IE8 vs. FF 3.05 (on W7 64 bit)

[Muadib]

Originally posted by: hooterville
Just reinstalled IE8 and it's still a broken POS

I agree. IE8 wouldn't work right with the cookie for here. I kept having to log in, even after I deleted the cookie for here & got another.

I'm back to Vista now.

 

[bigsnyder]

Don't forget IE8 is beta. Some problems are to be expected.

 

[hooterville]

Originally posted by: bigsnyder
Don't forget IE8 is beta. Some problems are to be expected.

When will it ever make it out of beta?

Are there problems with IE8 in Windows 7 ?

 

[zenguy]

You should give FF 3.1 Beta 2 a Spin.

The new default JavaScript processor rocks.
It just blows IE7 and FF3 away.

I use some WebBased applications that are java heavy and the difference is incredible.

 

[hooterville]

Originally posted by: zenguy
You should give FF 3.1 Beta 2 a Spin.

The new default JavaScript processor rocks.
It just blows IE7 and FF3 away.

I use some WebBased applications that are java heavy and the difference is incredible.

Can you run 3.1 beta separate from Firefox 3.0 or does it over write 3.0?

 

[Lmnopc]

noscript and flashblock alone are reasons I stick to FF.

 

[KeypoX]

Originally posted by: Aflac
I dunno about you, but my firefox search results load basically instantly (less than 1s). I have it opening in a new tab, too, which probably contributes some to that load time.

yeah mine too... prob 300ms or so

 

[BlueAcolyte]

IE8 worked like crap on my Vista... It kept asking me for the same settings every time I used it and with pages with flash the CPU utilization would jump to 50%.

Back to Opera for me.

 

[zenguy]

i think you can specify a different location if you want.

 

[wiin]

Only retards use spellckeck.

 

[Deadtrees]

Originally posted by: wiin
Only retards use spellckeck.

Why aren't you using one?