1. It would reduce the principle of "guilty until proven innocent"; i know first hand that I am not allowed to say I want to commit suicide (at least not too much) and the psychiatrists like to try to read minds and then take aggressive action; but they generally have been unable to minimize risks. They really don't think very independently; who is to say that their learned knowledge is greater than the experience, the well-being and often the long term health of the patient? anti-psychotics increase body temp and cause pollution. some meds are consumption resulting in exhalation of metals and other toxins which get into the water supply or air (some of the stuff is excreted renally and fecally; i.e., they can contribute to heart disease for many of the ones around people on some meds).
2. About 13% of all young children (16 and younger IIRC) are already on psychotropic drugs. A lot of police paranoia and environmental hazards and public spending (which reduces private investment) is due to that.
3. some drugs cause mental instability as they cannot be very stable in the bloodstream unless on a very tight schedule which may conflict with other drugs (SRIs cause shock; I have experienced it); I believe Eric Harris would not have murdered anyone had he not ever been on Luvox and he had more pure consumptions. I believe my problems as well as those from John Hinckley Jr. were strongly contributed to by anti-depressant usage.
4. Reagan who cared about people who couldn't help themselves (he raised pay and hired more public staff that jimmy carter reduced) decreased funding on "mental health" for a reason. He absolutely decreased.
and as far as I know bill clinton didn't restore it (and never wanted to) which was good. In fact, the literature from his admin was the least pro-pharma and least pro-psychiatry. i don't know about hw bush. george w bush, if he increased it, may have done so as general spending increases and with new general red tape (the True Dick n' Bush Admin was very allied with intellectual monopoly from early on so the funding was not only increased directly, but also through at least one indirect method; Attorney General Ashcroft was a huge Congressional supporter of the pharmaceutical monopoly).
4. the pharmaceutical industry has so many assets through patents trademarks and copyrights that it has no natural business making wholesale deals with hospitals; hospitals already make more revenue from insurance and will make even more from the ACA so increasing mental health funding is a terrible idea.
5. while conditions in prisons for psychiatric patients are terrible, they won't be any happier with more funding.
6. the crisis intervention teams are really just regular cops who tazer people; the cops can't carry out the orders with precision just like I can't minimize risks; quite the contrary, thought disorder or excessive thought organization increases risk to society. at least 70% of all cops and federal bureaucrats are just as sociopathic as anyone really. they care about some, but their care is repressed deep inside them and it only comes out once they understand that someone suffers really, really badly. I admit I am a sociopath. Perhaps cops should be psychopaths instead; if they are to ensure equality of justice, then psychopaths who repress their thoughts may be better at protecting natural rights.
7. prisons themselves are old forceful order (they're really a failed experiment) and with more technology prisons and other forms of aggression (public and private) can be avoided and replaced with nothing. the extreme male brain is most likely to continue holding grudges; so a form of feminism is actually to let the State collapse.
8. it is fortunate that the GOP and Obama Admin have not come to a mutual agreement; fortunately, the President is much smarter than all law and order conservatives and about all psychiatrists or those who find people with "mental health" issues fascinating when they're really not that different. A lot of it could be due to executive statist globalism (foreign like weapons and bombs, conquest, and the U.S.G uniformly legislating and enforcing environmental standards) as well as patents, copyright, and trademark recycling old ideas which destroy independent investment in the original (I have doubts that the Gates Foundation can improve what already exists).
9. better, longer lasting, less expensive treatment for executive dysfunction (like poor dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) can be found by the market; with laissez-faire confederalism being the ultimate prevention of mental disorders. individualist and secessionist education for people with low or average fluid intelligence could increase fluid intelligence;
and individualist breast feeding is also a very good idea (if the rate went up 1/3, then fluid intelligence including working memory for attn to detail will go up); it reduces the severity of all possible health issues (it strengthens natural immunity so fewer toxins need to be consumed later on) yet only about 1/2 of all americans are not breast fed for any of the first 3 years by anyone (doesn't have to be the mother and some breasts may be better than others for fluid intelligence); perhaps WIC, the FDA, patents, copyrights, trademarks, the CDC, war on drugs, war on terror (PTSD), and other State intervention have increased mental health issues.
Obama has not enforced the Unaffordable Care Act as much as some wanted him to; he may sign its repeal hoping that the general welfare will be improved or that compulsiveness will go down (but everyone in the GOP would have to end their desire for reform in order to be happy; and they would have to continuously repeal more legislation without any replacement). And please always remember, it is merely the threat of legislation and any existing red tape that starts distorting the market. The 13 ratified Articles of Perpetual Union were actually like a chameleon (the epilogue was different from the rest and the supremacy and pro-debt articles were harsh as was all the roman-style "no/shall") and the nationalists' excuse for more control (hindsight isn't really 20/20). Thomas Jefferson's 16 proposals for Confederation were precise, less wordy, formal, and could've lasted (particularly due to the decentralized and equal tax power which meant land couldn't be as nationalized and that it would've been more clear that creditors would be paid back by the consent of the people and their legislatures).
2. About 13% of all young children (16 and younger IIRC) are already on psychotropic drugs. A lot of police paranoia and environmental hazards and public spending (which reduces private investment) is due to that.
3. some drugs cause mental instability as they cannot be very stable in the bloodstream unless on a very tight schedule which may conflict with other drugs (SRIs cause shock; I have experienced it); I believe Eric Harris would not have murdered anyone had he not ever been on Luvox and he had more pure consumptions. I believe my problems as well as those from John Hinckley Jr. were strongly contributed to by anti-depressant usage.
4. Reagan who cared about people who couldn't help themselves (he raised pay and hired more public staff that jimmy carter reduced) decreased funding on "mental health" for a reason. He absolutely decreased.
and as far as I know bill clinton didn't restore it (and never wanted to) which was good. In fact, the literature from his admin was the least pro-pharma and least pro-psychiatry. i don't know about hw bush. george w bush, if he increased it, may have done so as general spending increases and with new general red tape (the True Dick n' Bush Admin was very allied with intellectual monopoly from early on so the funding was not only increased directly, but also through at least one indirect method; Attorney General Ashcroft was a huge Congressional supporter of the pharmaceutical monopoly).
4. the pharmaceutical industry has so many assets through patents trademarks and copyrights that it has no natural business making wholesale deals with hospitals; hospitals already make more revenue from insurance and will make even more from the ACA so increasing mental health funding is a terrible idea.
5. while conditions in prisons for psychiatric patients are terrible, they won't be any happier with more funding.
6. the crisis intervention teams are really just regular cops who tazer people; the cops can't carry out the orders with precision just like I can't minimize risks; quite the contrary, thought disorder or excessive thought organization increases risk to society. at least 70% of all cops and federal bureaucrats are just as sociopathic as anyone really. they care about some, but their care is repressed deep inside them and it only comes out once they understand that someone suffers really, really badly. I admit I am a sociopath. Perhaps cops should be psychopaths instead; if they are to ensure equality of justice, then psychopaths who repress their thoughts may be better at protecting natural rights.
7. prisons themselves are old forceful order (they're really a failed experiment) and with more technology prisons and other forms of aggression (public and private) can be avoided and replaced with nothing. the extreme male brain is most likely to continue holding grudges; so a form of feminism is actually to let the State collapse.
8. it is fortunate that the GOP and Obama Admin have not come to a mutual agreement; fortunately, the President is much smarter than all law and order conservatives and about all psychiatrists or those who find people with "mental health" issues fascinating when they're really not that different. A lot of it could be due to executive statist globalism (foreign like weapons and bombs, conquest, and the U.S.G uniformly legislating and enforcing environmental standards) as well as patents, copyright, and trademark recycling old ideas which destroy independent investment in the original (I have doubts that the Gates Foundation can improve what already exists).
9. better, longer lasting, less expensive treatment for executive dysfunction (like poor dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) can be found by the market; with laissez-faire confederalism being the ultimate prevention of mental disorders. individualist and secessionist education for people with low or average fluid intelligence could increase fluid intelligence;
and individualist breast feeding is also a very good idea (if the rate went up 1/3, then fluid intelligence including working memory for attn to detail will go up); it reduces the severity of all possible health issues (it strengthens natural immunity so fewer toxins need to be consumed later on) yet only about 1/2 of all americans are not breast fed for any of the first 3 years by anyone (doesn't have to be the mother and some breasts may be better than others for fluid intelligence); perhaps WIC, the FDA, patents, copyrights, trademarks, the CDC, war on drugs, war on terror (PTSD), and other State intervention have increased mental health issues.
Obama has not enforced the Unaffordable Care Act as much as some wanted him to; he may sign its repeal hoping that the general welfare will be improved or that compulsiveness will go down (but everyone in the GOP would have to end their desire for reform in order to be happy; and they would have to continuously repeal more legislation without any replacement). And please always remember, it is merely the threat of legislation and any existing red tape that starts distorting the market. The 13 ratified Articles of Perpetual Union were actually like a chameleon (the epilogue was different from the rest and the supremacy and pro-debt articles were harsh as was all the roman-style "no/shall") and the nationalists' excuse for more control (hindsight isn't really 20/20). Thomas Jefferson's 16 proposals for Confederation were precise, less wordy, formal, and could've lasted (particularly due to the decentralized and equal tax power which meant land couldn't be as nationalized and that it would've been more clear that creditors would be paid back by the consent of the people and their legislatures).
Last edited: