Indiana's 'Religious Freedom Bill'

Page 12 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Jan 25, 2011
16,699
8,909
146
I'm sorry, but the notion of forcing Jewish bakers to bake goods featuring Nazi symbolisms, if such a customer comes into their business, is horrible. Business owners should have the freedom to express their conscience regarding how they do business, and with whom.

If I'm looking for a job, my business is open to the public. I'm seeking customers who will purchase goods I can provide: my labor. Do I now have to accept the first job offer that comes my way?

Notice in your example you have to add to it to make it a negative. Nazi symbols. You are confusing offensive message with regular item sold by the proprietor and you aren't the only one in this thread who has done so. Also, being a Nazi isn't a protected class. Gender is. In many states sexuality is.

If gays wanted a wedding cake of two guys butt fucking then absolutely it can be refused. If they just want a cake, like any other cake than no.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
36,735
28,908
136
The answer is no. People shouldn't be forced to participate in an exchange of goods, whatever their motivation.

People are not. Bakers choose to exchange goods in public so that means serve the public or stop altogether.
 

FerrelGeek

Diamond Member
Jan 22, 2009
4,669
266
126
This has already been addressed multiple times. Why do people jump into a thread without actually reading it?

Because I have a life and don't have time to read every bloody post. And my opinion is just a valid as yours.
 

JD50

Lifer
Sep 4, 2005
11,754
2,344
126
Because I have a life and don't have time to read every bloody post. And my opinion is just a valid as yours.

Your "opinion" has already been addressed, several people have explained why that's a bad idea and why it didn't work in the past.
 

FerrelGeek

Diamond Member
Jan 22, 2009
4,669
266
126
Serious question as I honestly don't know the answer to this. Has the owner of chic-fil-a gone on record as saying he doesn't like gays or is it merely that he doesn't approve to the practice of homosexuality? To the best of my knowledge he's not like those diseased freaks at westboro baptist.

There is a distinction that it seems fewer and fewer people grasp, that there is a difference (or there should be) between approving of someone's actions / lifestyle and accepting them. To this day, one of the greatest compliments ever given to me was by one of my college roommates, way too many years ago. He told me that he knew that he did things that I didn't approve of, but he knew without any doubt that I still accepted him and that meant a great deal to him. I've tried to live up to that compliment ever since.

If you goal is to improve this country, then you need to ask yourself why there are rules, and how they actually work out.

If your goal is to end discrimination, will telling people they cant for x reason but not y really do much?

Look at chick fil a. The head of the company does not like gay people. Do you think that the company sells to gay people because they have to, or because they want to make money?
 

JD50

Lifer
Sep 4, 2005
11,754
2,344
126
Serious question as I honestly don't know the answer to this. Has the owner of chic-fil-a gone on record as saying he doesn't like gays or is it merely that he doesn't approve to the practice of homosexuality? To the best of my knowledge he's not like those diseased freaks at westboro baptist.

There is a distinction that it seems fewer and fewer people grasp, that there is a difference (or there should be) between approving of someone's actions / lifestyle and accepting them. To this day, one of the greatest compliments ever given to me was by one of my college roommates, way too many years ago. He told me that he knew that he did things that I didn't approve of, but he knew without any doubt that I still accepted him and that meant a great deal to him. I've tried to live up to that compliment ever since.

That goes back to the idea that you choose your sexuality and who you are attracted to, I think most people have gotten past that.
 
Jan 25, 2011
16,699
8,909
146
And a business is happy over the new law and says they will not cater to gays and this law protects them...

RFRA: First Michiana business to publicly deny same-sex service
http://www.abc57.com/story/28681598/rfra-first-business-to-publicly-deny-same-sex-service

If you search their name in google it comes up with gaybearfinder.com as their website. That and yelp reviews are of course coming in full force.

Considering they are from a small town in rural Indiana that had exactly 1 Yelp review prior to today, I'm going to go out on a limb and say net effect = about 0
 

SMOGZINN

Lifer
Jun 17, 2005
14,221
4,452
136
Serious question as I honestly don't know the answer to this. Has the owner of chic-fil-a gone on record as saying he doesn't like gays or is it merely that he doesn't approve to the practice of homosexuality? To the best of my knowledge he's not like those diseased freaks at westboro baptist.

There is a distinction that it seems fewer and fewer people grasp, that there is a difference (or there should be) between approving of someone's actions / lifestyle and accepting them. To this day, one of the greatest compliments ever given to me was by one of my college roommates, way too many years ago. He told me that he knew that he did things that I didn't approve of, but he knew without any doubt that I still accepted him and that meant a great deal to him. I've tried to live up to that compliment ever since.

A person does not practice homosexuality. It is not a musical instrument. Do you practice hetrosexuality? Do you say you dislike people who practice red hair but not gingers?

One is or is not homosexual. Saying that one does not like homosexuality IS saying that someone does not like homosexuals.
 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,655
687
126
And a business is happy over the new law and says they will not cater to gays and this law protects them...

RFRA: First Michiana business to publicly deny same-sex service
http://www.abc57.com/story/28681598/rfra-first-business-to-publicly-deny-same-sex-service

If you search their name in google it comes up with gaybearfinder.com as their website. That and yelp reviews are of course coming in full force.

To counter that, the state senator who authored the bill is the owner of one of the largest ice machine distributors in Indiana and several companies have told him to come and get his machines. He will likely lose MILLIONS.
 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,655
687
126
Businesses in Indiana are placing signs in their front windows "We serve everyone" Like it.

Also heard interview with a woman who owns a pizza shop saying she would refuse selling pizzas to a gay couple for wedding. Took guts to answer.

A good follow-up question if a hetero couple wanted the same would she ask if they engaged in premarital sex? If they said yes would she refuse the sale?

Just thought of another one, what if a gay couple before wedding did not engage in premarital sex? Does she sell? See where I'm going.

I think you were the poster who asked this question before (maybe I'm mistaken), but I didn't see an answer. Can anyone who is religious please tell me where in the Bible (or Quran or any other religious text) it specifically says not to do business with homosexuals? I just don't understand the justification these folks are using to deny service but I admit I'm ignorant of many elements in the Bible since I'm an atheist.
 

realibrad

Lifer
Oct 18, 2013
12,337
898
126
This one says 14% (but their average yearly growth was 2%)

This one lists 12%

As I thought. Your links do not support what you claim. They have grown, but you made the jump to saying because.

Strong sales look likely to continue for some time. The company opened 96 new outposts in 2012, after opening 92 in 2011

You know who had an even bigger growth year? Chipotle.


Chick-Fil-A did have nice growth, but it was not some amazing thing compared to its past. You have no basis from those 2 links to make your claim that its growth is because of what happened. You can say they grew at a slightly higher rate than in the past, but that happens with new chains when they are popular.
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,040
136
And a business is happy over the new law and says they will not cater to gays and this law protects them...

RFRA: First Michiana business to publicly deny same-sex service
http://www.abc57.com/story/28681598/rfra-first-business-to-publicly-deny-same-sex-service

If you search their name in google it comes up with gaybearfinder.com as their website. That and yelp reviews are of course coming in full force.

The search also shows it as GayMemories Pizza...LOL!!!

Awww, they fixed it.
 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,655
687
126
A better question is if we can force gay bakers to bake cakes for the Westboro Baptist Church.

Tolerance goes both ways. No matter how distasteful or awful the WBC or its teachings are, if they went into a bakery owned by gay folks and wanted a cake, the gay folks should comply (unless the WBC folks are behaving in such a way that you could legitimately have them removed from your store).
 

Atreus21

Lifer
Aug 21, 2007
12,001
571
126
Hey, you said that people shouldn't be forced into economic exchanges. Let's follow that logic. Are you against requiring insurance? Against requiring buildings to be kept up? Those are all forced exchanges.

No, I'm not against the government enforcing certain codes to uphold standards.

Additionally, Jewish bakers could not be forced to make things with swastikas on them. This was covered earlier.

And earlier, you also posted this:

if you open your business to the public you must serve the public.

So evidently, it's really "you must serve the public, unless..."

Business owners have every freedom to express their conscience regarding how they do business and with whom. There are tons of businesses that are not open to the public. If you make the personal choice to create a business that is open to the public though, with that comes a set of consequences you accept. If you don't want to accept them, don't do it.

Then that explicitly contradicts what you said above. There are exceptions to this by your own reasoning, in that companies cannot be forced to be part of a message.

Your business is not in fact open to the public when you're looking for a job. That's simply not the definition of the term.

How not? I'm promoting my service to anyone who wants it.
 

sphenodont

Member
Jan 8, 2010
151
1
81
Serious question as I honestly don't know the answer to this. Has the owner of chic-fil-a gone on record as saying he doesn't like gays or is it merely that he doesn't approve to the practice of homosexuality? To the best of my knowledge he's not like those diseased freaks at westboro baptist.

The president/COO of the company (son of the founder) has stated multiple times that he supports only the "biblical definition of the family" and that allowing gay marriage would be "inviting God's judgement on our nation".

The now-dead founder of Chikfilla set up a charitable foundation (that was heavily funded by the restaurant chain) that gave money to anti-gay organizations like FRC and Exodus Int'l. They sponsored conferences in support of Proposition 8 and they refused to allow gay couples at any of the camps, retreats, and other activities they host.
 

Atreus21

Lifer
Aug 21, 2007
12,001
571
126
Tolerance goes both ways. No matter how distasteful or awful the WBC or its teachings are, if they went into a bakery owned by gay folks and wanted a cake, the gay folks should comply (unless the WBC folks are behaving in such a way that you could legitimately have them removed from your store).

No, they shouldn't. That's not tolerance. That's unreasonable coercion. You shouldn't be forced to trade with someone who hates your guts.
 
Feb 6, 2007
16,432
1
81
No, they shouldn't. That's not tolerance. That's unreasonable coercion. You shouldn't be forced to trade with someone who hates your guts.

No one is forcing a business to trade with anyone because opening a business is not mandatory. Extending this line of logic, we shouldn't be able to enforce ANY regulations against businesses because "who are you to tell me I can't hire kids and pay them in spankings?" Business owners agree to abide by local and Federal laws when they incorporate and part of those laws are public accommodations laws which requires businesses to treat all members of the public equally. That's not some undue burden, it's a part of doing business in our country and has been for over 50 years.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,644
50,877
136
No, I'm not against the government enforcing certain codes to uphold standards.

Okay, so you're fine with the government forcing people to perform economic transactions then.

Since you're fine with that in principle, why are you fine with the government forcing people to perform economic transactions with insurance companies but not fine with the government forcing people to perform economic transactions with black or gay people?

I know that sounds unfair, but that's seriously what your argument is.

And earlier, you also posted this:

So evidently, it's really "you must serve the public, unless..."

It was a simple way of saying what the law says. More specifically it says if you serve the public you can't deny service based on membership in a protected class.

Then that explicitly contradicts what you said above. There are exceptions to this by your own reasoning, in that companies cannot be forced to be part of a message.

No it doesn't. You cannot force a company to speak in a way you want (1st amendment).

You can still force them to engage in commerce. (not protected by the 1st amendment).

How not? I'm promoting my service to anyone who wants it.

Because that's simply not how they are defined under the law. For a general explanation of what is, read here:

http://civilrights.findlaw.com/enfo.../discrimination-in-public-accommodations.html
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,248
16,716
136
The problem with this bill is its there simply to appeal to the conservative base. Honestly how many people are forced to bake gay wedding cakes? How many gay marriages want cakes from bakers that don't want to bake the cake?
This is a law that could have unintended consequences there is no clear need for this law so why enact it?
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |