Ichinisan
Lifer
- Oct 9, 2002
- 28,298
- 1,234
- 136
Compression also refers to the method of flattening soundwaves during mastering so the music sounds louder.
Ah. Gotcha.
Compression also refers to the method of flattening soundwaves during mastering so the music sounds louder.
I think it also depends on the artist. I recently bought the latest Tom Petty and Eric Clapton albums. The mix is not a problem.Modern music is brickwalled. That's the problem. Listen to an old CD from back before the loudness wars. You can actually hear individual instruments and there is actually a soundstage.
I have allman brothers CDs that are recorded amazingly well.
I actually bought a CD recently and it must be compressed more than normal because I don't remember CDs sounding this bad.
ever since toms hardware did that comparison of a high end 2k dac an x hundred dollar sound card and a 2 dollar realtek chip and not one person could hear the difference, i've come to the understanding that audiophiles are full of crap and have too much bloody money.
link in case you haven't read it.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/high-end-pc-audio,3733.html
Trolling? Or uncompressed CD audio came from a compressed source?
Isn't it true that for the longest time now, all audio CDs/albums you get are mastered in such a way as to max out the volume of everything? As in there is no tonal range and variance or whatnot. It's just loud and unsophisticated and downright horrid.
That might be the difference you're detecting.
Isn't it true that for the longest time now, all audio CDs/albums you get are mastered in such a way as to max out the volume of everything? As in there is no tonal range and variance or whatnot. It's just loud and unsophisticated and downright horrid.
That might be the difference you're detecting.
Of course it is...... ANALOG IS BETTER!!!!!!!Rakehellion said:I just put on an old Stevie Wonder album and the sound quality was way, waaaay better than compressed audio.
"sounds like shit" does not automatically mean it is "compressed"How the fuck do I know? I bought it on Amazon.com... and it sounds like shit. I'm not fucking trolling.
If you take the exact same file, make a copy/conversion to 256kbps MP3 (assuming its not an encoder that specifically does things to enhance certain parts of the audio spectrum) and compare it to the lossless (or even uncompressed) original, most people wouldn't be able to discern the difference, even with high quality speakers. Even fewer people would be able to correctly discern which one was the "higher quality" one with any consistency.
So some people can't tell the difference. That isn't really relevant to the people who can.
I would like to see a double blind experiment that showed this. Everything I've ever seen has shown that audiophiles are full of shit.
Let me guess, OP liked vinyl before it was popular. Enjoy a PBR while listening to those old Neil Diamond records...