NikPreviousAcct
No Lifer
- Aug 15, 2000
- 52,763
- 1
- 0
It wouldn't be a set age, per-say. It would be when they prove to me that they're mature enough to handle it.
Originally posted by: FFMCobalt
It wouldn't be a set age, per-say. It would be when they prove to me that they're mature enough to handle it.
Since when did dating involve being a slut?Originally posted by: Karsten
WOW... a lot of you parents think it reasonable that your 15 or 16 year old Girl gets in a physical relationship?!
Once my daughters are 18 they can do whatever they want, but until then I make the decision if I put them in a dangerous situation or not! Honestly I am shocked how many people seem to think that they meet all the need when they meet the physical aspect "I put them on the pill", but nowhere near seem to care for the emotional need. And don't give me that argument that you do... you stated that you don't when you made your post!
:disgust:
Because learning to deal with others in social situations and learning to deal with relationships with the opposite sex beyond saying "hi" in the school hallways is WRONG.Originally posted by: zmatrix
I'd say 16. They shouldnt be dating too early anyways - relationships will just screw em up.
Originally posted by: emu10k2
They should be able to date as long as their combined age is not less than 26.
Originally posted by: imtim83
For me 17 or 18 i think.