- Mar 14, 2008
- 127
- 0
- 0
Recently, I've been noticing that my aging E2160 is requiring more vcore to keep it stable at 3GHz (just recently bumped it again to 1.45V last week). As I have noticed my electricity bill gradually climbing the last couple of months, this brought up the question as to whether my overclocked system is using significantly more power than a non-overclocked one.
Specifically, if I replace the 65nm E2160 @3GHz (overclocked) with something like a 45nm E6500 @ 2.93GHz (stock), would this typically lower my electricity bill by a noticeable amount, or not make much of a difference? I'm thinking going from 65nm to 45nm and from overclocked to stock might save some power for sure, but not certain by how much.
Specifically, if I replace the 65nm E2160 @3GHz (overclocked) with something like a 45nm E6500 @ 2.93GHz (stock), would this typically lower my electricity bill by a noticeable amount, or not make much of a difference? I'm thinking going from 65nm to 45nm and from overclocked to stock might save some power for sure, but not certain by how much.