Trump beat ISIS?
lolololololol
I don't think you understand the ramifications of what you are seeking. Congress should be able to call for investigations but it is up to the DOJ to decide to prosecute. I mean, since when is it the responsibility of the executive or legislative branches to render punishment?
"Beating" ISIS? Ok...all we do (fully by design) is to keep creating new enemies with new names and labels. Then we start "fighting" those new enemies. The racket of the military industrial complex goes on and on - which the entire political class is fully in bed with. As I keep saying, in all the ways that are substantial, there is no difference between D and R. The usual stuff in the news is mostly smokes and mirrors. The "circus" part of Rome
Even in foreign policy where the two parties are much closer than on other topics this is silly. As an example ask yourself if the US would have invaded Iraq if Al Gore had been president. Of course not.
Ok, there would have been one less invasion - maybe.
Interesting, I wonder if the tens of millions of people who were newly insured under the ACA think there’s no difference between the two parties.
I guess those 23 indictments don't count. Mueller knows more then anyone so crimes committed is unknown.
Benghazi 4 year investigation. Email investigation 2 years. Zero indictments.
They had to get people on process crimes. Nothing related to collusion.
On the other hand Hillary and Bill are as dirty as the day is long, collecting billions in pay for play from those seeking influence in Washington, Obama and the Secretary of State.
Billions of dollars from Russians, Arabs, Americans, etc. Yet did she or anyone else get charged? Fuck no. Its Hillary. And Democrats always "get away with it."
Such bullchit.
They had to get people on process crimes. Nothing related to collusion.
On the other hand Hillary and Bill are as dirty as the day is long, collecting billions in pay for play from those seeking influence in Washington, Obama and the Secretary of State.
Billions of dollars from Russians, Arabs, Americans, etc. Yet did she or anyone else get charged? Fuck no. Its Hillary. And Democrats always "get away with it."
Such bullchit.
They had to get people on process crimes. Nothing related to collusion.
On the other hand Hillary and Bill are as dirty as the day is long, collecting billions in pay for play from those seeking influence in Washington, Obama and the Secretary of State.
Billions of dollars from Russians, Arabs, Americans, etc. Yet did she or anyone else get charged? Fuck no. Its Hillary. And Democrats always "get away with it."
Such bullchit.
The Clinton Foundation was a charitable organization that spent over 90% on charity.
https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=16680
Meaning none was used for personal gain. Moreover, no quid pro quo was ever discovered.
Even more moreover, they pledged to stop taking foreign and corporate donations when Hillary Clinton became president to avoid any appearance of impropriety. That pledge led to a sharp decrease in donations. They literally tanked it to prevent any appearance of influence or impropriety.
You really need to step outside your echo chamber. The Clinton Foundation conspiracy theory never went anywhere legally because there never was anything even remotely illegal or unethical there.
People inside the right-wing conspiracy cult echo chamber remind me of an idiot banging their head on a wall and saying, "Maybe this time, maybe this time, maybe this time" over and over and over again ad infinitum. An intelligent person would start to pick up on the fact that they are bullshitting you.
He doesn't even know Taj Majal was built by a Muslim king for his concubine and you expect him to know recent stuff?
Politicians don't prosecute. The Justice system does that.
This thread is a very good example of how the right-wing has completely undermined the actual rule of law and believe it works like a banana republic dictatorship. Why? Because the conspiracy theories they've been spoon fed by their propaganda media about people they are ideologically opposed to never resulting in any actual criminal charges has led them to believe there is no justice.
When in reality, those conspiracy theories don't hold up to rational, legal scrutiny. They don't even pass the sniff test if you want to know how gullible and stupid you really are.
This is what happens when you mainstream and legitimize batshit for political gain.
There is plenty of proof of Hillary colluding with Russians to gain control of American uranium, military secrets and all other sorts of crimes.
Look it up. Then lock her up.
There is plenty of proof of Hillary colluding with Russians to gain control of American uranium, military secrets and all other sorts of crimes.
Look it up. Then lock her up.
The uranium thing is really weird. There were a number of officials who had to sign off on the non-scandal of the ages. Hey, pay her a trillion dollars and Hillary still couldn't have done anything, although there's no wrong involved at all.Lol...
The uranium thing is really weird. There were a number of officials who had to sign off on the non-scandal of the ages. Hey, pay her a trillion dollars and Hillary still couldn't have done anything, although there's no wrong involved at all.
There is plenty of proof of Hillary colluding with Russians to gain control of American uranium, military secrets and all other sorts of crimes.
Look it up. Then lock her up.
Interesting, I wonder if the tens of millions of people who were newly insured under the ACA think there’s no difference between the two parties. Anyone who says the two parties are the same is utterly clueless; it’s a thing ignorant people say to sound informed. In the past that was closer to the truth but since the mid 1970’s our right wing party has gone progressively more insane.
Even in foreign policy where the two parties are much closer than on other topics this is silly. As an example ask yourself if the US would have invaded Iraq if Al Gore had been president. Of course not.
He doesn't even know Taj Majal was built by a Muslim king for his concubine and you expect him to know recent stuff?
concubine was the term used on one of the documentaries I watched. :shrug:It was in the memory of his favorite wife, not a concubine. So yeah, you don't seem to know a lot either.
You misunderstand.
The DOJ is investigating and would be the prosecution. Assuming the Dems gain enough seats then the impeachment and removal of Trump would be possible.
But what I'm talking about is after Trump and whoever else is out.
The Dem leadership should say something to the effect of "Dear America, we who represent you entirely support the investigation into matters which have been deeply troubling. If the DOJ determines that grounds for prosecution exist we will support them in their efforts up to and including the maximum penalty as they and the judiciary deem warranted."
I'm going to bet we don't hear anything like that even though the public needs to know that there will be no partisan attempts to sabotage or minimize efforts, quite the reverse. Yeah, Republicans, but I'm talking Dems.
Then why did nothing happen? Why was she not locked up? Republicans have had the power in the government other than the presidency for years, why didn't they lock her up? Is it just one big liberal conspiracy?There is plenty of proof of Hillary colluding with Russians to gain control of American uranium, military secrets and all other sorts of crimes.
Look it up. Then lock her up.