You can't reason with the unreasonable and nobody wants to speak of personal responsibility in this matter. These very same people would be raising holy hell if they got hit by someone with no car insurance while out driving around town.Where does any of what you quoted mention poor people as a single reason for my stand. I think that you are missing what I'm typing, poor people who continue to do things to limit the possibility to get out of where they are. You guys continue to ignore that huge part of the argument and attempt to change what I'm typing. WHEN do you say enough is enough? Is a person having kids for the sole purpose of staying on welfare OK with you?
I didn't say poor people were the only reason for your stand. I said you are worried about what benefits poor people get. I said there are more important things to worry about and that is still my answer. It's certainly not important enough to restrict reproduction rights or implement policy that will create more hungry children than we already have.Where does any of what you quoted mention poor people as a single reason for my stand. I think that you are missing what I'm typing, poor people who continue to do things to limit the possibility to get out of where they are. You guys continue to ignore that huge part of the argument and attempt to change what I'm typing. WHEN do you say enough is enough? Is a person having kids for the sole purpose of staying on welfare OK with you?
Where does any of what you quoted mention poor people as a single reason for my stand. I think that you are missing what I'm typing, poor people who continue to do things to limit the possibility to get out of where they are. You guys continue to ignore that huge part of the argument and attempt to change what I'm typing. WHEN do you say enough is enough? Is a person having kids for the sole purpose of staying on welfare OK with you?
So your not gonna answer? Is a person having kids for the sole purpose of staying on welfare OK with you?I didn't say poor people were the only reason for your stand. I said you are worried about what benefits poor people get. I said there are more important things to worry about and that is still my answer. It's certainly not important enough to restrict reproduction rights or implement policy that will create more hungry children than we already have.
If you actually read the posts you would see where I get my info from. Care to go back and actually read before opening mouth?People are having kids for the sole purpose of staying on welfare?!!!
Shit! You better call up trump and have his voter fraud commission jump on this immediately! I'm sure what you are talking about is happening at such an alarming rate, just like voter fraud!
I'd ask for a citation but you and I both know that would be a complete waste of time because you and I both know that you haven't once bothered researching anything before you started posting. Its just a habit stupid people fall into.
If that is how they want to spend their life, go for it. Way more important things to worry about.So your not gonna answer? Is a person having kids for the sole purpose of staying on welfare OK with you?
You can't reason with the unreasonable and nobody wants to speak of personal responsibility in this matter. These very same people would be raising holy hell if they got hit by someone with no car insurance while out driving around town.
At least your honest.If that is how they want to spend their life, go for it. Way more important things to worry about.
If you actually read the posts you would see where I get my info from. Care to go back and actually read before opening mouth?
So 5 years of living it is not enough for you, got it.Hmmm...I read your posts again and I still didn't find any citations or facts to back up your claims. Maybe we are having a communication issue; do you know what a fact and a citation is?
If you put certain mouthpieces on ignore you won't have to worry about what they say.So 5 years of living it is not enough for you, got it.
If you put certain mouthpieces on ignore you won't have to worry about what they say.
So 5 years of living it is not enough for you, got it.
That isn't it at all. If a person has fallen upon demonstrably hard times shouldn't they also bear some part in mitigating their own circumstances?
Anecdotal evidence shouldn’t be enough for anyone. Your experience is representative of one thing. Your experience. Much like your individual experiences since then would not be representative of anything either.So 5 years of living it is not enough for you, got it.
for women, there's a birth control shot that lasts at least a month.
let's say there's a birth control shot for men that make them sterile for a month at a time?
would making those on public assistance (welfare/food stamps/section 8 housing/etc) receive these shots greatly reduce the next generation of poor?
less poor = better for society overall?
ie: less resources to prop them up and less crime
This is the sort of thing China (used to) like. Ask them how the "1 kid" policy worked.
As others have said, we really want the government engaged in population control? Is overpopulation even a problem in this country?
One thing is correct, as wealth continues to concentrate at the top something will have to give. I guess this would be one way that the ultra-rich could keep the hordes away from their gates (for a while). Gee, sounds like a great country to live in. More like the world of Elysium or any number of other future dystopias from stories.
Negative. No one should be forced to take pills or injections just because they're poor.
Looking at human beings fundamentally as liabilities is very dangerous.
This issue astonishes me each time that it comes up for discussion.Good luck talking to liberals who think breeding and having others support them is a good idea.
David Koch: Hey soulcougher! Look over there! That poor person is wasting your tax money!You seem to be missing the actual argument being made. No one is talking about 1 kid policies or permanently sterilizing people. The topic is should people on government welfare type programs be allowed to continue breeding or should they be on some form of TEMPORARY birth control until they can support themselves and kids.
Liberals seem to think its fine to let them keep breeding and someone else will pay of it no matter what. I think its fine you need temporary help from a social program, but not letting you dig our hole deeper by allowing you to add to the problem already at hand.