- Sep 5, 2003
- 19,458
- 765
- 126
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dL7l9pW78Kg
Example:
GTA 5
i5-6500K@4.6
R9 390x@1140/6200
With Overlay vs. Without
0:11-0:12 mark (+9% to +11%)
44 fps vs. 48 fps
45 fps vs. 50 fps
45 fps vs. 49 fps
46 fps vs. 50 fps
0:24 mark (+14 to +16%)
44 fps vs. 51 fps
43 fps vs. 50 fps
42 fps vs. 48 fps
Since most review sites do not show or explain how they test games, this is a very important point. Some of these differences are huge, amounting to moving up a full tier in GPU price bracket such as from a $280 R9 390 to a $380 R9 390X (or competing brand's product).
We cannot assume that all GPUs will react so negatively to the MSI AB overlay, so it seems best to test all games without it for accurate bench-marking.
Example:
GTA 5
i5-6500K@4.6
R9 390x@1140/6200
With Overlay vs. Without
0:11-0:12 mark (+9% to +11%)
44 fps vs. 48 fps
45 fps vs. 50 fps
45 fps vs. 49 fps
46 fps vs. 50 fps
0:24 mark (+14 to +16%)
44 fps vs. 51 fps
43 fps vs. 50 fps
42 fps vs. 48 fps
Since most review sites do not show or explain how they test games, this is a very important point. Some of these differences are huge, amounting to moving up a full tier in GPU price bracket such as from a $280 R9 390 to a $380 R9 390X (or competing brand's product).
We cannot assume that all GPUs will react so negatively to the MSI AB overlay, so it seems best to test all games without it for accurate bench-marking.
Last edited: