"I absolutely agree 100%. But, like I said before, no one believes in something they don't want to believe in."
Lebe must have said this every 3 posts this thread and no one actually answered him. I figured I would clue him in as to the fact that no one answered him because no one could possibly disagree with this statement. The only thing I can say to make you think is that we don't always know what we want or why we do things. Some people believe because it is the only way they have ever known, some people do it for acceptance. But yes, in the end they must want to believe, or at least want that acceptance that comes from belief. See, the want is always there, just like someone has to want to move, want to run, and want to type. But the reason for the want can change. If you believe because you wanted acceptance and the local religion changes then your beliefs will change so that you may continue being accepted. Make sense?
I ask this question, if God gave us free will to somehow benefit us, then can he take it away? Can I request to be a perfect human and will my request be granted? If so, God, I hereby request to be a perfect human being. Speaking of perfect human beings, how can anyone claim that Jesus was perfect. If he was perfect he would never have died, he would have been superhuman. The term perfect means perfect in every way, not just mentally but physically as well. It would seem, based on the bible, Jesus made many choices in his life also. Choices != perfect.
You end up in a religion based on your society. Since all religions are written and governed by man, none of them can be perfect or even remotely right (Using the logic they provide, that God is a superbeing / perfect). Since, no single religion is right, it doesn't matter whether you pick one, the other, or none at all. Since it doesn't matter what you pick, what will this argument change.