Starbuck1975
Lifer
- Jan 6, 2005
- 14,698
- 1,909
- 126
I've never said she is worst than Trump. I have said she was probably the most vulnerable candidate to face him.LOL, worse than Trump? There's absolutely no way you believe that.
I've never said she is worst than Trump. I have said she was probably the most vulnerable candidate to face him.LOL, worse than Trump? There's absolutely no way you believe that.
Fair enoughYour quote didn't appear to be a quote (usually people use quotation marks) and if it had not been, it would have been quite sexist and ageist. In the future, indicate that you are quoting somebody using normal english punctuation and I will refrain from confusing a quote with a statement made by you.
And in a sane America that shouldn't have even been a remote possibility. I am far from her biggest cheerleader but her "deplorable" remark was spot on. I thought it when she said it and not one Trumpublican has managed to changed my mind since.I've never said she is worst than Trump. I have said she was probably the most vulnerable candidate to face him.
How about I revise my recommendation to perhaps just allowing her to run for senate or house again?
I can see why having her run as Prez is probably a bad idea... there is too much bad blood. She would make a great senator tho, I still think that's true.
Bull fucking shit. She was my senator and she was a terrible senator. Could never get an answer or call back from her. Whenever I've called her replacement Kirsten Gillibrand they always replied.
Is it that one wanted to be seen as presidential and the other is just doing the job they're supposed to do?
She couldn't even become governor of Arkansas.. and that's where she's from.
Did you just say she was a bad senator because she didn't return your call? Lol self centered much?
No, she's not. She's from Illinois.
Did you just say she was a bad senator because she didn't return your call? Lol self centered much?
Yeah, fuck the people right? Its not like she should care about the people, that would stop her from helping those people.
Yeah! Because if she isn't helping me then clearly she isn't helping people!!!
/s
Nope, you are trying to shift what was said. Every person who reaches out should get some sort of a response. This does not mean action and help should always happen, but a response should. That is clearly the point and any shift will be seen as stupid.
Lol, that sounds feasible and reasonable.
Yes it is feasible and reasonable. The entire population is not trying to contact their senators. Further, you are suggesting there not be a direct link from the people to the senators that represent them which is absurd. The very foundation of our country is built upon representation. I am not saying that the senator even needs to be the one to reply, but someone from the office absolutely should. You may have accepted the disconnect, but that is a very bad policy to promote.
Thanks for the straw man, it will go nicely with the goal post you moved earlier.
Careful, if you ever hold up that mirror you might see yourself.
Guy says Hillary never replied, but the replaced does. Square that circle. How was Hillary unable, but the replacement able? Is her office Hogwarts powered?
Yes I am self centered when it comes to my safety and well being.
Hildabeast was just looking to score political points what looks good on camera. Gillibrand on the other hand, her staff will return a call within a week and investigate if you have a problem.
Yeah I can't imagine a world in which one senator was able to reply and another wasn't, its not like you cannot take anecdotal evidence and extrapolate it to make a blanket statement. I'm sure senators also receive the same amount of calls so such comparisons are pretty easy to make, there can't possibly be other factors that would cause one senator to respond and another not to. I mean even the events and issues at the time were similar and its not like one was facing a major historical event and the other wasn't.
/s
How are you so fucking stupid sometimes?
To be fair, Hillary's staff were busy running charities. If you paid 6 figures they would have returned your call.
Oh, sick burn there.
Yes, Hillary was around during a hyper political time and we are far calmer now. People are just so much more level headed and there is just far less for a senator to do now. With all that free time, senators are able to reply to questions now. Just an amazingly calm time we live in politically. Sorry I was so dumb to have missed that.
Lol! You still don't get it and I doubt you ever will. Your types like to remain ignorant of history unless its politically expedient.
Its a wonder she got as far as she did in her political career imo.