ch33zw1z
Lifer
- Nov 4, 2004
- 37,995
- 18,344
- 146
Or seemingly use it yourself. (The Onion.)
Newsflash, that is an article from The Onion.
Haha, makes me cry, cuz they got me.
Or seemingly use it yourself. (The Onion.)
Newsflash, that is an article from The Onion.
Duh! That is why it is so offensive.It's funny how nobody seems to actually know where that phrase came from.
Hint, the face of what person is printed on American $100 bills.
Duh! That is why it is so offensive.
You left out the link you sneaky devil.
It's funny how nobody seems to actually know where that phrase came from.
Hint, the face of what person is printed on American $100 bills.
https://www.theonion.com/report-al-qaeda-allegedly-engaging-in-telemarketing-1819566582
The line itself is from the movie Dead Presidents
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0112819/
Or seemingly use it yourself. (The Onion.)
Newsflash, that is an article from The Onion.
Being deliberately obtuse now, huh? Obviously you can understand why it is offensive.Yes. I'm sure that his descendants are thoroughly offended by the phrase.
Well, there are 3 options:
Well, there are 3 options:
or
- You dont read the news and dont know the context of her remarks.
- You are too stupid to figure it out
3. Like I said you are being deliberately obtuse.
Take your pick. Or actually it could be a combination of two or even all 3.
Well, there are 3 options:
or
- You dont read the news and dont know the context of her remarks.
- You are too stupid to figure it out
3. Like I said you are being deliberately obtuse.
Take your pick. Or actually it could be a combination of two or even all 3.
The phrase is NOT offensive in any way,,,unless your poor and have no Bemjamins Baby!!Well, there are 3 options:
or
- You dont read the news and dont know the context of her remarks.
- You are too stupid to figure it out
3. Like I said you are being deliberately obtuse.
Take your pick. Or actually it could be a combination of two or even all 3.
Are you having fun yet?
I'd like to hear your reason(s) why you believe that phrase is offensive.
Is that t shirt offensive to you?
And yes, I do know the context of her remarks wherein she was accusing various American politicians of being for sale to lobbying groups because various American politicians are apparently for sale (and pretty cheap it often seems). But that has nothing to do with the phrase itself does it.
Or, perhaps you don't actually think that the phrase itself is offensive but who used it and how you perceive that she used it.
Again, feel free to enlighten me.
Jews controlling the government, the media, financial markets, etc. with their money. Check.
Jews and their useful idiot companions, who are mostly under thrall of the aforementioned Jewish money, having divided loyalties. Check.
Yea, saying "it is all about the Benjamins" is really an appropriate way to say it, huh?
I'm out of the loop here. Since when was the phrase "All about the Benjamins" offensive. I mean it wasnt a great film and the song is a bit shit but offensive?
It's always just meant "all about the money" hasn't it?
I'm afraid she wasn't just accusing "various politicians of being for sale to lobbying groups," as if she were merely making a generic remark about problems with lobbyists. So no, you don't really get the context at all, or you're pretending not to. I've explained it many times before. Example:
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/?id=Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps&exid=thread...-to-primary-ilhan-omar.2562634/#post-39768923
Jews controlling the government, the media, financial markets, etc. with their money. Check. Jews and their useful idiot companions, who are mostly under thrall of the aforementioned Jewish money, having divided loyalties. Check. Prior to 1948, the loyalty went to a shadowy international Jewish conspiracy. After 1948, it became the State of Israel. The Nazis accused Jews of having divided loyalties and of corrupting German gentiles with their money. These anti-semitic tropes go back literally over 1,000 years in Europe.
I'm sure your next comment will be something like, "b-but, she didn't say Jews!" I find it funny how liberals are so interested in everyone understanding the history of things like blackface, and giving great deference to African-Americans when they complain of racist tropes being used, if only out of ignorance in some cases. But when it comes to anti-Semitism, the left's got nothing. Apparently, it's only possible to "dog whistle" certain types of bigotry but not others. I find that very convenient.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/how-rep-...-capital-of-the-us-officials-highly-concerned
https://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/201...ted-to-be-terrorist-recruitment-capital-of-us
https://pjmedia.com/trending/illhan-omar-declines-to-address-terrorist-recruitment-in-her-district/
https://www.dailywire.com/news/4357...t-terrorist-recruitment-capital-ryan-saavedra
We need to do more to stomp out domestic terror, regardless of which group wants to spread terror, regardless of ideology. Looks like we have found a good place to start. Go figure, this anti-American congress woman's district is a hotbed of terror recruitment. So far there are rumors with supporting evidence that she married her brother, she was seeing someone outside her marriage (which I don't even care, that'd be her business, but for someone to do that and then preach to me how I need to be a better American is laughable), and her district sprouts wannabe terrorists. I'm sure she'll just blame racism and call it a day.
He is the Minister of Truth , injustice and the Trump way!!!Day late and a dollar short again Mr. Ministry of Truth?