Really ?
1. extremely high inventory of valuable assets.
That has since been marked down significantly, if you are referring to real estate.
Generally speaking though, the assets possessed is not inventory, it is working capital. Residual value of most government property is significantly less than the purchase price. These assets are not sold for profit. A measure to use would be return on assets. How much in tax dollars are collected each year compared to the total value of all government held assets?
Which hasn't exceeded expenses for the majority of the last century. Even during the Clinton "surplus" years, the surplus was never realized, it was on paper.
Got that right.
Very arguable.
If you saw a business with $130 billion worth of long-term debt, with income of $15 billion and expenses of $30 billion annually, and the board of directors kept insisting that revenues will double in a few years when the economy improves, would you call that sound?
The only difficulty is matching the income and outflow better. We could raise some taxes without hurting anything, it just isn't popular.
And would contribute an insignificant amount compared to the overall budget.
We could cut spending but again, it isn't really popular.
It's popular with a lot of people. I'd say more popular than raising taxes.
So it's pretty easy to solve, we the people have to get realistic about taxes and spending and stop being taken in by political lies like we don't have to pay for the government we want.
That's how it's been for decades. The government will give you what you want, will solve your problems, and will take care of you for your life, and you won't have to pay for it... somebody else will.
Same thing with public unions. Keep raising their salaries, because you won't have to deal with the problems, the next guy will.