**IF** the Taliban really leave Kandahar, should kill 'em while their leaving?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Hoeboy

Banned
Apr 20, 2000
3,517
0
0
you guys do realize some of the talibans are afghan's forced into working for mohommad omar right? although they totally f*cked us on sept 11th, it doesn't mean we should start spraying our guns. and don't give me that "don't be a wuss" crap. if you're patriotic about the cause then don't be a hypocrite about throwing away what this country stands for while trying to justify it by patriotic reasons.
 

jjones

Lifer
Oct 9, 2001
15,425
2
0


<< you guys do realize some of the talibans are afghan's forced into working for mohommad omar right? although they totally f*cked us on sept 11th, it doesn't mean we should start spraying our guns. and don't give me that "don't be a wuss" crap. if you're patriotic about the cause then don't be a hypocrite about throwing away what this country stands for while trying to justify it by patriotic reasons. >>


i think you have the wrong idea. we're not going to kill them for surrendering but they do have to surrender. if they are retreating, they are not surrendering and then they should be pursued and killed until they do surrender. if their leadership will not allow them to surrender they should either mutiny, find a way to surrender on their own, or suffer the consequences of being in the losing army.
 

BCYL

Diamond Member
Jun 7, 2000
7,803
0
71
I say bomb them...

they will be much harder to find once they reached the mountains... bomb them while they are in plain sight...
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
halik,

We have 2 options here.

1. Get as many of them as we can while they retreat(retreat is not surrender).

2. Let them flee to the mountains to fight the guerrilla war they have promised. This will only drag out the suffering on all sides. This will slow down humanitarian efforts. This will slow down the rebuilding of afganistan. This will slow down the peace effort. War is war, are there are few rules.

The sooner this is over, the sooner we can get things back to normal.
 

Rudee

Lifer
Apr 23, 2000
11,218
2
76
What puzzles me about the whole conflict is how they let the enemy soldiers switch sides. This whole switching sides stuff is bull$hit. Either kill them or take them prisoner. Giving them the opportunity to switch sides lets this terrible people off too easy. As far as the retreating troops - Kill them too! Don't give them the opportunity to regroup and rain terror on a later day.
 

Helpless

Banned
Jul 26, 2000
2,285
0
0
As far as the retreating troops - Kill them too! Don't give them the opportunity to regroup and rain terror on a later day.

No! This is wrong! Halik and his books on morals say it's wrong, so it must be wrong.
 

XMan

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
12,513
49
91
whats that anti-personnel bomb that explodes before it hits the ground, and lights the air on fire?

BLU-82, Pave Pat Blue, "daisy cutter".
 

compuwiz1

Admin Emeritus Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
27,113
925
126
Waste em. If we don't they will just regroup and continue. When I was in the marines, we had orders on the rifle range, that if we spotted any illegal aliens coming across the range, we were to shoot them on site.
 

Cyberian

Diamond Member
Jun 17, 2000
9,999
1
0


<< But you don't know if they are surrendering...IF they want to surrender why not walk up to the NA and discuss terms for a surrender.

They are falling back to regroup.....dig-in.....and conduct guerilla warfare from the mountains. Unless they start waving the white flag they can and will be considered the enemy.
>>


Sorry, maybe I phrased my post wrong.
What I meant was that unless/until they surrender they should be considered as combatants and treated accordingly.
I agree with you - drop your effin gun and we will not blow your head off.
 

Michael

Elite member
Nov 19, 1999
5,435
234
106
If they're retreating, they should be attacked while they are retreating. If they surrender their weapons and are simply heading home, they should be tracked but not attacked. Each one should be searched as they leave and leaders should be arrested. It makes no sense to let them out of an area where they're bottled up so they can disperse and continue to attack for months to come.

Michael
 

Cyberian

Diamond Member
Jun 17, 2000
9,999
1
0


<< About the wtc thing, i havent seen a single body on tv thats from afghanistan. Im sure they have killed lotta people, but they wont show it to keep the pro-america rage going. Who knows maybe it all looks just like wtc. Anyway, id make em surrender and if they dont its their choice. Shooting someone in the back isnt cool >>


Halik -
How many bodies of any nationality have you seen? - That's right, there aren't any!
Afghanistan is not exactly at the forefront of International Trade, nor does it have a large number US immigrants, so there were probably fewer Afghanis in the WTC than people of, say Japan.
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
0
How about this - why dont we let the alliance people handle it. As soon as they have the goverment under the control, let them fight their war.
 

OrByte

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
9,302
144
106
I think it is safe to say the the alliance is too hung up on tribes/ethnic bigotry to effectively run that country.

Remember the NA is only a shade or two better than the Taliban in terms of their love for America and Western civilization as a whole. Don't go thinking they are angels of the desert!.

 

Pocatello

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 1999
9,754
2
76
You know what the NA will do with Taliban who are arabs and Pakistani? It's not pretty.
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
0
no i was talking about the bombing of afghanistan. We've never seen any damaga and what exactly is going on down there. Like in wtc they showed people jumping and waving from the building. And all the pople hurt on the street. Recently i saw some general talking about the bomb that explodees in the air andburns all the pople on the gournd. If they show pictures of what that does, maybe people would change their minds on how they support the war campain. Fox new is the wortst by far. I dont know whether you noticed or not but thir news are very inobjective. One time they were shooting ww2 footage to spur patrotism.


oh yeah about the alliance thing. I know a kid thats from pakistan and he says the alliance is no better that the taliban. Supposedly theyre just "bunch of radical thugs".
 

Ulfwald

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
May 27, 2000
8,646
0
76
Halik, are really as stupid as you appear to be? This is not a war per say, this is a manhunt for leaders of a terrorist organization, the NA is just reaping the side benefits of our work.
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
0
you know manhunt or large scale can also be called a genocide. I still think we should put them all in front of international court instead of shooting them.

Oh yeah, im not sure how much surrendering is gonna happen. The taliban soldiers that had been on disc channel seemed pretty brainswashed.


Better yet: if they run, leave em. if they run AND shoot, they chose their fate
 

Pocatello

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 1999
9,754
2
76
They start the war, we will finish it. Those bombs did what exactly what we want them to do, to kill as many of them as possible. Most Americans want the military to do more, not less. Bin Laden didn't give those WTC victims a chance, should we give him and his allies a chance to run away so they can terrorize and kill innocent civilians like those of the WTC again?
 

Squisher

Lifer
Aug 17, 2000
21,207
66
91
If they lay down their arms and put their hands in the air then and only then will they be allowed to take the targets off their backs.
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
0
that a good point. One thing that still bothers - when they planned the attack, they sure must have realized that theres gonna be counterinitiative. And form the severity of the wtc attack, its hard to believe that they couldnt fortell that us will destroy their little club. The qquestion is why did they do it. One thing i can think of their whole goal was to get us to fight on the same level as they do. Answer violence with violence, and use brute force instead of common sense. We might be very close to accoplishing that goal. If we actually capture and then execute the leaders of taliban without real investgation, we will finish the terrorist attack
 

Tripleshot

Elite Member
Jan 29, 2000
7,218
1
0
Time to clean out Pakistan"s rabel rousers too. Close the borders with US and UN troops. Those inside that start trouble.---Off them. Those fleeing Afghanistan to Pakistan----grill em, then kill em. Anyone 6'5" tall trying to cross the border, feed him a ham sandwich then blow the top of his skull off.:disgust:
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |