IG: Some Emails on Clinton's Server Were Beyond Top Secret

[Hugo Drax]

This does not seem to be in the news. no mention on cnn,abc,cbs,msnbc.

 

[JSt0rm]

This does not seem to be in the news. no mention on cnn,abc,cbs,msnbc.

then it must be real.

 

[Jhhnn]

This does not seem to be in the news. no mention on cnn,abc,cbs,msnbc.

Molly Ivins put it well- "All hat, no cattle."

It's the same as every "scandal" Repubs have trumped up since Whitewater.

 

[Zorkorist]

It's hugely important, and goes to her integrity, honesty, and ability to lead a nation.

-John

 

[ivwshane]

It's hugely important, and goes to her integrity, honesty, and ability to lead a nation.

-John

Should you be judged on false claims by others? And by false I mean claims that never pan out.

If so, I think I'll have to air the things I've heard about you and the atrocities you've committed.

Show me how you aren't a hypocrite.

 

[Zorkorist]

Dude, I'm not running for office.

She, is a piece of shit.

-John

 

[Zorkorist]

Can someone please post a quick summary of how fucked up Hillary Clinton is?

-John

 

[ivwshane]

Dude, I'm not running for office.

She, is a piece of shit.

-John

I don't see how that makes a difference other than the smearing of a political figure is more common.

 

[Vic]

Dude, I'm not running for office.

She, is a piece of shit.

-John

But you're gonna vote for the guy who gets in petty twitter flame wars, right? Insulting other people for how they look when he has the most ridiculous toupee ever?
You.. are not smart.

 

[Zorkorist]

Anybody other than Hillary, or Socialist Bernie, etc.

Won't vote for a Bush... done and over with them.

So, yes, Donald Trump.

Works for me.

-John

 

[mysticjbyrd]

Can someone please post a quick summary of how fucked up Hillary Clinton is?

-John

In the recent debate she was asked about the influence wall street had on her, and she started rambling off 9-11 rhetoric. The only relevant factor being the state of origin.

Eventually, she was called out on it, by twitter, because apparently the moderator is incompetent. Her rebuttal was to continue to ramble off some bullshit about 9-11.

I think that sums it up nicely.

Somehow the morons in attendance ate that freshly secreted bullshit right up, and cheered.

 

[Vic]

Anybody other than Hillary, or Socialist Bernie, etc.

Won't vote for a Bush... done and over with them.

So, yes, Donald Trump.

Works for me.

-John

So, in your never-ending quest for small government, you want to put a nasty-tempered small-minded narcissistic egomaniac with a populist agenda in charge of the government.
Like I said, you are not smart.

 

[Zorkorist]

Don't even start to say the Donald is going to strip us and make us suck his dick.

hILLARY WILL.

-John

 

[Vic]

Don't even start to say the Donald is going to strip us and make us suck his dick.

hILLARY WILL.

-John

Only in your disturbed mind.

 

[Zorkorist]

This is a thread about how fucked up Hillary Clinton is.

The answer is very.

You should just go off and fuck yourself.

-John

 

[Jhhnn]

In the recent debate she was asked about the influence wall street had on her, and she started rambling off 9-11 rhetoric. The only relevant factor being the state of origin.

Eventually, she was called out on it, by twitter, because apparently the moderator is incompetent. Her rebuttal was to continue to ramble off some bullshit about 9-11.

I think that sums it up nicely.

Somehow the morons in attendance ate that freshly secreted bullshit right up, and cheered.

Anybody who thinks that Wall St welcomes this message is out of their Hillary-hating minds-

https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/wall-street/

 

[Zorkorist]

Hillary would be the worst thing that could happen to America.

-John

 

[mysticjbyrd]

Anybody who thinks that Wall St welcomes this message is out of their Hillary-hating minds-

https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/wall-street/

It's called a fucking lie, genius!

Hillary's campaign in the primary is to copy Bernie Sanders, and rely on her name recognition to win.

 

[Zorkorist]

Hillary and Bernie are both cries from the liberal establishment of America, that want to continue fucking everyday Americans.

They will tax and spend us to death.

No freedom.

-John

 

[Jhhnn]

It's called a fucking lie, genius!

Hillary's campaign in the primary is to copy Bernie Sanders, and rely on her name recognition to win.

That's right- anything contrary to what you believe must be a lie if your worldview is threatened by it. You think like a right winger. It's a different version of Truthiness.

Or just a new version of an old trick-

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/...in-and-it-s-not-because-they-like-his-message

 

[Zorkorist]

DailyKos is as liberal, communist, socialist as it gets.

Probably don't want to pay heed to them.

-John

 

[Doc Savage Fan]

That's right- anything contrary to what you believe must be a lie if your worldview is threatened by it. You think like a right winger. It's a different version of Truthiness.

Or just a new version of an old trick-

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/...in-and-it-s-not-because-they-like-his-message

And then you quote the Daily Kos....oh the ironing!

 

[pcgeek11]

Double post.

 

[pcgeek11]

So, uhh, you're claiming that Clinton and her aides didn't have the security clearance to talk about leaked information among themselves?

The best part for the nit picking ravers is that the conversation is... Classified! so we'll never know what was said. Perfect conspiracy theory material.

That isn't what I was saying, but probably most of them did not with the SAP information as it isn't just the clearance level it is "The Need To Know" requirements. But that I couldn't say exactly and neither could anyone else.

What I am saying is that they violated security when the information was placed on a non-secured server and then gave the server administration up to a private company that doesn't have a security or need to know clearance.

It doesn't matter if the information was leaked or not. It is still classified and the documentation is not to be distributed outside of secure methods.

I remember back in the cold war days when The Readers Digest printed a huge article about the US Navy SSBN Weapons Systems and missiles. Loads of it was accurate and leaked information. But we were not allowed to discuss or distribute the information out of secure methods. Neither confirm nor deny is the rule of the day.

 

[nickqt]

Come on in! The water's fine!

I have very few people on ignore, but he's one of them...welcome to the club.

It's always funny watching conservatives congratulate one another on epistemic closure.

Congrats!