Why? You think it's going to stop at the 34 indictments already announced?
Ok chief. No imdictments on Trump coming. Can you do me a favor and hold your breath until there are?There
You need to better parse Barr's letter. The Special Counsel did not establish that illegal conspiracy occurred, not that there is no evidence-
https://www.scribd.com/document/402...se-and-Senate-Judiciary-Committees#from_embed
The explanations of the Trump tower meeting, for example, merely establish plausible deniability & that's all that's required.
No imdictments on Trump coming. Can you do me a favor and hold your breath until there are?The report has not been released to the public yet. Let's see how Mueller characterizes it. There's already loads of circumstantial evidence that's publicly known. "No evidence" very likely means no smoking gun.
No imdictments on Trump coming. Can you do me a favor and hold your breath until there are?Why? You think it's going to stop at the 34 indictments already announced?
This is EXACTLY what it says direct fromThe report says NO evidence of collision, not insufficient
while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it does not exonerate him
You've read it? Can you please post a link?Ive stated several times over the lst 18 months I support the investigation, and would support whatever conclusion that came from it. Russian interference DID influence our election (which Ive also said several times) but it appears there was no collusion by Trump. So there's that...
No imdictments on Trump coming. Can you do me a favor and hold your breath until there are?
Or if contextThis is EXACTLY what it says direct from
So you saying there is NO evidence is obviously not correct as none of us outside of the ones that have seen it have any idea. That line right there says it all direct from Barr's summary. Collusion is not a crime either.
Read what's been released asshatYou've read it? Can you please post a link?
LolSo what? Your "no evidence" claim is false. Trump has the campaign finance felony charge waiting for him when he leaves office, as well. Or maybe he'll make Pence President for a day in return for a pardon.
It's remarkable how Trump has lowered GOP standards for presidential conduct to the point that "Can't prove it in Court!" is the go-to rationale. At least they quit going on about "Values", huh?
No imdictments on Trump coming. Can you do me a favor and hold your breath until there are?
Ok chief. No imdictments on Trump coming. Can you do me a favor and hold your breath until there are?
No imdictments on Trump coming. Can you do me a favor and hold your breath until there are?
Lol
Duhversion
I have heard that Barr consulted with Mueller before releasing his summary (even if that source on the radio was incorrect) we have seen Mueller correct a news organization that he felt was characterizing his statements in a wrong manner.
I believe if Mueller felt that Barr's summary was too inaccurate he would release a correction to Barr's statement.
_________________
No imdictments on Trump coming. Can you do me a favor and hold your breath until there are?
I have heard that Barr consulted with Mueller before releasing his summary (even if that source on the radio was incorrect) we have seen Mueller correct a news organization that he felt was characterizing his statements in a wrong manner.
I believe if Mueller felt that Barr's summary was too inaccurate he would release a correction to Barr's statement.
No evidence at all either, but just make it up the way the rest of the forum fuckholes are making it up.And since Manafort stopped cooperating, there is no one in that room who will verify that any sort of quid pro quo deal was made. That's why it doesn't surprise me that Mueller had insufficient evidence of collusion. There is only two ways to bust a conspiracy: either you get an agreement on video/audio tape, which requires a wiretap, or one of the co-conspirators admits it. We don't have either of those things here.
Ive stated several times over the lst 18 months I support the investigation, and would support whatever conclusion that came from it. Russian interference DID influence our election (which Ive also said several times) but it appears there was no collusion by Trump. So there's that...
Nonetheless, I'd rather see the report itself.
Out of context quotes and suppositions? I did, dumbnuts.Read what's been released asshat
LoLThere is SO much evidence that Drumpf and many in the GOP colluded with Russia for policy shifts in exchange for Russia helping them win the election (with the primary factor being the Weiner hoax).
This being the most explosive. It may get reported in the MSM soon. It's extensive enough that through the line of succession, it may be Orrin Hatch. It's obvious Pence knew what Flynn was up to, for example.
LoL
This thread needs to stay right on top.
The usual standard for ethics is:So what? Your "no evidence" claim is false. Trump has the campaign finance felony charge waiting for him when he leaves office, as well. Or maybe he'll make Pence President for a day in return for a pardon.
It's remarkable how Trump has lowered GOP standards for presidential conduct to the point that "Can't prove it in Court!" is the go-to rationale. At least they quit going on about "Values", huh?