If you had to...

[s2000]

If you had to choose between this or this which one would you choose?Please state your reasons shortly. Also I am not 100% sure but does the BFG have VIVO?

 

[McArra]

9700Pro without doubt. It will outperform Fx5900 by a significant margin with AA/AF enabled and it has much better DX9 performance.

 

[cm123]

FX5900 hands down is my choice, this one has VIVO, one of the best fx5900 if not the best...

http://www.newegg.com/app/viewProductDesc.asp?DEPA=&sumit=Go&description=14%2D122%2D175&searchdepa=0

Manufacture link:

http://www.leadtek.com/3d_graphic/winfast_a350_tdh_myvivo_1.html

 

[Keysplayr]

Definately the 5900 out of these two.

 

[Schadenfroh]

Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Definately the 5900 out of these two.

 

[Schadenfroh]

Originally posted by: cm123
FX5900 hands down is my choice, this one has VIVO, one of the best fx5900 if not the best...

http://www.newegg.com/app/viewProductDesc.asp?DEPA=&sumit=Go&description=14%2D122%2D175&searchdepa=0

Manufacture link:

http://www.leadtek.com/3d_graphic/winfast_a350_tdh_myvivo_1.html

i do believe that is the 2nd ugliest video card i have ever seen but........

does it have the 2.2ns ram?

 

[cm123]

Originally posted by: Schadenfroh

Originally posted by: cm123
FX5900 hands down is my choice, this one has VIVO, one of the best fx5900 if not the best...

http://www.newegg.com/app/viewProductDesc.asp?DEPA=&sumit=Go&description=14%2D122%2D175&searchdepa=0

Manufacture link:

http://www.leadtek.com/3d_graphic/winfast_a350_tdh_myvivo_1.html

i do believe that is the 2nd ugliest video card i have ever seen but........

does it have the 2.2ns ram?

Yes

http://www.overclockers.co.nz/ocnz/review.php?id=03vga00gffx5900leadtek0gffx59000205

 

[lifeguard1999]

It depends. What you are going to use the card for?

Gaming only? 9700 Pro
Gaming with VIVO? 5900
Linux? 5900

It would help if you gave a bit more information.

 

[cm123]

Originally posted by: cm123

Originally posted by: Schadenfroh

Originally posted by: cm123
FX5900 hands down is my choice, this one has VIVO, one of the best fx5900 if not the best...

http://www.newegg.com/app/viewProductDesc.asp?DEPA=&sumit=Go&description=14%2D122%2D175&searchdepa=0

Manufacture link:

http://www.leadtek.com/3d_graphic/winfast_a350_tdh_myvivo_1.html

i do believe that is the 2nd ugliest video card i have ever seen but........

does it have the 2.2ns ram?

Yes

http://www.overclockers.co.nz/ocnz/review.php?id=03vga00gffx5900leadtek0gffx59000205

Here is a better picture & another review

http://www.bjorn3d.com/_preview.php?articleID=322

here they talk about 2d being better than others with this card...

http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/leadtek_winfast_a350_ultra_tdh_review/default.asp

some more front & back pics here...

http://www.gamechronicles.com/gear/pc/winfasta350/myvivo.htm

 

[NittanyLAncer]

I agree with lifeguard that I'd change my decision depending upon the use of the card. For Linux, price, if you need VIVO or you plan on displaying your desktop in 2048X153 I'd go 5900. But to be quite honest I made the same decision and decided to get the ATI version of the 9700Pro off of ZipZoomFly (price drop to $209 this weekend, only $5 more than a powercolor card and will give you better support and higher re-sale value) . It IS faster and I'm not all that convinced of nVidia's dX9 performance as of yet, and since I mostly play games on my home machine I FINALLY bought a non-nVidia card (excluding 3dfx, for they will always be dear to my heart).

 

[VIAN]

9700 Pro is faster.