If more Pakistani Muslims were like this chap. I would fully support them for getting Indian citizenships:
https://www.hindustantimes.com/ente...ever-take-it-for-granted-101628970546263.html
I am going to ignore your whataboutism since we are talking about the CAA.The CAA does not discriminate against Muslims. The CAA only fasttracks persecuted minority groups for citizenship. If tomorrow, Myanmar is bought under the preview of the CAA, then Rohingyas will be fasttracked for citizenship under CAA too.
Nothing prevents the Muslims of Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan from applying for citizenship the normal way.
So for the last time, No, the CAA is not discriminatory. Other laws exist with the very same intention of the CAA like the American Lautenberg Amendment. The CAA provides a home to desperate people fleeing horrendous persecution. That's all. Nothing in it prohibits Muslims from seeking Indian citizenship in any form or manner.
If this answer still does not satisfy you, blow it out of your hole.
How about acceptance and tolerance for others regardless of religion or ethnic background? What have you in common with his teachings?And mind if I ask you which of his teachings you exactly followed?
The cry that democracy is in danger in India were always bullshit.Well it does suggest that at least the electoral system is intact, it's not like he is winning with 109% of the vote like Putin.
So I should treat terrorists who want to bleed my country as equally as this man who genuinely loves my nation. Thats another instance of the nonsensical arguments as proposed by the likes of you and the likes of fskimospy here. You people need a dose of reality here.You understand you're exercising discrimination with your stance here, correct?
So I should treat terrorists who want to bleed my country as equally as this man who genuinely loves my nation. Thats another instance of the nonsensical arguments as proposed by the likes of you and the likes of fskimospy here. You people need a dose of reality here.
Thats the level of nonsense liberals and leftists are known for.You can try to deny it, but it’s still discrimination. As we discussed, USA is no exception when it comes to exercising discrimination, just seems some of us are more honest about and willing to change it, while the “likes of you” seem quite accepting of it.
Nationalism versus patriotism. Nationalist embrace bad policy because it hurts the “right” people, patriots want to change bad policy and dont blame others for the bad policy.
Thanks for the thread bump and back to your flailing.
Clearly this means India should pass laws that discriminate against people based on their religion.
Thats the level of nonsense liberals and leftists are known for.
It means India should be very careful about the kind of people it can naturalize as citizens,Clearly this means India should pass laws that discriminate against people based on their religion.
/s
That goes for anyone. India has implemented a law though that explicitly discriminates against one religion. This is a fact and not really debatable.It means India should be very careful about the kind of people it can naturalize as citizens,
What facts? Your nonsensical argument that India naturalize the citizenship of tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of potential terrorists?Yawn, sorry if facts hurts your feels. If you’re into nationalism, then stop pretending you’re not /shrug
Religious bigot says what?What facts? Your nonsensical argument that India naturalize the citizenship of tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of potential terrorists?
He loves votes. Nothing more.So I should treat terrorists who want to bleed my country as equally as this man who genuinely loves my nation.
Another nonsensical argument perpetuated for naturalizing the citizenships of thousands or of potential terrorists from Pakistan! You are in good company here.That goes for anyone. India has implemented a law though that explicitly discriminates against one religion. This is a fact and not really debatable.
So yes the Indian government is practicing religious discrimination.
Shouldn't there be a terrorist event on a daily basis if there are so many terrorists there?What facts? Your nonsensical argument that India naturalize the citizenship of tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of potential terrorists?
The facts that have been discussed in this thread. The thread is almost 300 posts long, maybe review it.What facts? Your nonsensical argument that India naturalize the citizenship of tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of potential terrorists?
Yea but stereotypes are a real time saverShouldn't there be a terrorist event on a daily basis if there are so many terrorists there?