Dayman1225
Golden Member
- Aug 14, 2017
- 1,153
- 982
- 146
Icelake is the core change.
But we didn't?No offence , but we thought same for coffee.
I see desktop version coffee will be here until 2019.
So 9000 is coffee.
9000 is not coffee.No offence , but we thought same for coffee.
I see desktop version coffee will be here until 2019.
So 9000 is coffee.
It very well might be one.9000 is not coffee.
Cascade Lake-X is only Q4 2018?
Notice the lack of 8 core Coffee Lake on that road map and that this rumor thread is 8/16 9th gen? Yeah I don't think it's coffee at all. Cascade Lake X is lameo. Should be the same 18c on x299, 14nm++ refresh.It very well might be one.
Cascade Lake-X is only Q4 2018?
God forbid if AMD actually refreshes TR.
Gotcha.Notice the lack of 8 core Coffee Lake on that road map and that this rumor thread is 8/16 9th gen? Yeah I don't think it's coffee at all. Cascade Lake X is lameo. Should be the same 18c on x299, 14nm++ refresh.
Unless Intel is hiding cards I don't see 8/16 until 9000 series. Which isn't exactly great for Intel.Gotcha.
Though this sounds pretty bad, should AMD go for clocks with client-only PR die.
Intel needs the performance crown.
Well, probably. More cores == less margins, and any less margins and BK will face the day of the rope from the shareholders.Unless Intel is hiding cards I don't see 8/16 until 9000 series.
CFL-S launch did nothing to 1600/1600x sales.Which isn't exactly great for Intel.
I wish Intel would do something like this with their product stack.
Of course the big question is if these 8/16 desktop parts are going to be 14++ or 10nm? Maybe for economic reasons they're waiting to get them on 10nm? If they can just get those electrons to behave!
The chart doesn't say that, though.Wow, 8700k all through 2018? Intel is making a mistaaaake.
Wow, 8700k all through 2018? Intel is making a mistaaaake.
It is entirely possible Intel is hiding SKUs from this public roadmap. Though i'm not entirely sure how likely that is.
I wish Intel would do something like this with their product stack.
i7 - 8/16
i5 - 6/12
i3 - 4/8
Pentium - 2/4
Celeron - 2/2
And of course varying levels of cache, GPU, memory speeds, ...
It would make sense I think but from a marketing perspective 9 is bigger than 7 so the 8 cores will probably be i9.
Of course the big question is if these 8/16 desktop parts are going to be 14++ or 10nm? Maybe for economic reasons they're waiting to get them on 10nm? If they can just get those electrons to behave!
I'm not buying all that ram.I would rather their stack look like:
i9 - 10+/20+
i7 - 8/16
i5 - 6/12
i3 - 4/8
Pentium (core and atom) 4/4
Celeron (core and atom) 2/4
For the sake of progress, we need the bottom end part to have at least 4 threads so that the industry can standardize on the basic platform paradigm of 4 available threads. Also, for the sake of sanity, the i7/i9 in this sack would be triple/quad channel to keep all those threads fed with bandwidth. It would make sense for Intel for the split to be there as their 6 core and below products are a different die from their 8+ core products.
It is entirely possible Intel is hiding SKUs from this public roadmap. Though i'm not entirely sure how likely that is.
This isn't a public roadmap
Think of the 8 core as a pressure valve. If enough pressure from AMD or 9000 series too late, release pressure valve. Schedule is dependent on outside factors hence should not be advertised from the start. Makes sense?If no 8 core in 2018, Intel better hope Zen+ really sucks.