You may have mentioned this before but how old is your Q-niece and what level of education did she reach?
PS.
Not that it's worth mentioning, but the Q's are at it again.
Straight from the mouth of my Q-niece, claiming this assault was again faked and staged, just as the Q's claim Sandy Hook was faked and staged.
The reasoning????
NO AMBULANCES WERE ON SCENE.
Where were the ambulances?
How could kids be shot if there were no ambulances called to respond?
Yes folks, THIS is the Q's response once again. Within their smutty perverted little Q-world, nothing is true. Nothing, except Donald Trump.
Everything else is faked and staged by the goberment.
In this latest case, staged because gun laws were being voted on in congress AND it is an election year.
Q's actually believe that the government, OUR GOVERNMENT, would kill children because of an election.
(no reply necessary)
You are stuck in the reactionary way of thinking.. The government being there, citizens being armed won't prevent anything, as it is all reactionary, meaning they will be reacting after the fact. The only way this will stop is if we start being proactive, not reactive. Democrats are trying to be proactive, but people don't understand it as they are stuck in one way thinking, just as you are.
In risk mitigation, you can change the frequency with which something happens or the severity of the consequence when it happens.
Right now we're doing neither. And we know exactly what we need to do to limit the severity of someone going off kilter in a very significant way - remove guns from the equation.
Add to that lowering the gun buying age from 21 to 18 and the killer, you guessed it just turned 18.Seems one thing that can be done is for the parents of the victims to file a class action suit against the state and personally against Gov. Abbot for not providing adequate security at the state's schools.
As an aside, sad to say it crossed my mind that a wholly different scenario would have occurred as far as how Abbot and his cronies tightly controlled the narrative coming out of this tragedy if a mass murder of pre-teen kids occurred at an exclusive religiously affiliated private school located in a posh neighborhood.
Indeed. Which is why relying on others to step up in such a situation is a gamble and really doesn’t fix the issue.
You are wrong about #1. Dems only have control of 2 branches. 50 DOES NOT give one control of the Senate just a plurality.Right. They control all three branches and couldn't even get a climate bill passed under Obama or Biden.
They still got outplayed in redistricting this cycle after 10 years notice from the last time.
What mythical party is coming to do this? Lol no.
Revoking Texas law allowing gun purchases at 18 from the original 21 would have stopped this one. At least delayed it.What law do you think Democrats are going to pass that will actually stop motivated criminals?
You may have mentioned this before but how old is your Q-niece and what level of education did she reach?
Take the Aurora theater shooting. Let say 1/3 are packing. Lanza starts shooting and 30 more people start shooting back. When police show up how do they ID the good guys with guns? Think less people would have died in that scenario?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And here I thought I just happened to have cried myself to sleep finding out it became a word long before you did. But I am still sick about it. Somebody tore a hole in one of life's greatest pleasures, being a smug Grammar Nazi. Fortunately I was somewhat prepared for the blow because I have to live with the shame of not knowing how to spell.fuck
you are literally, the worst.
the worst
We are all guilty of murdering those kids so we have to do something................................to deflect.There is no proactive, only performative.
What law do you think Democrats are going to pass that will actually stop motivated criminals?
NYs SAFE act completely failed in Buffalo.
Cops stood outside Columbine, guard ran away at Stoneman Douglas, and looks like waited a while before coming in here.
Not to mention the day to day criminals carjacking, burglarizing and assaulting people.
People are left to fight only with their fists until the govt maybe, finally shows up.
Oh wow, I didn't even know this was actually true when I wrote the above. For fuck's sake man!So much for "All it takes to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun".
Doesn't help if the good guy with a gun does fuck all. It's easy as fuck to say "Oh yeah, I would totally have stopped the active shooter if I were there on the scene", but actually doing it when duty calls is another thing entirely. Some say that the solution is to simply hire armed guards or to provide teachers with guns, but who the hell will take up that responsibility if you're not psychologically prepared to put your life on the line? Teachers don't want the burden of knowing they'll be responsible for defending kids if an active shooter shows up. That's simply not part of the job description. Similarly, if you're hired as a school security guard, you better be ready to put your life on the line and you best believe there's a good chance it will happen in your lifetime. I mean, let's think about it: the active shooter typically has nothing to lose! If it's your job to go up against someone who is already willing to die, good luck to ya because you're already at a disadvantage right there. I'd like to think that I would have the courage to go into an active shooter zone and be able to do something helpful if given the chance, but truth be told the only real motivator that counts is desperation and I sure as hell won't be feeling desperate unless it was one of my kids in there or I was already in a classroom and my life was at immediate risk. Those cops who waited out front? Yeah, there was no desperation motivating them to do something because they simply had the option to hang outside nor would it be likely one of their kids was in there.
Where you are off is that they don't trust that the person will be there when they need them, and they would rather rely on themselves.
The grand bargain Democrats are always offering is that govt will be there to protect the law abiding citizen, so they don't need their own arms.
But as we just saw in Buffalo, the govt failed as they often do.
But but but MORE armed guards and teachers will definitely work!
Could instate remote only learning. Hard to shoot a school full of kids if they're all at home.Revoking Texas law allowing gun purchases at 18 from the original 21 would have stopped this one. At least delayed it.
Why not try proposing some of the Dem changes? We already know the result of doing nothing. We already know armed guards are not enough.
Fuck off. Obama compromised with the GOP on the ACA and then they all voted no on it. 2010 for fuck's sake and here we are in 20 fucking 22 and you say this shit with a straight face. Get informed. Pay fucking attention. Until Democrats get 67 Senators, America and Americans can all continue to eat shit and die.Then don't pretend to live in the land of the possible. The lack of compromise isn't exclusive to one side of this issue, ...
I don't know, how about you fucking tell us since you're the asshole that fucking decided to interject your fucking concern about fucking money into this?
Democrats can't pass ANY policy as long as 50 republicans in the Senate are voting no on every bill.Agreed. How?
Solutions have to be real, not airy fairy pipe dreams.
Ds aren't living in reality with a lot of their policy ideas. Never going to pass, never going to survive courts if it did.
I have been saying this for years. Owning a gun makes you LESS safe.
How to Persuade Americans to Give Up Their Guns
The way to reduce gun violence is by convincing ordinary, “responsible” handgun owners that their weapons make them, their families, and those around them less safe.www.theatlantic.com
Err...it's been proven over and over that less guns DOES make everyone safer. See basically every other nation on earth.Fuck off. I don’t owe you any explanation. You keep ranting and raving like a spoiled child that gun owners should just give up their guns but I am not going to just hand over fifty thousand dollars worth of guns because you think it will make everyone safer.
Yes, it does, but as an aggregate, the statistics don't lie.Depends on the person.
This is what everyone says, and they are wrong.Depends on the person.