You're the one saying she's a terrible person, and yet you can't provide a quick summary yourself.
How fitting of your intellect and personal integrity.
#Trump/LeMay 2016
You're the one saying she's a terrible person, and yet you can't provide a quick summary yourself.Can someone please post a quick summary of how fucked up Hillary Clinton is?
-John
And then you quote the Daily Kos....oh the ironing!
You're the one saying she's a terrible person, and yet you can't provide a quick summary yourself.
How fitting of your intellect and personal integrity.
#Trump/LeMay 2016
Somehow, highly classified information from SIPRNet, as well as even the super-secure JWICS, jumped from those closed systems to the open system and turned up in at least 1,340 of Clintons home emails including several the CIA earlier this month flagged as containing ultra-secret Sensitive Compartmented Information and Special Access Programs, a subset of SCI.
He says its clear from some of the classified emails made public that someone on Clintons staff essentially cut and pasted content from classified cables into the messages sent to her. The classified markings are gone, but the content is classified at the highest levels and so sensitive in nature that it would have been obvious to Clinton. Most likely the information was, in turn, emailed to her via NIPRNet.
Source
And yet more information coming out concerning this "nothing" event. This pile only gets deeper but have no doubt the true believers will be along to tell you this all amounts to "nothing" as well.
In one email, Clinton pressured Sullivan to declassify cabled remarks by a foreign leader.
“Just email it,” Clinton snapped, to which Sullivan replied: “Trust me, I share your exasperation. But until ops converts it to the unclassified email system, there is no physical way for me to email it.”
In another recently released email, Clinton instructed Sullivan to convert a classified document into an unclassified email attachment by scanning it into an unsecured computer and sending it to her without any classified markings. “Turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure,” she ordered.
Someone familiar with military computer systems help me out here. How the heck were classified emails making it off of SIPR\JWICS\NSANET and onto the regular old internet so they could be sent to her email server?
Someone familiar with military computer systems help me out here. How the heck were classified emails making it off of SIPR\JWICS\NSANET and onto the regular old internet so they could be sent to her email server?
D: damn... she and her incompetent staff needs to be locked up.
In another recently released email, Clinton instructed Sullivan to convert a classified document into an unclassified email attachment by scanning it into an unsecured computer and sending it to her without any classified markings. “Turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure,” she ordered.
In international relations, an aide-mémoire is a proposed agreement or negotiating text circulated informally among delegations for discussion without committing the originating delegation's country to the contents. It has no identified source, title, or attribution and no standing in the relationship involved.
Print it out on a piece of paper, scan it into another computer, and voila, now you can email it outside secured systems.
Someone familiar with military computer systems help me out here. How the heck were classified emails making it off of SIPR\JWICS\NSANET and onto the regular old internet so they could be sent to her email server?
They weren't. Based on what's currently known, she didn't get any material that was classified at the time. It was marked classified only after being reviewed for release to the various congressional committees.
It's not that hard. You just wait until the New York Times or the Irish Times write stories mentioning the material, then have someone send you a link. Volia! Based on the examples in today's creative writing exercise, that's exactly what happened (and both examples are very old news). There was an NYT story mentioning drone strikes, and an IT story describing the situation in Libya.Someone familiar with military computer systems help me out here. How the heck were classified emails making it off of SIPR\JWICS\NSANET and onto the regular old internet so they could be sent to her email server?
For those who'd like the quick rebuttal of this propaganda piece:Source
And yet more information coming out concerning this "nothing" event. This pile only gets deeper but have no doubt the true believers will be along to tell you this all amounts to "nothing" as well.
For the record, I recognize it is possible this former WorldNut Daily writer and a Judicial Watch propagandist have somehow, in fact, found the smoking gun to nail Clinton once and for all. Hope springs eternal for the Clinton haters. Of course it's also possible -- and just about as likely -- that I'm going to win this week's PowerBall. I'll wait for the FBI to give us real information instead of desperately swilling every RNC attack piece I can find. YMMV.NY Post Pushes Dubious Claim That Clinton Aides Improperly Circumvented Email Classification System
Writer Has A Long History Of Islamophobia, While Only Named Source Has Done Work For Anti-Clinton Group
The New York Post published a discredited conservative writer's thinly-sourced report that former State Department aides to Hillary Clinton illegally "cut and pasted" classified materials and sent them to Clinton's personal email. The report seems to be based solely on the claims of a former State Department official who has worked with the anti-Clinton organization Judicial Watch. ...
Originally Posted by Fern View Post
We're speaking of federal govt for one thing, not the State of Florida. (I don't know and couldn't care less what Jeb did, that's up to the people of FL.)
For another your link doesn't have anything about Jeb setting up a private server.
WTF are you talking about? Do you even know?
Fern
Uh oh it looks like you've ventured into dumb fuck mode.
From the article you clearly didn't read.
As governor, Bush used his account, jeb@jeb.org, to conduct official, political and personal business, including plans to woo new businesses to the state, judicial appointments and military matters, the e-mail records show. His e-mail server was housed at the governors office in Tallahassee during his two terms; he took it with him when he left office in 2007.
Second, your question didn't say you are only asking about federal employees. So excuse me if I didn't read your mind.
Lastly, what Clinton is being accused of would not change had she used a private email she setup or one by a private company like Gmail, of which the prior two SoS used.
This has been explained, both in the media and here. Bill Clinton had the server set up for his email when he left the White House. Hillary Clinton chose to use it as well. Simple and convenient.[ ... ]
Additionally, she has so far failed to explain why she went to the unique/unusual extent to setup a private server instead of just Gmail etc for her personal emails. It seems that motive is in question as the investigation has been reported to extend to improper dealings between herself as SOS and the Clinton Foundation (influence peddling). For some reason she felt this extreme measure of control (private server fully under her control) was necessary. Why?
Fern
she has so far failed to explain why she went to the unique/unusual extent to setup a private server instead of just Gmail etc for her personal emails.
This has been explained, both in the media and here. Bill Clinton had the server set up for his email when he left the White House. Hillary Clinton chose to use it as well. Simple and convenient.
The FBI is ready to indict Hillary Clinton and if its recommendation isn't followed by the U.S. attorney general, the agency's investigators plan to blow the whistle and go public with their findings, former U.S. House Majority leader Tom DeLay tells Newsmax TV.
Tom DeLay's sources at FBI says they're ready to indict. She could be guilty of all of it, but Loretta Lynch doesn't have to do it.
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/tom-delay-hillary-clinton-indict-fbi/2016/01/25/id/710813/
I made a simple statement of fact, rebutting Fern's claim that this hasn't been explained. It has. It's unfortunate you can't keep up with such a straightforward, two-comment exchange.You understand the difference between a former president and a sitting secretay of state right?
I don't think your explanation gets to the heart of the question.I made a simple statement of fact, rebutting Fern's claim that this hasn't been explained. It has. It's unfortunate you can't keep up with such a straightforward, two-comment exchange.
The question was irreparably flawed because its premise was false. Hillary Clinton used the email server they already had. It in no way was going to a "unique/unusual extent"or "an extreme measure of control." It was there and it was convenient. That's the plain answer, regardless of others' insinuation and speculation.I don't think your explanation gets to the heart of the question.
Tom Delay would be an expert on getting indicted, of course, haha.
I bet a disgraced former congressman who has been out of office for a decade has great sources inside the FBI that he has coincidentally decided to share with an ultra right media outlet. You guys will really swallow anything.