Originally posted by: AnitaPeterson
You know... I see a double-standard at play here.
The VT killer was BORN in South Korea, but he came to the U.S. at the age of 8.
At the time of the killings, he'd spent TWO THIRDS of his life in the U.S.
That makes him an American, regardless of his birthplace. He was also a U.S. citizen, and South Korea, if I remember correctly, does not allow dual citizenship. (Take other examples, in order to understand this issue: Edward Teller, the father of the neutron bomb, is considered an American, although he was born in Hungary; Isaac Asimov was born in Russia... Was Al Capone an "Italian" gangster?)
My point is this: regardless of his physical features, he was, from a psychological standpoint, formed and influenced by the North American cultural environment. Ergo, there's no difference between him and, say, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold.
I suspect that the media, authorities and general U.S. population prefer to label the killer as "Korean" because they don't want to think of him as "yet another disturbed American kid", therefore inviting self-criticism, analysis and contemplation. Sadly, it also makes the matters easier to brush off.