Supposing for a moment that the writer of the article had determined by valid statistical means that black women were found to be substantially less attractive when viewed by a wide group of people.
Would there be any way he could present that data without being crucified?
BTW, while I don't really have an opinion one way or another with black women, I find half black, half white women to be VERY attractive.
If the article is fact-based, what's wrong with it? Try taking the Harvard Skin-Tone Implicit Association Test and see what your own preferences are. Hell, I'm not white myself and even I prefer lighter shades.
Now I'm wasting time taking those tests.. interesting.
You have completed the Light Skin - Dark Skin IAT.
Your Result
Your data suggest little to no automatic preference between Light Skin and Dark Skin.
The couple I got "wrong" seemed to be just my anticipating the next question; not sure about the test.
I also did the one for blacks and whites...and I'm a moderate racist.Your ResultYour data suggest a moderate association of European American with American and Asian American with Foreign compared to Asian American with American and European American with Foreign.
Weee, doing more tests. I'm also sexist.Your ResultYour data suggest a moderate automatic preference for European American compared to African American.
Your ResultYour data suggest a moderate association of Male with Science and Female with Liberal Arts compared to Female with Science and Male with Liberal Arts.
If the article is fact-based, what's wrong with it? Try taking the Harvard Skin-Tone Implicit Association Test and see what your own preferences are. Hell, I'm not white myself and even I prefer lighter shades.
Supposing for a moment that the writer of the article had determined by valid statistical means that black women were found to be substantially less attractive when viewed by a wide group of people.
Would there be any way he could present that data without being crucified?
I'm not confident that you understand the word 'ignorance'. This is a scientific study. It is NOT the opinion of the author. You can mock the data all you want- and perhaps the voters were biased- but it's not up to the analyst how experimental data trends.
For example, because they have existed much longer in human evolutionary history, Africans have more mutations in their genomes than other races. And the mutation loads significantly decrease physical attractiveness (because physical attractiveness is a measure of genetic and developmental health).
As a black man I must say that I agree. I never go out with black women never, for various reasons.
They did not factor in the wear of school girl outfits with extremely small skirts. Perhaps they should have placed the black women in such attire and then did the study.
Earlier this month, the popular magazine Psychology Today published an article by evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa titled
BTW, while I don't really have an opinion one way or another with black women, I find half black, half white women to be VERY attractive.
Psychology is bullshit anyway.
Read the rest of the article:
A half black/white person is going to be lighter skinned, obviously not dark but not light so you don't like dark skinned. Almond skin color is considered the most attractive right now.