It also lacks USB 3.0 and SATA 6gb/s. Get B75 or H77.
but how, there's no stock of fx 6300 on the stores here, so its just i3-3220 or fx-6100 or a10-5800k, thinking that there is no fx 6300 in the world yet
A non-K i5 is still faster than the FX-6100 at any speed. If we're talking about options he can drop in a $240 Xeon E3-1230 which is quad core and hyper-threaded.Because i5 costs way more than 6100 and he has no money for that? And with non-K i5 he is again stuck at stock clock with no perf. upgrade options...
A non-K i5 is still faster than the FX-6100 at any speed.