darkxshade
Lifer
- Mar 31, 2001
- 13,749
- 6
- 81
If I were just a bit taller, #2 starting pitcher for a perennial contender in MLB. I would have a bionic arm that's indestructible. 15 game winner w/ high 200 ERA. I would play for 1 team for my entire career...
Cricket. I don't even know how to play but it doesn't look that physical, so I would be able to enjoy my money down the road.
Why #2? The title says elite, that could conceivably be top 5 league wide. Which could get you 20M/year.
Well Messi and Ronaldo sell shirts and fill up staduims world wide. No 2 and 3 only does it in the USA. Theres a bigger market to exploit. Theres a difference than justify their worth and overpaying for a ego because those type of players in any sport normally puts your team morale into the ground. Fans want to see their team win trophies not Big names winning jack.
I woulld choose Football or F1
Those guys make most of their money from sponsorships, not from their salary. Basketball has a huge following abroad in major markets, especially in Asia. LeBron and Kobe make more than Messi because of sponsorships, not just from raw salary.
Great, but not what this thread is about.
Which would you pick? How you get paid is not part of this.
Beach volleyball. I already play highly competitive indoor. And who needs to make a bazillion dollars when you can party with vball people.
Basketball.
Massive salaries with the least amount of physical work/damage to ones body.
Excellent answer.Golf...longevity and no sh!tty teammates to deal with.
If he has played, it definitely was not with anyone big or good, judging by that answer.Least amount of physical work? lol
Have you even ever played basketball?
Golf...longevity and no sh!tty teammates to deal with.
Yeah, but then you're playing golf. Not only is it not a sport, but you're playing on top of a superfund site every time you do it.
Least amount of physical work? lol
Have you even ever played basketball?