Indictments coming...

Page 171 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
28,774
40,255
136
I can't wait to hear Fox and talk radio just implode.

Soon there will be legions of republicans who never liked the guy, didn't vote for him.
 

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
11,940
8,369
136
Do you ever feel like a kitten chasing a little red laser dot? You should. Too bad your wet dream of President Trump and his family being led off in handcuffs for collusion and obstruction was just another leftist masturbatory fantasy.

You Trump voters have the awesome fantasies of being the citizens of TrumpFuckheadistan! Build the wall! Kick the Blue states out!!!!!
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,254
16,729
136
I can't wait to hear Fox and talk radio just implode.

Soon there will be legions of republicans who never liked the guy, didn't vote for him.

They’ll stick with what I just heard on cnn radio. AGs summary is no Americans or campaign officials were actively/knowingly working with Russia. This includes Hillary but they’ll skip over that part.
 

Maxima1

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2013
3,538
759
146
No obstruction of justice either. Not enough evidence to support it.

Which is monumentally stupid, but i expected that they might just dump all the perjuries and obstruction elements if no charges came. I wonder what the exact reasoning is. is it because they can't differentiate between obvious obstruction and Donnie' Article 2 powers?
 
Jan 25, 2011
16,702
8,926
146
Which is monumentally stupid, but i expected that they might just dump all the perjuries and obstruction elements if no charges came. I wonder what the exact reasoning is. is it because they can't differentiate between obvious obstruction and Donnie' Article 2 powers?
Actually the report explicitly states Myellers decision was in no way based on any constitutional basis but solely on an evidentiary basis.
 

Maxima1

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2013
3,538
759
146
Actually the report explicitly states Myellers decision was in no way based on any constitutional basis but solely on an evidentiary basis.

Again, i would love to see the reasoning is on the "evidentiary basis". Because saying he wasn't actively obstructing is stupid.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
28,774
40,255
136
Disappointing, baffling even, given what we've seen in writing and out of Trump's own piehole.

Very surprising, but then this doesn't mean he's in the clear.
 

BUTCH1

Lifer
Jul 15, 2000
20,433
1,769
126
They’ll stick with what I just heard on cnn radio. AGs summary is no Americans or campaign officials were actively/knowingly working with Russia. This includes Hillary but they’ll skip over that part.
I'm dumbfounded, so Trump Jr's "if you've got dirt we'd love it" is somehow NOT conspiracy?, by law anyone involved who is contacted by any foreign entity to affect an election is required to report such an attempt. So the info was a flop, the intent was obvious IMO. Also shocked BOTH Barr and RR determined there was no obstruction, huh?, "I fired Comey, that whole Russia thing", if that's not obstruction I don't know what is.
 

IJTSSG

Golden Member
Aug 12, 2014
1,122
278
136
So the banana republicans have lost both the time argument, and the money argument regarding Mueller's investigation? Nice. Sounds about right for the hypocrites who are wrong about pretty much everything.

Oh noes, Rim Job must have another splinter or pube stuck in there, he's making noises again.
Since the summary findings were just released it appears you and the rest of the TDS suffering fucktards were wrong about absolutely everything. It's not surprising but it is fucking hilarious.
 
Jan 25, 2011
16,702
8,926
146
Again, i would love to see the reasoning is on the "evidentiary basis". Because saying he wasn't actively obstructing is stupid.

There’s an entire paragraph in the letter that explains it. Can’t post the screen capture image for some reason.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,254
16,729
136
I'm dumbfounded, so Trump Jr's "if you've got dirt we'd love it" is somehow NOT conspiracy?, by law anyone involved who is contacted by any foreign entity to affect an election is required to report such an attempt. So the info was a flop, the intent was obvious IMO. Also shocked BOTH Barr and RR determined there was no obstruction, huh?, "I fired Comey, that whole Russia thing", if that's not obstruction I don't know what is.

Keep in mind this is a summary from Trumps appointed AG
I’m sure I could troll thru all your posts and find something that can be summarized as “Trump is God!”

For the record I’m glad, the thought that anyone running for President would actively rely upon Russia to win is very disturbing.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
28,774
40,255
136
"“The Special Counsel states that ‘while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.’”

Interesting.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,254
16,729
136
Since the summary findings were just released it appears you and the rest of the TDS suffering fucktards were wrong about absolutely everything. It's not surprising but it is fucking hilarious.

Summary findings from the Trump appointed AG
However this is good news for the President as of now. We’ll see what deeds were done and what needs to be done to prevent Russian meddling, that will include stuff Obama should have done & what should be currently done.
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,575
126
So Trump is pretty much totally clear on collusion.
You could kind of see that coming given that not a single American was charged with attempting to influence the election.

Obstruction evidence, which is hard to prosecute anyway, is apparently very weak.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
28,774
40,255
136
Manafort giving 2016 election data to a Ukrainian with Russian intelligence ties must just sound bad, when it was all just purely innocent. Ok.

You know what's going to be fun? Seeing what happens the minute Trump isn't in office anymore. That might be a swearing in that gets you the crowd size you were looking for Donnie.
 
Last edited:

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,575
126
Trump still has legal problems, but I think he is clear of anything turned up by Mueller.
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,575
126
Manafort giving 2016 election data to a Ukrainian with Russian intelligence ties must just sound bad, when it was all just purely innocent. Ok.

I heard that it was just polling data, which anyone could use. Apparently that was indeed the case.
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
24,941
9,231
136
Since the summary findings were just released it appears you and the rest of the TDS suffering fucktards were wrong about absolutely everything. It's not surprising but it is fucking hilarious.
I don't see what's funny about this. We've been waiting for 2 years to find out whether or not the sitting President and/or his campaign team sold out their country for the purpose of winning an election. Pretty serious stuff. I think a lot of us "TDS suffering fucktards" are happy that a thorough, unbiased investigation revealed that there was not a coordinated conspiracy. I also think that these summary findings probably don't speak to all the evidence uncovered by Mueller's team, and I'd withhold judgement on just how stupid/compromised Trump's team was in accepting stolen emails and damaging intel from a foreign source (it's quite possible they were very stupid/compromised without breaking any laws...sound familiar? Hint: Hillary's emails...)
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,575
126
I don't see what's funny about this. We've been waiting for 2 years to find out whether or not the sitting President and/or his campaign team sold out their country for the purpose of winning an election. Pretty serious stuff. I think a lot of us "TDS suffering fucktards" are happy that a thorough, unbiased investigation revealed that there was not a coordinated conspiracy. I also think that these summary findings probably don't speak to all the evidence uncovered by Mueller's team, and I'd withhold judgement on just how stupid/compromised Trump's team was in accepting stolen emails and damaging intel from a foreign source (it's quite possible they were very stupid/compromised without breaking any laws...sound familiar? Hint: Hillary's emails...)

Will those who gave Hillary the benefit of the doubt, give the same benefit of the doubt to Trump? No.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
28,774
40,255
136
I don't see what's funny about this. We've been waiting for 2 years to find out whether or not the sitting President and/or his campaign team sold out their country for the purpose of winning an election. Pretty serious stuff. I think a lot of us "TDS suffering fucktards" are happy that a thorough, unbiased investigation revealed that there was not a coordinated conspiracy. I also think that these summary findings probably don't speak to all the evidence uncovered by Mueller's team, and I'd withhold judgement on just how stupid/compromised Trump's team was in accepting stolen emails and damaging intel from a foreign source (it's quite possible they were very stupid/compromised without breaking any laws...sound familiar? Hint: Hillary's emails...)

It's just part of their denial mechanism, don't let it get to you. I think we're all very relieved it might not be as we were fearing. Still a lot that needs to be explained, but I ultimately intend to live up to my prior oath of sorts, that if Mueller and his team of exceptional folks say this is just a case of horrible optics and some greedy people, and not treasonous conspiracy, then I will accept it. It's not like there is a shortage of reasons this guy shouldn't be in office.

I'm just not taking Barr's word on it, knowing his views on executive power and also that the WH is still wanting to exert executive privilege over portions of the report. Still room for plenty of suspicion here, and damn near everything about this admin from the last 2 years proves it is warranted.
 
Reactions: TeeJay1952
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |